Neboe Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 So because you do not agree with those actions, you decide to close an embassy? Kinda sad IMO. While I think I see the point you are getting at, this is not a simple case of disagreement about what to eat for lunch. The Mushroom Kingdom in making this decision is sending a clear message that treaties should be worth more than the paper they're written on. MK is indicating that they have a fundamental disagreement with the behaviors exhibited by these alliances. It is sad actually. It is sad that these alliances chose a path that diverts so far from the path of the MK, that the MK feels the need to take their own action. It is sad for both the Mushroom Kingdom and the affected alliances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 MK has no honor not now not ever. Also, Nemesis has a similar policy in place as of last night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 That would make for very good trolling if you posted it in any thread but this one. Meh by the number of responses it was only so-so trolling I guess. Better luck to me next time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejayrazz Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 So because you do not agree with those actions, you decide to close an embassy? Kinda sad IMO. Actions have lead to the closing of embassies in the past. It isn't sad, it is making a statement without causing harm to no one. What should they do? Attack them? So then you really would have something to complain about, ahha? Na dude, what they are doing is perfectly acceptable and logical, I would understand if they ever chose this route with my alliance if we acted so dishonorably. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freedomfight3r Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 I do love you guys at MK. ^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Mao Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 o/ MK. Completely appropriate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hombre de Murcielago Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Who could have predicted that ditching your ally in their hour of need would have any ramifications... wierd. Good show MK! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
white majik Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Good show MK o/ Aqua love Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guffey Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 MK, you have my greatest respect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Much deserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Emares Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 This deserves respect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydro Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Given their initial action, yes they do. But they will probably be the first one re-opened. That's too bad because they only decided to do the right thing becayse if they didn't they'd never be able to sign a treaty with any half-way decent alliance again. What could be more cowardly though, !@#$ting your pants and betraying your allies in their greatest time hour of need and then when everyone calls you out, you !@#$ your pants again and do a 180? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Stalin Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 What about GDA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentxOrchestra Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Very classy. o/ MK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalTrevor Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 What about GDA They do not hold an embassy with the Mushroom Kingdom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Stalin Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 They do not hold an embassy with the Mushroom Kingdom. Ah. Well I'm guessing they won't be getting one any time soon either, then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hobbies0310 Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Too bad half of them are gonna run from the war Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piepbal Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 So can these alliances get their embassies back when they honor their treaties and slaughter your allies? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Roboto Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Hope to see more of this to come. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Why is Echelon on that list though? They stood by their treaty partners...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylar Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 Why is Echelon on that list though? They stood by their treaty partners...? Only after they saw the public outcry did they turn around and decide to defend their "allies" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bralor Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 So what, you're trying to push them into supporting NPO? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dracule Mihawk1 Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 So what, you're trying to push them into supporting NPO? They're supporting their values over what may or may not be practical for this war. If that pushes alliances into fighting alongside NPO, so be it. Such is honour. o/ MK -Drac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bralor Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 They're supporting their values over what may or may not be practical for this war. If that pushes alliances into fighting alongside NPO, so be it. Such is honour.o/ MK -Drac Fair enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiabelly Posted April 22, 2009 Report Share Posted April 22, 2009 You have great respect for us in MK if you believe that a closure of an MK embassy could force an alliance into such a shame spiral that they they do a double reverse pike in the flip flop position and go back to honouring their treaties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.