Jump to content

Announcement from Dark Fist


Recommended Posts

i would kinda like a reply about the link leading to a 404 error/not found code. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=2047312

[ooc] certain imageboards delete their stuff after a period of time, some boards are quicker than others. So, the OP, unless it's screenshotted, no longer exists [/ooc]

Good day sir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[ooc] certain imageboards delete their stuff after a period of time, some boards are quicker than others. So, the OP, unless it's screenshotted, no longer exists [/ooc]

Good day sir.

ooc: this was not an imageboard. the link went directly to /b/ and on /b/ was stated as a 404 error. also, according to the SS that SCM provided, the post on /b/ was made on the 21st. i doubt even the quickest board takes something down after just two days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ooc: this was not an imageboard. the link went directly to /b/ and on /b/ was stated as a 404 error. also, according to the SS that SCM provided, the post on /b/ was made on the 21st. i doubt even the quickest board takes something down after just two days.

[ooc] /b/ is different from most forums. They have like... 10 or 20 pages and once your thread goes to the last one it gets deleted. Threads there sometimes last less than 1 minute so it's not strange that it got deleted that fast, what is strange is that someone was able to found the thread mentioned in the OP. [/ooc]

Back to the topic, I don't think there's anything to add. In fact, there's nothing to add since the OP. This is full of nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[ooc] /b/ is different from most forums. They have like... 10 or 20 pages and once your thread goes to the last one it gets deleted. Threads there sometimes last less than 1 minute so it's not strange that it got deleted that fast, what is strange is that someone was able to found the thread mentioned in the OP. [/ooc]

Back to the topic, I don't think there's anything to add. In fact, there's nothing to add since the OP. This is full of nonsense.

ooc: thanks. i did not know that about /b/. thank you for the clarification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yes, on past precedent, an alliance of NSO's size acting the way they do would probably have got themselves into big trouble now without Polar. The RAD incident, for example.

Greetings,

You are correct, I'll add that given the situation, More of that applies to DF, infact, that also applies to other alliances who were bailed out by their allies. Your statement fundamentally applies to a significant subset of non-neutral alliances in this game. Say Hello to the Culprit No.1: Treaty Web. NSO were accused of some stuff, Now I have not followed the thread and I'll assume DF has not backed its accusations with any shred of solid evidence. (My apologies if its otherwise), they have only shown us circumstantial evidence, one that can be created by any of the involved party or any third party. Its natural that their response is less than polite, I believe that would be the case of any alliance with even tiniest bit of self-integrity.

Regards.

Edited by shahenshah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evading the point again. That being that it is amusing to see you accuse NSO of not meeting your diplomatic sensibilities when you decided to take the undiplomatic approach and plaster your accusations all over the public forum.

I already addressed this - in our opinion issuing threats and ultimatums is much worse than anything we did.

OOC: Wait, you accused someone of an OOC criminal act and thought it was funny?

OOC?: Criminal? The act was not criminal.

If you are not threatening anyone, get this over with. Apologize, state these were not your true intentions, and move on.

There is no way we are going to apologise for something we clearly did not do - especially if we are to do so due to a threat, as opposed to our own will.

I said this a million times, and I will say it a million times more. We never threatened NSO. The statement about NSO's destruction is a joke. This is obvious to the intelligent amongst us, who know what that statement was a parody of. To the rest I kindly say, stop spewing your nonsense in the hopes it will become reality.

Even so, I fail to understand how something which is clearly an opinion, ie of the form "I think something and such" could be perceived as a threat.

Ex 2: Just so happens SCM was on /b/ at this exact time to find that exact topic?

If you read the OP, I was not on the imageboard, but was informed about it by another person, who is completely unrelated to me or DF.

ooc: this was not an imageboard. the link went directly to /b/ and on /b/ was stated as a 404 error. also, according to the SS that SCM provided, the post on /b/ was made on the 21st. i doubt even the quickest board takes something down after just two days.

You best be joking.

Edited by Starcraftmazter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You accused NSO of doing something absurd because you are so caught up in hate for them that you overlooked all reason. Thus, you made a conspiracy theory, as you have admittedly zero proof.

That is why President SO used the image correctly.

I'll admit I haven't read much of the thread besides the OP, but I'm guessing this is a pretty good description of the thread so far?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as much as i am not a fan of youwish, i have never seen him operate in this manner whatsoever. so i am far more inclined to believe him than SCM.

Just earlier that day, youwish was bragging to me how he cheated our alliance of 180mill when he pulled Soldier towards TPF for the lulz.

So I have, and thus, I stand by the accusation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just earlier that day, youwish was bragging to me how he cheated our alliance of 180mill when he pulled Soldier towards TPF for the lulz.

So I have, and thus, I stand by the accusation.

because doing something ingame like cheating your alliance out of money, is equivalent to going to /b/ and asking them to spam gore porn on your forums?

in that case, you posing as Grub back in the day is proof that you requested /b/ to post gore sporn on your own forums.

So I have, and thus, I stand by this accusation. SCM did it because he decided to one day impersonate Grub on IRC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 pages of stuff...and still no DoW even tho DF was attacked by people under the NSO AA ? (please someone tell me I'm delusional...but I think this calls for a war ?)

Even better, one of the guys that attacked switched AA's so they can declare them him as rogue...intentionally, I might add.

Edited by KingEd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

because doing something ingame like cheating your alliance out of money, is equivalent to going to /b/ and asking them to spam gore porn on your forums?

I was merely pointing out that he thought it was funny to attempt to make fun of us for such an incident which dates a while back. This is only one of the things Youwish did that day, and does in general.

44 pages of stuff...and still no DoW even tho DF was attacked by people under the NSO AA ? (please someone tell me I'm delusional...but I think this calls for a war ?)

Even better, one of the guys that attacked switched AA's so they can declare them him as rogue...intentionally, I might add.

Yes, and people claim we are undiplomatic warmongers, hell bent on provoking a war :rolleyes:

Edited by Starcraftmazter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 pages of stuff...and still no DoW even tho DF was attacked by people under the NSO AA ? (please someone tell me I'm delusional...but I think this calls for a war ?)

Even better, one of the guys that attacked switched AA's so they can declare them him as rogue...intentionally, I might add.

get a grip this was discussed earlier read the damn board, if your not gonna follow along dont waste your time commenting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 pages of stuff...and still no DoW even tho DF was attacked by people under the NSO AA ? (please someone tell me I'm delusional...but I think this calls for a war ?)

Even better, one of the guys that attacked switched AA's so they can declare them him as rogue...intentionally, I might add.

I was thinking exactly the same.

It's not that it was that much of a point of a discussion.

Anyone with perfect sense can see that no definite conclusions can be drawed upon the 'information' (I don't even want to call it evidence) in the OP.

Its getting old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

get a grip this was discussed earlier read the damn board, if your not gonna follow along dont waste your time commenting

Sorry...just don't have the time to read the 25 extra pages that were posted throughout last night and today...

Edited by KingEd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was merely pointing out that he thought it was funny to attempt to make fun of us for such an incident which dates a while back. This is only one of the things Youwish did that day, and does in general.

Yes, and people claim we are undiplomatic warmongers, hell bent on provoking a war :rolleyes:

Well, you do have coalition IRC channels, war channels and are trying to garner support from uninvolved parties. While NSO is just asking for an apology. You tell me...which side is preparing more for war? So....if the shoe fits.....

Edited by AirMe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you do have coalition IRC channels, war channels and are trying to garner support from uninvolved parties. While NSO is just asking for an apology. You tell me...which side is preparing more for war? So....if the shoe fits.....

So when your alliance is given an ultimatum you're just going to sit there and not prepare for a fight? :blink:

That is a damn strange way to do business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...