Adrian LaCroix Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 I have this distinct feeling that someone is doing it wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fupresti Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 How about we start a new rule in CN. In order to be government of an alliance you must be old enough to pack your own lunch and stop drinking your beverages from a sippy cup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyriq Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 Learn from history..DE was made of 4 failing alliances... Fail + Fail + Fail + Fail does not equal win.. And merge a quadrouple-phail with an another alliance and your asking for trouble. This thread proves it :lol: Someone said TDE needed better leadership, I thought of Nemesis. Really though these guys seem like a overall cool group and the edited OP kind of touched me. I hope they don't suffer from this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twodivine Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 There's no locks requests any longer. Bad PR is now Bad PR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroicDisaster Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 I'm sorry to say it, but your alliance's actions are more amusing than his trolling. Beat me to it. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 Merge with Nemesis, problem solved. No. Signed, All of Nemesis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 Merge with Nemesis, problem solved. You just made my day. Also this thread has served its purpose and there's no OP anymore, even though there's no more author's rights this thread just needs to be closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joracy Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 No.Signed, All of Nemesis Probably a smart plan... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terminal Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 No.Signed, All of Nemesis Marry me. This thread just gets better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caesar833 Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 You just made my day.Also this thread has served its purpose and there's no OP anymore, even though there's no more author's rights this thread just needs to be closed. This was my point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomInterrupt Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 I think my favorite part about this is the fact that the DE guy who decided to raid Global League of Protectorates has this in his nation bio "Imperial Officer of Foreign Affairs". The Dark Evolution seems like a really great alliance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magicalbricks Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 Good luck GLOP..i already helped you out by making 4 of their nations glow... hopefully you can finish the hurting bombs.. if declaring on alliances weaker than you makes you great.... well.. you need help. Grow some balls DE. QFT poor show DE..... very poor show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfHoward Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 I'm glad both sides found a peaceful solution. Oh wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernkastel Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 (edited) I think my favorite part about this is the fact that the DE guy who decided to raid Global League of Protectorates has this in his nation bio "Imperial Officer of Foreign Affairs".The Dark Evolution seems like a really great alliance. Hunter tried to cancel all of DefCon's treaties... threatened to do so anyway. Coolgreen has no spine, wouldn't pay $16mil in reps so had DefCon cornered and intimidated by NATO and UPN. In the end we got all $16mil, but it took a lot of work. Ryan Reyes authorized nuclear attacks on a DefCon Govt. Member. Terminal, who was in DE govt, attacked said DefCon Govt. Member. All this happened in November 2008, in backchannels obviously. DE = winning at failing. Edited February 21, 2009 by Balsamic Vinegar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackSkellington Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 They are a good alliance and just as good for an ally as any other alliance. They made a mistake, just as all of us can do. This is a situation where they are embarrassed by their mistake. We have all been there and all felt the same feeling. The same want for people to just let it go after the apology was presented. Instead, here you all are continuing to talk about how this is idiotic and bad PR for DE. If anyone understands that, it's DE at this point. How about we give them a break? The same one we always wish we were given when in a similar situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankees Empire Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 In before lines are drawn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terminal Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 (edited) Hunter tried to cancel all of DefCon's treaties... threatened to do so anyway.Coolgreen has no spine, wouldn't pay $16mil in reps so had DefCon cornered and intimidated by NATO and UPN. In the end we got all $16mil, but it took a lot of work. Ryan Reyes authorized nuclear attacks on a DefCon Govt. Member. Terminal, who was in DE govt, attacked said DefCon Govt. Member. All this happened in November 2008. DE = winning at failing. Well, i sort of apologize for that now. I hope that i can probably become more friendly with DefCon about this; especially since in the past 7 days ive sent out 19 nukes to 5 DE nations. However, i cant pay you reps if you still would like them. My couragious decisions have given me a ZI order by DE. Ultimately though, i find it a victory causing over $400 Mil in damage and them only acheiving less than half of that to me. Edited February 21, 2009 by Terminal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jer Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 $20 donation says it's a joke now, whether it was initially or not. I was actually expecting his younger brother to have made this announcement, or something along those lines. Oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomInterrupt Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 They are a good alliance and just as good for an ally as any other alliance. They made a mistake, just as all of us can do. This is a situation where they are embarrassed by their mistake. We have all been there and all felt the same feeling. The same want for people to just let it go after the apology was presented. Instead, here you all are continuing to talk about how this is idiotic and bad PR for DE. If anyone understands that, it's DE at this point. How about we give them a break? The same one we always wish we were given when in a similar situation. Ah, I remember that time I raided an alliance for fun while I was running my alliance's FA, and then another one of my alliance leaders issued a DoW in the middle of the day and thought it would be funny. Errr, wait no I don't. No, this is not a thing that happens to everyone. It's not even just one member being stupid. This is not normal and it is not a thing that everyone will just forget. I know almost nothing about these guys before this thread, but clearly the alliance is sick and more than a simple apology is owed to the alliance that was attacked, and to the public to know that this will not happen again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernkastel Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 Well, i sort of apologize for that now. I hope that i can probably become more friendly with DefCon about this; especially since in the past 7 days ive sent out 19 nukes to 5 DE nations.However, i cant pay you reps if you still would like them. My couragious decisions have given me a ZI order by DE. Ultimately though, i find it a victory causing over $400 Mil in damage and them only acheiving less than half of that to me. Don't worry 'bout it. You made some DE glow like Christmas lights especially a glowing Hunter, that's the best gift you could ever give. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackSkellington Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 No where in my post did I state that we have all made the SAME mistake. I stated we all have made mistakes. Nor did I say we should all forget it. I merely stated we should just lay off of them. Which is simply no longer posting in this thread with comments that are the same as the general amount of comments in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabonnobar Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 (edited) DE = winning at failing. Is this me, agreeing with the maka? Why yes, yes it is. Edited February 21, 2009 by rabonnobar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kindom of Goon Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 They are a good alliance and just as good for an ally as any other alliance. They made a mistake, just as all of us can do. This is a situation where they are embarrassed by their mistake. We have all been there and all felt the same feeling. The same want for people to just let it go after the apology was presented. Instead, here you all are continuing to talk about how this is idiotic and bad PR for DE. If anyone understands that, it's DE at this point. How about we give them a break? The same one we always wish we were given when in a similar situation. Um, no we have not "all been there". Very few have been in a "similar situation". And I dont care what anyone says or whether DE try to make hunter the scape goat, this is not something a gov member decides to do of their own accord. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terminal Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 Can we stop talking about it.. and actually roll DE now? im getting tired, so im off.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Soviet Attack Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 Um, no we have not "all been there". Very few have been in a "similar situation". And I dont care what anyone says or whether DE try to make hunter the scape goat, this is not something a gov member decides to do of their own accord. You've never made a mistake and regretted it? Wowza. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts