kevin32891 Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 I have never tech raided before, but I was told that you only use ground attacks unless things have changed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperion321 Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 I don't quite have time to read the whole [OOC]thread while I finish moving into my dorm[/OOC]. Has Stumpy made a tl;dr yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Maximus Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 (edited) They aren't attacking in defense, CG can have peace if they want it, Fran said in her OP that IS offered her peace, she turned it down and instead she is going to start a war of vengeance in order to obtain money from IS. This, is the same as IS did to CG, attacking for money and tech in their tech raid. So now all of a sudden asking for reps for a DEFENSIVE war/"raid" and attacking when you don't get it is a "war of vengeance"? Admin have mercy on us all if people really think this. CG is owed reps for what IS did. No ifs ands or buts about it. IS can either own up to their mistake or take the beating from the various friends of CG that want to attack them for their unprovoked transgressions. EDIT: Quote. Edited August 21, 2009 by James Maximus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddog241 Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 I have never tech raided before, but I was told that you only use ground attacks unless things have changed? every alliance i was apart of it was 2 ground attacks then send peace. NO cm,air,spies,nukes,navy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Diorno Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 So you are saying CG should just admit they are losers and be a good little alliance? Sounds kinda lame. I would obtain money if my alliance was attacked. If Francesca is going to continue her moral crusade though planet bob then yes, or she can attack IS and tell the world she is no longer the bastion for morality. To me though, if IS attacked Athens, I would be first in a long line of Athenians grinding their nations into absolute nothingness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 They aren't attacking in defense, CG can have peace if they want it, Fran said in her OP that IS offered her peace, she turned it down and instead she is going to start a war of vengeance in order to obtain money from IS. This, is the same as IS did to CG, attacking for money and tech in their tech raid. Francesca is asking for reparations for the damaged caused by Internet Superheroes when they launched a war of aggression on her alliance. It's not the same thing at all. What you're suggesting she do is allow her alliance to get attacked without repercussion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 As for the other bit, it is different in that those alliances would most likely be attacking IS in defence of CG, not just "for the lolz" or whatever the reason was ... does anyone actually know yet? As best I can figure out, it has something to do with Hell Scream saying mean things about Pink. From what I've seen of Francesca, she is a character that whines about morals all day long no matter how illogical they are. The action she is trying to take against IS is no more or less moral then what IS did to her alliance, she should realize this and do the moral thing and accept white peace from IS. To me, if she continues this course of action she is immoral. They aren't attacking in defense, CG can have peace if they want it, Fran said in her OP that IS offered her peace, she turned it down and instead she is going to start a war of vengeance in order to obtain money from IS. This, is the same as IS did to CG, attacking for money and tech in their tech raid. Fran is immoral. EDIT: fran is immoral Trying to equivocate IS attacking CG for no discernable reason with CG demanding reparations is, umm, I'm not really sure. Completely irrational and illogical and mind-melting. Sure, CG doesn't have to push for reps, but they are perfectly within their rights to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Portugal Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 (edited) From what I've seen of Francesca, she is a character that whines about morals all day long no matter how illogical they are. The action she is trying to take against IS is no more or less moral then what IS did to her alliance, she should realize this and do the moral thing and accept white peace from IS. To me, if she continues this course of action she is immoral. They aren't attacking in defense, CG can have peace if they want it, Fran said in her OP that IS offered her peace, she turned it down and instead she is going to start a war of vengeance in order to obtain money from IS. This, is the same as IS did to CG, attacking for money and tech in their tech raid. Fran is immoral. EDIT: fran is immoral Oh, so when someone punches you in the face out of nowhere, you should just lower your head and move on like a cute little puppy? That's moral to you? That's not morality, that's lack of spine. Regardless of Francesca's antics on the forums, her alliance got attacked and made a fool of by IS; now she has the right, and DUTY to defend the honour and respectability of her alliance and to hit IS back, or receive proper reparations instead. For you to somehow think acting otherwise is somehow immoral and wrong, it just baffles me beyond reason. Edited August 21, 2009 by Portugal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ubermeir Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 It would seem the aggresor would bear the brunt of responsibilty for any and all subsequent hostilities, be they localized or expanded. The morality is inherent in the initiating act and not contingent on subsequent acts excepting as subsequent act might contain larger quantities of immorality, which at this point seems unlikely. Poor show IS, and get your own tech, tech raiding pfft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willirica Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 I don't quite have time to read the whole [OOC]thread while I finish moving into my dorm[/OOC]. Has Stumpy made a tl;dr yet? ill try my best tl;dr CG; were getting owned! reps plx World; ebil IS! IS; no wai it was just a raiddddd!! Rad; ya man a raid PC; totally a raid World; dude thats totally not a raid CMs/Airforce/Navy/Spais IS; okay w/e they dont have treaties Rad; dude it was totally a raid, i use those things all, the time World; HYPROCRIT BUS DOCTRINE MEANS NOTHING Rad; lolwut IS; we make our own raiding policies jerks! Fort Pitt; Your in direct contradiction of your own policies on raiding IS *evidence* IS; err..... TC; WERE COMING AT UPDATE WATCHOUT BUT SHHHHHHH ITS A SEKRIT! tell me if i missed anything Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 ill try my besttl;dr CG; were getting owned! reps plx World; ebil IS! IS; no wai it was just a raiddddd!! Rad; ya man a raid PC; totally a raid World; dude thats totally not a raid CMs/Airforce/Navy/Spais IS; okay w/e they dont have treaties Rad; dude it was totally a raid, i use those things all, the time World; HYPROCRIT BUS DOCTRINE MEANS NOTHING Rad; lolwut IS; we make our own raiding policies jerks! Fort Pitt; Your in direct contradiction of your own policies on raiding IS *evidence* IS; err..... TC; WERE COMING AT UPDATE WATCHOUT BUT SHHHHHHH ITS A SEKRIT! tell me if i missed anything Nope...all good. Oh wait...your missing the ZOMG NSO USE MOLDAVI DOCTRINE!