kevin32891 Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 If he wasn't baiting, he should understand that the way he phrases his posts comes off that way and try to not do so in future. He'd been talking about 'feeding off the hate' and so on before his rating post as well .And yes, rising to the bait wasn't clever, but people were trying to claim that Ragnarok/Hoo had been unreasonably aggressive towards NSO, when in actuality his response to Corinan's (real or apparent) bait was fairly diplomatic. So we can agree that we popularized "white peace" and Van Hoo created "Aggressive Diplomacy". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpoiL Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 I suppose I should get around to actually doing some rating. Justifications given for large alliances and/or ones I care about.lolhalla - 3 - Defintely less vocal since they lost that whole Continuum thing. I wonder why. I could have swore ODN government had a different view of Valhalla back when it was puckering up to IRON. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 I could have swore ODN government had a different view of Valhalla back when it was puckering up to IRON. "Ahaha, your opinion of an alliance has changed in the past 8 months!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 If he wasn't baiting, he should understand that the way he phrases his posts comes off that way and try to not do so in future. He'd been talking about 'feeding off the hate' and so on before his rating post as well .And yes, rising to the bait wasn't clever, but people were trying to claim that Ragnarok/Hoo had been unreasonably aggressive towards NSO, when in actuality his response to Corinan's (real or apparent) bait was fairly diplomatic. Are you seriously claiming that my lovely Doppiebear "started it" by simply participating in the topic? This is a stupid argument anyway, and you won't ever stop finding any possible link to justify your bias, but that's just remarkably inane and irrational. Hence, I must remark. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunstar Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 I could have swore ODN government had a different view of Valhalla back when it was puckering up to IRON. I do believe that was one or two specific people, and 12 months ago. At any rate, how're you doing these days SpoiL? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scythegfx Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 I could have swore ODN government had a different view of Valhalla back when it was puckering up to IRON. That's pretty possible. Views Change, don't they? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpoiL Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 (edited) That's pretty possible. Views Change, don't they? nvm Yes. Just fun watching those views change opposite to mine. I'm a little curious to know what changed them. BnT maybe. I do believe that was one or two specific people, and 12 months ago.At any rate, how're you doing these days SpoiL? They were some ambitious people, fighting an uphill battle. I am well, thanks. Edited November 8, 2009 by SpoiL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 And I don't even care that no one else will get the reference! You'd think that, but you'd be wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nutkase Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 Who's really baiting here? Corinan for voicing a simple opinion and defending it or you for insinuating that Corinan "started it". OOC: Honestly, I'm tempted to just report you for discussing mod issues but I think it would be counterproductive as you've already done enough damage by making false accusations of baiting after Corinan simply participated in this topic, as per the OP's instructions. Just as you say Corinan is entitled to his opinion, guess what bob is also entitled to his aswell. He plays it as he see it, and it is not very often that he is incorrect in his findings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 Just as you say Corinan is entitled to his opinion, guess what bob is also entitled to his aswell. He plays it as he see it, and it is not very often that he is incorrect in his findings. Everyone is entitled to my opinion. Who am I to deny them of it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpoiL Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 Just as you say Corinan is entitled to his opinion, guess what bob is also entitled to his aswell. He plays it as he see it, and it is not very often that he is incorrect in his findings. Let me be perfectly clear, we in NSO are all for one's right to be wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nutkase Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 (edited) Let me be perfectly clear, we in NSO are all for one's right to be wrong. Well after reading Corinan's rankings, does seem over the top since you do either one of two things for most alliances. Saying that they bash NSO all the time or want to destroy you but don't have the nads to. Therefor I consider bobs opinion to be correct Now since you say this about so many alliances do you not consider in the slightest if true why they would bash or want NSO destroyed? or are you to busy worshiping Ivan's shopping list as stated by Sunstar. when I say you, I mean Corinan not you SpoiL EDIT: Grammer FTW Edited November 8, 2009 by nutkase Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acca Dacca Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 Who's really baiting here? Corinan for voicing a simple opinion and defending it or you for insinuating that Corinan "started it". OOC: Honestly, I'm tempted to just report you for discussing mod issues but I think it would be counterproductive as you've already done enough damage by making false accusations of baiting after Corinan simply participated in this topic, as per the OP's instructions. If I call you out on baiting, does that mean I'm baiting? Pretty sure Hoo was voicing his opinion, too. Damn this argument is annoying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 why they would bash or want NSO destroyed? Fear and jealousy. or are you to busy worshiping Ivan's shopping list as stated by Sunstar. What? