magicninja Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 orly? What was he trying to say and what was his point? He wa saying he was a puppet and loving it thereby mocking you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heyman Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 (edited) orly? What was he trying to say and what was his point? 1) I am a puppet. Edit: Or rather, implied being one. 2) Puppets are sometimes on strings, held commonly by a puppet master. The strings were intended to allude to the quote. 3) I made a facetious remark over the benefits to being a puppet, after establishing the connection between strings and puppets. Edited May 13, 2009 by Heyman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lancer Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Call what you want, bandwagoning ect, but ARES values friendship. I only wish most treaties held friendship in such high regard. o/ ARES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sileath Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 No, he's smarter than that. He's letting his ego overcome that though and that is something that no one should do. I mean he's smart enough to ignore my posts. That has to count for something. So ignoring your posts constitutes intellect? I'd buy that for a dollar! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carter Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 No, he's smarter than that. He's letting his ego overcome that though and that is something that no one should do. I mean he's smart enough to ignore my posts. That has to count for something. Sorry, I missed you inbetween TPF kiddies that desperately need a gag order. They're posts consist of, Krap, Kuddle and Kows and something about thick strings. No, there's just people that disrespect my allies for helping out friends, and their enemies threatening to first strike nuke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keve69 Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 It makes sense. Your irrefutible logic astounds me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gantanX Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Call what you want, bandwagoning ect, but ARES values friendship. I only wish most treaties held friendship in such high regard.o/ ARES couldn't agree more with that but the problem is ARES don't even have treaties with RAD... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Stupid Posted May 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 I don't understand what the discussion is all about. I said in the OP that we didn't have a treaty, yet here we are. Some call it bandwagoning, well I never heard of this alliance before tonight, and even if I did I wasn't expecting this. Friends asked, and friends recieved. That's how friendships work. What good is a piece of paper with a bunch of sigs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Cash Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 i think its funny that some alliances like rad and tfo have trouble pulling off a curb stomp. i mean sure its not like karma has had a lot of practice with it, but this should be easy guys. you shouldnt get to the point where youre asking for help from people you dont even have a treaty with. that is just sad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barix9 Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Woah the trolls are out in hoards tonight! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alekhine Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Sorry, I missed you inbetween TPF kiddies that desperately need a gag order. They're posts consist of, Krap, Kuddle and Kows and something about thick strings.No, there's just people that disrespect my allies for helping out friends, and their enemies threatening to first strike nuke. To be completely honest, I think that the concept of first-strike nuking in this war is completely different than any previous wars I've seen. At least from my point of view, this war has been fully nuclear from the beginning, and I personally didn't think twice about first-strike nuking in my wars, although I was fighting BAPS and I knew that that fight was fully nuclear already. Point is, saying you'll defend ARES from a first-strike nuclear attack from an alliance that they jumped is rather worthless... If you really wanted to fight Avalon, just activate your oA clause with ARES and fight them now, it'd save you from some unnecessary hassle, in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gantanX Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 I don't understand what the discussion is all about. I said in the OP that we didn't have a treaty, yet here we are. Some call it bandwagoning, well I never heard of this alliance before tonight, and even if I did I wasn't expecting this. Friends asked, and friends recieved. That's how friendships work. What good is a piece of paper with a bunch of sigs? now i know where did you get that Name of yours Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Sorry, I missed you inbetween TPF kiddies that desperately need a gag order. They're posts consist of, Krap, Kuddle and Kows and something about thick strings.No, there's just people that disrespect my allies for helping out friends, and their enemies threatening to first strike nuke. First strike nuke is a term that no longer applies to CN Carter. That time is long gone and the era of nuking on site has been established. I don't like people jumping in without treaties. Seems cheap and whorish to me. I already went through the whole argument when Dark Fist done it. Now I won't say you can't do it. Hell you can DoW for whatever reason you want. I just think it's in really poor taste and wonder how they would feel if it was them on the other side. @Sileath Keep replying to my posts. It shows what I said is true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lancer Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 couldn't agree more with thatbut the problem is ARES don't even have treaties with RAD... Never said they did. Is a treaty necessary to enter a conflict? Personally, I'd rather help a friend out than wait until the treaty web hits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barix9 Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 i think its funny that some alliances like rad and tfo have trouble pulling off a curb stomp.i mean sure its not like karma has had a lot of practice with it, but this should be easy guys. you shouldnt get to the point where youre asking for help from people you dont even have a treaty with. that is just sad 69 NS, No Alliance, and a big mouth. Looks like someone learned about curbstomp on the receiving end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carter Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 i think its funny that some alliances like rad and tfo have trouble pulling off a curb stomp.i mean sure its not like karma has had a lot of practice with it, but this should be easy guys. you shouldnt get to the point where youre asking for help from people you dont even have a treaty with. that is just sad Uh, what? Who are you again? Either you're incredibly misinformed or you're just lacking logic, which is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sileath Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Don't forget that one of the reasons why the current political situation is such a cluster$%&@ is that treaties were used as a substitute for friendship. I support the idea of friendship. Why can't we all just get along? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Meanĕ Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Fellows relax and enjoy yourselves it's a celebration of friendship. There is no need to bicker about avalons eventual defeat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barix9 Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Fellows relax and enjoy yourselves it's a celebration of friendship. There is no need to bicker about avalons eventual defeat. I agree, three cheers for the person with Palin in the avitar! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vol Navy Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 To be completely honest, I think that the concept of first-strike nuking in this war is completely different than any previous wars I've seen. At least from my point of view, this war has been fully nuclear from the beginning, and I personally didn't think twice about first-strike nuking in my wars, although I was fighting BAPS and I knew that that fight was fully nuclear already. Point is, saying you'll defend ARES from a first-strike nuclear attack from an alliance that they jumped is rather worthless... If you really wanted to fight Avalon, just activate your oA clause with ARES and fight them now, it'd save you from some unnecessary hassle, in my opinion. Ding ding ding. This war was nuke hot from the start of the 25th hour. I took my first while locked out in the server crash within seconds of becoming eligible for a strike. I ran out a week ago and they are still falling on me like rain. It's actually pretty fun, infra, land, tech, it can all be recovered. Millions of war dead have to be earned in the fire. I honestly can't believe that anyone would act upset over the prospect of nukes falling. Especially since they are fighting along side Poison Clan and MK in this. Those guys have their finger on the nuke button as soon as war is discussed. Let alone when they get declared on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Cato Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Congrats to Both Ares and Rad! o/ ARES o/ Rad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Uh, what? Who are you again?Either you're incredibly misinformed or you're just lacking logic, which is it? See this is another thing I can't stand in debating in this forum. People seem to like to say you have bad logic or that you are stupid without telling you why they think that way. It's pathetic. Stop doing it. If you feel he is wrong tell him why. What I don't get is why these alliances that are declaring for "friends" don't have treaties with their "friends". What? The !@#$ has to hit the fan before you realize that they might be worth fighting with? I don;t think "they're my friends so I'm attacking you is a good enough reason." Anyone can say that about anyone. That is why there is supposed to be treaties between real friends. To prevent this sort of shameless bandwagoning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keve69 Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 I personally believe that the CN community places too much emphasis on the treaties and not enough emphasis on the relationships.... ARES felt like it was in their friends (and fellow Karma alliance I remind you) best interests to jump in against Avalon. While yes jumping to help someone without a signed treaty is rather unorthodox in the CN it is not entirely unheard of, plus where does it say treaties are a REQUIREMENT to help out another alliance? At least ARES had the decency to make a DoW before attacking, something which other alliances have not always done (Ask OV about it). O/ FRIENDSHIP > PAPER o/ ARES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carter Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 To be completely honest, I think that the concept of first-strike nuking in this war is completely different than any previous wars I've seen. At least from my point of view, this war has been fully nuclear from the beginning, and I personally didn't think twice about first-strike nuking in my wars, although I was fighting BAPS and I knew that that fight was fully nuclear already. Point is, saying you'll defend ARES from a first-strike nuclear attack from an alliance that they jumped is rather worthless... If you really wanted to fight Avalon, just activate your oA clause with ARES and fight them now, it'd save you from some unnecessary hassle, in my opinion. Eh, you have a good point. But since it's already said, I'll follow through. To be honest, if Avalon chose not to use nukes/threaten to use nukes then we wouldn't be have this discussion. Fair enough though, they have a right to defend themselves with nukes and I'm not denying it. Just as we have the right to defend our allies who reached out to our friends in their time of need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vol Navy Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 I personally believe that the CN community places too much emphasis on the treaties and not enough emphasis on the relationships.... ARES felt like it was in their friends (and fellow Karma alliance I remind you) best interests to jump in against Avalon. While yes jumping to help someone without a signed treaty is rather unorthodox in the CN it is not entirely unheard of, plus where does it say treaties are a REQUIREMENT to help out another alliance? At least ARES had the decency to make a DoW before attacking, something which other alliances have not always done (Ask OV about it).O/ FRIENDSHIP > PAPER o/ ARES It's fine and well I guess, but in the future expect much chaos and tech/land raiding to occur through this practice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.