Choader Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Tell me this PC! Who is Aircastle going to compete with now in the nukes per nation stat? You've destroyed Aircastle's will to live. On behave of all our employees I surrender to the forces of PC. We're in your bankruptcy court now. Please be gentle.Seriously though. This takes balls and I have great deal of respect for you. It saddens me that it has to be the NpO, another alliance I respect, but I can't think of a better opponent on the battlefield. I'm jealous of your casualties. Debt settlement denied, your nukes are to be seized and delivered to our new northern outpost for future expansion. Hi John, how's business? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trigger Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 You really want this to escalate beyond the three alliances? What i say is by no means a reflection of the reasoning, except that of my own. If we attacked PC, it would then turn global. By attacking \m/, PC comes to there defense and it stays contained, so as to not put everyone into a world wide conflict.That is just my two cents on the matter. If that's your two cents worth I expect change back, or even a full refund. NpO had only one reason to not want this to go global. They would have bitten off way more than they could chew. They wanted it contained so they could keep the numerical advantage, not to save any other alliance from losing some infra. Why do you think they would only allow two small alliances in without calling their treaties in? They would not accept a 1v1 ratio. If you're not going to be honest with others, at least be honest with yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llanowar Elf Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 (edited) Yet your members seem to think that PC getting involved was brought upon by \m/. Please update the ignorant with your actual reasoning rather than letting them sit and look stupid. As i have said in that argument, it is my own thoughts. It could be that it was brought on by \m/. I also think a contributing factor to just the \m/ declaration could be, there's a bigger picture here, that there is no reason for THIS conflict to spark a huge global war. It would end well for NO alliance involved. So although a lot of you probably disagree, but some of you will agree, the way it was done is for the best. Edit: Stupid typos Edited January 22, 2010 by Llanowar Elf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Probably the same reason you haven't used your oA clause to attack PC or \m/ despite how much you want this war to escalate. Not really, mine isn't a matter of "can't". I was asked by a friend not to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krunk the Great Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 there is no reason for THIS conflict to spark a huge global war. You hurt me Also, Yes I would like global war to wait until I get nukes again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Not really, mine isn't a matter of "can't". I was asked by a friend not to. You mean like how some alliances asked NpO not to attack \m/? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krunk the Great Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Not really, mine isn't a matter of "can't". I was asked by a friend not to. But Lord Moldavi, Friends aren't supposed to ask you to not step in--even if it IS in the words of the treaty! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 All that needs to be said: swift death to PC and may the strength of righteousness be on the side of NpO 0/ I love when the Sith preach about righteousness. Tell me more! Tell me more! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 You mean like how some alliances asked NpO not to attack \m/? \m/ is deserving of whatever punishment they receive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 I love when the Sith preach about righteousness. Tell me more! Tell me more! Deceit is a tool of the Sith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 You mean like how some alliances asked NpO not to attack \m/? It isn't the same thing because Polar is involved in the conflict and is the one making the request of me directly. It isn't the same as one of our other allies, who are not involved, asking me not to attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krunk the Great Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 I love when the Sith preach about righteousness. Tell me more! Tell me more! ♪Was it love at first sight?♪ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Deceit is a tool of the Sith. I some how doubt your member was trying to deceive anyone. If you or Chron posted that, my reaction would have been different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 I some how doubt your member was trying to deceive anyone. If you or Chron posted that, my reaction would have been different. I have found that Krunk is a surprising fellow on occasion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 It isn't the same thing because Polar is involved in the conflict and is the one making the request of me directly. It isn't the same as one of our other allies, who are not involved, asking me not to attack. Then should someone asking Polar not to attack that is involved weigh more than someone that isn't involved? From what I check the nations that did request for NpO not to attack are involved in some shape or form unlike the fact that NpO is not involved with FoA, unless they've changed their name to NpO (New Police Order). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 (edited) I have found that Krunk is a surprising fellow on occasion. Ivan 1 - AirMe 0 EDIT: Though the original quote was not from Krunk. Edited January 22, 2010 by AirMe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wad of Lint Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 You mean like how some alliances asked NpO not to attack \m/? More like if \m/ asked PC to stay out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 More like if \m/ asked PC to stay out. How would that be? PC is actually allied to \m/. NpO is not allied to FoA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 perhaps you need to stop letting that ego get in the way of your sarcasm detector. seriously, lighten up, it appears as though your shoulders are weighed down by your need for everyone to acknowledge how crazy awesome you may have once been. we can only be judged on our success in the moment. legacies are formed after you retire. I haven't asked for anyone to acknowledge anything about me rather than my points. He found it fitting to call me an inexperienced war fighter and I called him out on it. Do try read stuff in context. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wad of Lint Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 How would that be? PC is actually allied to \m/. NpO is not allied to FoA. Where were we talking about FoA? You asked the question of Ivan, Emperor of the NSO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 (edited) Where were we talking about FoA? You asked the question of Ivan, Emperor of the NSO. I'm comparing that to the current situation in which he was regarding. You where asked by NpO to sit this matter out. Alliances asked NpO not to attack \m/ NpO decided to attack anyway. PC then declared on NpO. Edited January 22, 2010 by Tick1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wad of Lint Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 I'm comparing that to the current situation in which he was regarding. There's a difference. NpO asking NSO to stay out, is an ally asking an ally to not come to their defense. So if you want to compare apples to apples, it would be the same as \m/ asking PC to stay out. The two situations to which you are comparing are quite different. One is in a defensive situation, the other aggressive. As such, it is useless to compare them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaarlaamp Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 Considering he tried to say I have no war experience earlier, I don't think he's too bright either. Just out of curiosity, with what nation did you gain this war experience? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palpatine001 Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 And there goes the GRL count again :\ Ah well time to watch the next fireworks show :nuke: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han fei zi Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 (edited) Considering he tried to say I have no war experience earlier, I don't think he's too bright either. This is gold. Edited January 25, 2010 by han fei zi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.