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 i'll play (but don't expect many high or low numbers and if you ask me tomorrow some numbers may change) TOP - 5 Used to be higher, but I lost a lot of respect for them over the first half of this year MHA - 4 see TOP Sparta - 5 don't much care either way NpO - 6 Post Sponge Polar is ++ but I question the influences of another alliances IRON - 8 Good chaps ODN - * other than Cat i don't know anyone, and have no opinion FARK - 5 I went to ZI for these guys back in the day, but have had little interaction since GPA - 5 pacifism, lol NPO - 4 i have prejudices from my early days in CN, and the actions immediately preceding and during the opening rounds of teh Karma war left a bad taste in my mouth, but I'm willing to see if Cortath can do anything with what they have FOK - 4 mostly because of the ifok relationship MK - 6 If i wasn't in Valhalla, i'd have most likely wound up in MK when my sabbatical on the moon ended WTF - * no opinion TOOL - 6 Kinda like these guys, no real reson for it though TDO - * VE - * Legion - 7 Some good people doing a decent job and working against a bad rap. Saying they suffer from Stockholm Syndrome is a slap in the face. RoK - 6 Always seem decent enough when speaking to them, and whoo Vikings GATO - 6 My first home, way back when CSN - * Athens - 3 Sorry, Jack annoys the hell outta me Gremlins - 4 They know the game, but they irk me for no apparent reason MCXA - 5 some days i'm not sure what to make of MCXA, although i've never made much of an attempt to know them better UPN - 4 Hi Altheus >_> RIA - 5 no real contact outside of Karma related business, easy enough to talk to though STA - 2 a few poison apples spoil this batch, could easily rate higher Invicta - 5 recently lowered my opinion but they've been repairing the rift and could rate higher RnR - * MASH - 6 Even if they did fight on the wrong side =P *** this is taking too long, so i'm just going to hit a few more and call it a post*** NSO - 3 The evil NPO of old is here, mostly because i don't like Ivan or his personality cult MA - 6 no Kait =( Umbrella - 5 hard to figure, but seemingly fair people FAN - 7 Gotta love how they stuck it out PC - 6 not much contact, but i've never had an issue with them recently and they were exceedingly easy to work with as we came off terms GGA - 4 Wrong turn at Albuquerque TPF - 7 Much love for the AA in general, certain individuals not so much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 NSO - 3 The evil NPO of old is here, mostly because i don't like Ivan or his personality cult First part is true, but someone's going to have to point me in the direction of Ivans cult in the NSO. I've been here since day one and I still can't find it. Ignorance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 First part is true, but someone's going to have to point me in the direction of Ivans cult in the NSO. I've been here since day one and I still can't find it. Ignorance. I know nothing of how it works within NSO, but claiming there's no Personality Cult around Ivan is ridiculous. Look at the reactions to threads and appearances he made before his most recent reroll, and what other former CN player could walk back into the game and create an AA of any significance over a weekend because of his name alone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 I know nothing of how it works within NSO, but claiming there's no Personality Cult around Ivan is ridiculous. Look at the reactions to threads and appearances he made before his most recent reroll, and what other former CN player could walk back into the game and create an AA of any significance over a weekend because of his name alone? Perhaps Ivan actually is a talented enough leader to have gotten such a thing on his own merits? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 I know nothing of how it works within NSO You could have (and should have) stopped right there. Yes, we grew quickly in the beginning due to the initial excitement of Ivans return, but the glory seekers soon left us. What we have now is the real deal and not some gaggle of misty eyed sycophants fawning over his every word. There is no personality cult in the New Sith Order. Ok maybe there is but it's built around me. I mean look at me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 Perhaps Ivan actually is a talented enough leader to have gotten such a thing on his own merits? or perhaps you've just drank too much of the kool-aid. I don't expect any standing member of any of the Orders to willingly admit to being a part of the aforementioned personality cult past or present, most people can't see it from the inside. This isn't a knock against you, Corinan or anyone else to whom it applies, it's just the way it works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 or perhaps you've just drank too much of the kool-aid. I don't expect any standing member of any of the Orders to willingly admit to being a part of the aforementioned personality cult past or present, most people can't see it from the inside. This isn't a knock against you, Corinan or anyone else to whom it applies, it's just the way it works. LOL, we're cult members, Chron! We should all start wearing utilitarian gray jumpsuits and shaving our heads. If we're gonna do it we might as well do it right. There's no comets scheduled to pass by Bob anytime soon, is there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 You could have (and should have) stopped right there. Yes, we grew quickly in the beginning due to the initial excitement of Ivans return, but the glory seekers soon left us. What we have now is the real deal and not some gaggle of misty eyed sycophants fawning over his every word. There is no personality cult in the New Sith Order.Ok maybe there is but it's built around me. I mean look at me! Thou dost protest too much methinks. The Personality Cult built NSO by your own admission. The only reason it may no longer exist is because familiarity breeds contempt, and his image is tarnished by repeated exposure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpoiL Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 Well after reading Corinan's rankings, does seem over the top since you do either one of two things for most alliances. Saying that they bash NSO all the time or want to destroy you but don't have the nads to. Therefor I consider bobs opinion to be correct Now since you say this about so many alliances do you not consider in the slightest if true why they would bash or want NSO destroyed? or are you to busy worshiping Ivan's shopping list as stated by Sunstar. when I say you, I mean Corinan not you SpoiL EDIT: Grammer FTW I joined NSO for the fabulous Heft. I never heard of this Ivan Muldabi chap. No way would I join an alliance for quality leadership. Nope, not me, never. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydro Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 I know nothing of how it works within NSO... You're right- you don't. Why you think you would thus be qualified to comment on the NSO is beyond me. As for the rest of that quote, did it ever occur to you that the NSO wasn't founded to be a 1 man alliance and that those responsible for its founding were competent enough to establish a basic infrastructure to ensure that the alliance wouldn't fall like a house of cards? Had the NSO been simply founded on a "cult of personality" then it would've fallen flat on its face, but it has instead thrived because those institutions that were created to ensure the viability of the alliance have proven to be the hallmark of effeciency and competency. But please, go ahead and attribute every last shred of success that we've had to this elusive "cult of personality" that apparently surrounds Ivan like some dark shroud; ignore the institutions that are responsible for our success and continued growth. After all, your actual argument isn't based on anything resembling facts or evidence, but rather on a mish-mash of misconstrued beliefs and platitudes that all seem to center around this vague "cult of personality". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nutkase Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 (edited) Fear and jealousy. of what precisely? Edited November 8, 2009 by nutkase Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.