Colerich Krieg Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 No. No it is not. Nazism is not German fascism. Germany was Fascist. Nazis were simply a political party. Nazism and Fascism are extremely different. Example: Ever heard of a little thing called the Holocaust? Yes, I have heard of the Holocaust. Nazism was the Ideology of the Nazi Party which was heavily influenced by German Nationalism and Fascism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted August 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 We already had a real cold war, between ComIntern and Nordland. We came very close to war several times. I was referring to the slightly breezy war between Krieg/Scotland & Euzkadi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colerich Krieg Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 I was referring to the slightly breezy war between Krieg/Scotland & Euzkadi now France is joining the party. Ironic since I gave up my claims so they can have a border close to Euzkadi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 This is OOC, Penchuk.And Ive clerly stated Im not Fascist. Get over it. stop acting childish IC and OOC. And if were rouge, then Attack me. See how the World reacts to you attacking a nation who wants nothing more then a peaceful exsistance amongst others. Ive reformed, Ive basicly appeased your Ego. Appartently there is nothing OOCly or ICly I can do to persuade you otherwise. How was that ever a cross between OOC/IC. Stop whining Colerich. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cataduanes Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Besides it is not as if the whole world is against you Colerich...judging by the amount of treaties you got under your belt in the last couple of days Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acca Dacca Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Paliament, Monarchy. With a hint of theocracy and a splash of conservatism republicanism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Xaristan is a Dictatorship... or, rather, a Directorship. Hmm...if you want to be THAT technical...Promised Land is an Administratorship. I'm a dictatorship now...sole owner of myself Heh heh, nice way of putting it. In regards to government interactions with citizens, Tahoe is extremely libertarian. There is such a strong social code of justice and honor system in place that those that step outside societal boundaries are castigated and exiled for all practical purposes, though. The honor system essentially forces certain types of behavior because in the eyes of Tahoans, in many cases death is more desirable than the shame brought on by certain actions.Non-citizens in Tahoe have very little rights (and essentially all non-whites are non-citizens except in certain instances). There are millions of non-citizens in Tahoe varying from native Americans to former slaves in Cuba or native Hawaiians. They are protected though, and mistreatment would be like animal cruelty in the honor system. Now, that's truely a unique system you got there...though you've told me it';s not completely, 100% original... @Penchuk...you're a kingdom, and you hate authoritarians...how ironic... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted August 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 (edited) Besides it is not as if the whole world is against you Colerich...judging by the amount of treaties you got under your belt in the last couple of days Holy cow, hes right!!! And I thought I was the only one Cole EDIT: And whos been going around saying im a girl on IRC?!?!?! Edited August 24, 2009 by Executive Minister Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loannes Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Yes, I have heard of the Holocaust. Nazism was the Ideology of the Nazi Party which was heavily influenced by German Nationalism and Fascism. Nazism and Fascism are not the same thing. They're not even close. They were a fascist government that were headed by the Nazi Party. Nazism was not an ideology until after Nazi Germany. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 I RP what I call a "Manager State" which is basically "fascist"; though not in the paternal sense of the twentieth century fascism of europe. Its more managerial and bureaucratic than militaristic and nationalistic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botha Posted August 26, 2009 Report Share Posted August 26, 2009 Transvaal's government is difficult to pin down and decribe. It certainly has some fascist elements due to the legacy of racial problems and how those have been dealt with by the (until very recently) ethnic minority which controls power. However strong elements of republicanism also ensure some senblance or at least appearance of electoral democracy is maintained at a government level (ignoring the period of Malan's rule) It could also be argued it is a monarchal system in that the head-of-state (staatspresident) is unelected and not subject to answering to the government. However the staatspresident, whilst having access to total power, also choses to generally NOT exercise that power - rather defering almost all domestic decisions to the Prime Minister. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teriethien Posted August 26, 2009 Report Share Posted August 26, 2009 My current head of government is a fascist idealogue, but he's not acting like one partly because he can't, and partly because he started off with a more or less democractic idealogy and slowly evolved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted August 26, 2009 Report Share Posted August 26, 2009 Transvaal's government is difficult to pin down and decribe. It certainly has some fascist elements due to the legacy of racial problems and how those have been dealt with by the (until very recently) ethnic minority which controls power. However strong elements of republicanism also ensure some senblance or at least appearance of electoral democracy is maintained at a government level (ignoring the period of Malan's rule) It could also be argued it is a monarchal system in that the head-of-state (staatspresident) is unelected and not subject to answering to the government. However the staatspresident, whilst having access to total power, also choses to generally NOT exercise that power - rather defering almost all domestic decisions to the Prime Minister. That last part sounds almost exactly like my government...Subtleknifewielder has ultimate authority, but usually chooses not to use it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted August 26, 2009 Report Share Posted August 26, 2009 That last part sounds almost exactly like my government...Subtleknifewielder has ultimate authority, but usually chooses not to use it. Interestingly, JFK has ultimate authority, and he choose to use it...most of the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted August 26, 2009 Report Share Posted August 26, 2009 Interestingly, JFK has ultimate authority, and he choose to use it...most of the time. So if he says no or yes on something, there's NO ONE who can legally veto HIS decision? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted August 26, 2009 Report Share Posted August 26, 2009 So if he says no or yes on something, there's NO ONE who can legally veto HIS decision? Right! The power of the National Assembly to override a Presidential veto was removed, so JFK's decision is final. Well, there IS one person who can legally veto his decision: himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted August 26, 2009 Report Share Posted August 26, 2009 Right! The power of the National Assembly to override a Presidential veto was removed, so JFK's decision is final. Well, there IS one person who can legally veto his decision: himself. That'd be intersting if you ever got an indecisive president. "Yes! I mean no! I mean yes! I mean...! Augh, Mr. Wilson, what's the compromise?" Back on topic... I say RP whoever you want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted August 27, 2009 Report Share Posted August 27, 2009 Right! The power of the National Assembly to override a Presidential veto was removed, so JFK's decision is final. Well, there IS one person who can legally veto his decision: himself. Better hope he doesn't develop a split personality then... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proxian Empire Posted August 28, 2009 Report Share Posted August 28, 2009 Hmm...if you want to be THAT technical...Promised Land is an Administratorship.Heh heh, nice way of putting it. Now, that's truely a unique system you got there...though you've told me it';s not completely, 100% original... @Penchuk...you're a kingdom, and you hate authoritarians...how ironic... Scotland is a Constitutional Monarchy, it is hardly the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarfef Posted August 28, 2009 Report Share Posted August 28, 2009 The Aether Empire is a dictatorship also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Litler Posted August 28, 2009 Report Share Posted August 28, 2009 I think it's pretty obvious what my persuasion is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted August 28, 2009 Report Share Posted August 28, 2009 I think it's pretty obvious what my persuasion is. I think you're not in CNRP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted August 28, 2009 Report Share Posted August 28, 2009 I think you're not in CNRP I think he's already made a claim, let's not scare away the new CNRPer's, mmkay? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted August 28, 2009 Report Share Posted August 28, 2009 Yes, he's made a claim, and the current owner of the territory (JEDCJT) still has yet to reply back... I'd PM Jed about this if I were him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biohazard Posted August 28, 2009 Report Share Posted August 28, 2009 Hmm. Im going to use my Political Science Nerd Degree to clear some things up.FASCISM - Is a Political Ideology set. It is NOT a form of government. It is the views of how the Government and nation should be ran. AUTHORITARIAN - Is another fancy word for Dictator, or, in some cases, a VERY powerful Executive Branch. This is the type of Government most Communist and Fascist use. For Example. Italy was Fascist. That was its Political Ideology and Party. The Government was Authoritarian. To be more specific Fascism is a collection of Far Right believes on Ideology, Government, and Economy. Communism can be described as "Red Fascism" Merely for the fact that the only difference is the Ideology. (Fascism is far Right believes, Communism with Far left.) BOTH Systems of Government usually use State Capitalism or State Socialism (Which are the exact same thing, surprisingly.) Both markets are regulated heavily. However the Fascist State Capitalism's main goal is production and regulation for private business for their State, while the Communist State Socialism's man goal is production and regulation for publicly owned business for the state. You have to realize that when describing a government or nation, 3 terms are needed. Ideology: (Example, Fascism, Communism, Democracy, etc) Government Type: (Example, Federal, Auth. etc) Economy: (Capitalism, Socialism, State, etc) Heres an example of the USA: Ideology: Democracy Government: Federal (3 Branches) Economy: Free Capitalism Nazi Germany: Ideology: Nazism (German form of Fascism) Government: Authoritarian Economy: State Capital/Socialism Also, on a side note, Tolitarianism is an extreme form of Authoritarianism, meaning, Tolitarian leaders attempt to exert FULL 100% control over the nation, while an Authoritarian government doesnt use such a grip, and allows certain freedoms and liberties. Compare the opposite to Anarchy, per say. Thank you Captain Obvious. Now that I'm done trolling, Furon is more of an authoritarian religious and nationalistic state. Arkvoodle be praised! o/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.