Jump to content

Ubermeir

Members
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ubermeir

  1. Guy had a war yestetday and noone bothered to ask why?
  2. Whatever good will might have come NPO's way due to any grievance they might be pushing, or multitude of grievances, is mitigated by some of these mindless postings. Oooof!
  3. [quote name='Letum' timestamp='1304704868' post='2707576'] Oh, I understand your point. It would have been easy for us to do "something" and end this war sooner. Hell, we could have just gone full out since January, and we would be in a better position than we are now. My point however is that there's no way we can rationally assume that voluntarily doing (doing, not just offering) a fraction of what you've asked will somehow satisfy you. [/quote] just write "i'm rubbery and you're glue 100 times. According to those posting in here there had never ever been anything done right by the victors and the vanquished are a bunch of angels. I don't care how many times I read it, it rings hollow, and comes off as so much whining for what is essentially light terms. What isn't whining is the threats of retaliation. Seems there will be no forgive and forget. Wait, are the victors supposed to wipe the slate clean as paid in full. Is this part of a new tab?
  4. Welp, if this is the aggressive diatribe we see in defeat...thank admin they didn't win. The rules of NPO on Bob are diminished if not fully gone. Death to contrived cbs. ODN got an apology, GOONS got some reps, and NPO had to fight, a little. These were separate terms come to by separate alliances and all put into one treaty to peace the whole thing out together. Those who came up with their terms did so according to how their alliance sees the world, and that was accepted by the rest of the coalition, most of it is pretty benign and addresses directly the other sides prosecution of the war. No hegemony, each alliance with their own ideas, noone to tell them that there is only one way to think. An improvement if you ask me, despite the pages and pages to bicker that it is being done wrong. It is a free-er world today than it was
  5. Light terms is terrible...zomg! I never ever take these terrible light terms! How dare the ODN ask for anything from ¢oJ! Guess what? ODN pretty much disagrees...light terms, a light response to what is generally felt was a minor inconvenience. Evil evil ODN. Ha!
  6. [quote name='Banedon' timestamp='1304107413' post='2702115'] DH/PB started this war. If you want it to stop then lean on them to give us terms we can live with. Otherwise, deal with it. [/quote] A as member of an alliance that has rated firsthand, and raised the first alarm against, the ruthless nature of the NPO...WUT! No U. Either accept the terms or fight...that is the advice you give your foes, seems fair this is the quarter you receive.
  7. Failed to inform them that some meaningless micro might threaten them? Didn't even cross our minds i would bet. Ha! I would doubt any of them fought in one war, or if they did that act would have resulted in a paltry amount of aid to a protectorate. The fact that anyone else or noone else feels that an apology is neccesary is irrelevant, it is part of some light terms.
  8. It is in the peace terms so it bears some consideration ay the least. Your opinions of these actions withstanding, I don't see it that way. It is my opinion that sending propaganda that had no chance of ever being backed up, to newbs, is poor form and an attempt at making one more relevant than they are. An apology is a small token to pay for a perceived slight. Take it easy.
  9. [quote name='HeroofTime55' timestamp='1303502415' post='2696918'] Actually, we attempted to get "newbish" nations out of harm's way, while ODN was content to use them as meat shields and tech farms for their own purposes. ODN didn't warn their applicants that joining would enter them in a war that they might not like. ODN didn't tell TFE that they were participating in the war by sending aid, and attempted to convince them otherwise. It's [i]our[/i] fault, though, for being the ones to step up and be honest with these new guys. [/quote] They weren't in harms way. Ha! Anyway. Never going to change your mind. Just having a good time at your expense. Light terms is terrible.
  10. They bullied the newbish nations, not ODN, but noone really missed that. As with the messages, yeah funny, funny as in they had no real meaning because they couldn't be backed up, so really pointless. I am laughing at the fight to back that up as meaningful. Hey, carry on whining about how awful the terms are because we don't see it that way. Fill up pages and pages about it have fun. In the end...light terms is light terms no matter how you try and misrepresent...well just about anything that is ever said. Ha! Light terms is terrible.
  11. Yes, a tiny alliance bullying some newbish nations, real honorable, not thinking outside the box, pretending to be more relevant than they are is all. Light terms is sill light terms.
  12. Honorable to threaten newbs with something you could not fulfill. Honorable to not "fully attack" an alliance you never had a chance of beating? Ha! An odd use of the word. But then the troll squad never is interested in truth or real honor, which would have been fully engaging in support of allies and leaving know little newbbs alone. But the troll squad is clearly less interested in actual honor and more interested in feeding the word to their newbs and creating pages of irrelevence. Light terms, the horror.
  13. Fortunately the avg odnista recognizes the troll squad. Light terms and democracy boo...ha!
  14. Oh look ODN wants someone to apologize to one of their protectorates and is a democracy. Wait wut! Terrible. Ha! O/ free speech and light terms.
  15. Golden rule must be roll NPO, do on to others as they have done to you. Check, viceroy, awww viceroy is so despicable it had been outlawed, better just quadruple up on the roling...
  16. [quote name='LJ Scott' timestamp='1295978418' post='2600490'] Because NPO has never re-declared on the same alliance multiple times, even when the initial attack was overkill.... [/quote] If true it must be one of the few things they have not perpetrated.
  17. [quote name='Frederico Rodriguez' timestamp='1295936173' post='2599109'] It's what you're trying to do though, isn't it? Conquer the game by beating down people for no reason other than to be #1 and kill off everyone else? Atleast when NPO dominated, they didn't kill the one big thing CN has going for it, the politics. [/quote] absolutely wrong. This very thread is evidence of the muck that Bob has been saddled with due to NPO dominance. It would be a breath of fresh air to be done with it and not have to listen to the constant revisionist history that takes place here to justify their crimes.
  18. The network hungers. And it grows and grows and grows. [code][code][/code][/code]
  19. [quote name='Vol Navy' timestamp='1286772763' post='2481238'] How? If UPN was being the aggressor as many people seem to be saying then ODN was under no obligation. If they were in a defensive position ODN should have fought it out for them if that's what they asked. Or ODN could have just cancelled the treaty if they didn't want to fight I guess. The behind the back usurping of soverignty was not the correct move imo. [/quote] Working to ebroil an "ally" in a war and then complaining when they resolve the fabrication peacefully is not, in my mind,a good point.
  20. 3mill sent to Nathan24 for 100 tech
  21. [quote name='Methrage' date='07 April 2010 - 07:16 AM' timestamp='1270639000' post='2251527'] It really says something about an alliance's current decision making process when I declare war on them with no treaty and everybody who's posted has wished me luck including their allies. Most people in Gremlins are pretty cool, although you put the worst suited person as leader somehow... [/quote] This is so true. Without prejudice to the legality of your actions, best of luck. Sure beats all the senseless bawwing.
  22. Really not that much to argue about, really noone "put" Iron in this position. If this was not the peace you wanted, did not want the abilty to destroy Gre alone, then why sign the treaty. It has been said that the defeated won because they held out and were strong. But now one 60 person alliance holds you hostage, and it is everyoneelse's fault because you agreed to the peace treaty that would allow you to smite them? Ah, but you can't, maybe Gre should have fought this war all by themselves? Really, the depths people go to in these threads. I do not buy it. Far be it for me to tell someone else what to do. But messing up Gre would be a good start, these words, particularly these words don't seem to be getting anyone very far. Saddle up, lock and load...they are on the battlefield alone...
×
×
  • Create New...