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 ill try my besttl;dr CG; were getting owned! reps plx World; ebil IS! IS; no wai it was just a raiddddd!! Rad; ya man a raid PC; totally a raid World; dude thats totally not a raid CMs/Airforce/Navy/Spais IS; okay w/e they dont have treaties Rad; dude it was totally a raid, i use those things all, the time World; HYPROCRIT BUS DOCTRINE MEANS NOTHING Rad; lolwut IS; we make our own raiding policies jerks! Fort Pitt; Your in direct contradiction of your own policies on raiding IS *evidence* IS; err..... TC; WERE COMING AT UPDATE WATCHOUT BUT SHHHHHHH ITS A SEKRIT! tell me if i missed anything Misses the mark due to lack of NSO mention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddog241 Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 ill try my besttl;dr CG; were getting owned! reps plx World; ebil IS! IS; no wai it was just a raiddddd!! Rad; ya man a raid PC; totally a raid World; dude thats totally not a raid CMs/Airforce/Navy/Spais IS; okay w/e they dont have treaties Rad; dude it was totally a raid, i use those things all, the time World; HYPROCRIT BUS DOCTRINE MEANS NOTHING Rad; lolwut IS; we make our own raiding policies jerks! Fort Pitt; Your in direct contradiction of your own policies on raiding IS *evidence* IS; err..... TC; WERE COMING AT UPDATE WATCHOUT BUT SHHHHHHH ITS A SEKRIT! tell me if i missed anything i think that sums it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigbigadorlou Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Tech Raiding is EVIL!!!!You're immoral. pshh Pink is immoral but last I checked, you don't play halo to shake hands with aliens you play it to MAIM KILL BURN [/ooc? meh almost] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 Misses the mark due to lack of NSO mention. I beat you too eet! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deSouza Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 From what I've seen of Francesca, she is a character that whines about morals all day long no matter how illogical they are. The action she is trying to take against IS is no more or less moral then what IS did to her alliance, she should realize this and do the moral thing and accept white peace from IS. To me, if she continues this course of action she is immoral. They aren't attacking in defense, CG can have peace if they want it, Fran said in her OP that IS offered her peace, she turned it down and instead she is going to start a war of vengeance in order to obtain money from IS. This, is the same as IS did to CG, attacking for money and tech in their tech raid. Fran is immoral. EDIT: fran is immoral What is morality but knowing what is the right thing to do and doing it, regardless of its consequences? The war that IS started is downright wrong, immoral and opportunistic, and not letting them get away with it with a pat in the back is literally the right thing to do. I wonder why you do not realize that Fran took a lot of risks on making the decisions that she made, on putting a 12 man alliance on the line against an alliance twice its size with a protector that is actually well connected, why you keep attempting to attack her character and why you fail to perceive that she is precisely the opposite of immoral... Everyone has their own biases, I suppose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Tolkien Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 What, you don't play Halo to shake hands with aliens? This is morally outrageous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordAkanata Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 ill try my besttl;dr CG; were getting owned! reps plx World; ebil IS! IS; no wai it was just a raiddddd!! Rad; ya man a raid PC; totally a raid World; dude thats totally not a raid CMs/Airforce/Navy/Spais IS; okay w/e they dont have treaties Rad; dude it was totally a raid, i use those things all, the time World; HYPROCRIT BUS DOCTRINE MEANS NOTHING Rad; lolwut IS; we make our own raiding policies jerks! Fort Pitt; Your in direct contradiction of your own policies on raiding IS *evidence* IS; err..... TC; WERE COMING AT UPDATE WATCHOUT BUT SHHHHHHH ITS A SEKRIT! tell me if i missed anything Yeah, that's about right. The last couple pages just has been recycled material of old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperion321 Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 k...so IS is ebil. NSO is going to kill something. Hypocritical doctrine is hypocritical? did i get that right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 (edited) k...so IS is ebil. NSO is going to kill something. Hypocritical doctrine is hypocritical?did i get that right? Well there was the part where I find myself agreeing with NSO in that this action should have been looked at by IS in advance and never taken. EDIT: I hate when I misread something. Edited August 21, 2009 by ChairmanHal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 k...so IS is ebil. NSO is going to kill something. Hypocritical doctrine is hypocritical?did i get that right? As usual, no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gondor Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 So is NSO going to kill something or not? Can't really figure it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigbigadorlou Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 So is NSO going to kill something or not? Can't really figure it out. something tells me NSO is going to war tonight. Or sooner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 So is NSO going to kill something or not? Can't really figure it out. Yes we're going to kill something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heggo Posted August 21, 2009 Report Share Posted August 21, 2009 So is NSO going to kill something or not? Can't really figure it out. Yeah, we're hitting Polar in 20 minutes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.