East Prussia Posted May 21, 2011 Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 Hopefully our allies will show there true self's /o TTK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelios Posted May 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 [quote name='lazaraus45' timestamp='1306002644' post='2716165'] There is great potential for some good surrender terms at the end of this war [/quote] I hope you dont mean on this side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikeyrox Posted May 21, 2011 Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 (edited) [quote name='jammar' timestamp='1306005023' post='2716180'] I'm wonder, unless I misread some numbers RE got more ns, higher ans, more nukes and around the same amount of nations as G-6 and TTK together. How'd you manage to keep the unfair war bawwers out of your topic? [/quote] We are a bit stronger than them, but the differences are not that great. Here are the pre-blitz stats: Roman Empire nations: 63 NS: 323,973 ANS: 5,142 Nukes: 41 G-6 and TTK Nations: 65 NS: 295,500 ANS: 4,546 Nukes: 14 The total NS difference is about 28k - or about 6 5k nations, which is not that big a difference. They have two more nations than we do, so sure, there is a discrepancy of about 4 nations worth of NS, but hey, I am sure G-6s stellar update activity can make up for it. Our ANS is higher (though by the time we took the stats, some of our nations were already beefing up for the blitz, increasing it some). There is a nuke discrepancy, sure, but it is not easy to find a small alliance with a lot of nukes - hell it aint easy to find many alliances to fill in the gap period that have not warred recently. We also expect xXx to counter us over this, adding some more NS to their side at tonight's blitz. Edited May 21, 2011 by Mikeyrox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Klusman Posted May 21, 2011 Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 I don't want to see any crying here G-6 got way better odds then the Kiwi's did from the Big Fark! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiccan high priest Posted May 21, 2011 Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 [quote name='lazaraus45' timestamp='1306002644' post='2716165'] There is great potential for some good surrender terms at the end of this war [/quote] nope no surrender here, Its rapture time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADude Posted May 21, 2011 Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 (edited) Surrender terms for G-6 nations 1: Swap to AA "Toga Girls" 2: Peace out Its just that simple. [color="#FF0000"]Joking of course, i hope this turns out to be a great war. [/color] Edited May 21, 2011 by ADude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazaraus45 Posted May 21, 2011 Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Judge X' timestamp='1306004449' post='2716173'] You guys are planning on surrendering already? [img]http://cache.ohinternet.com/images/3/30/MrSockpuppet.jpg[/img] [/quote] DoW aren't involved in this conflict, so no, we're not [quote name='paul711' timestamp='1306005712' post='2716187'] Because it is called "just desserts". [/quote] Youre bitterness is showing, for someone who constantly says "let's build fences and be friends cause OP can't go 2 rounds without declaring on noob AA's who've been in existence for over 2 rounds" you sure do a lot of @$^%posting, do the OWF decency a favour and shed your tears elsewhere Paul, you spend your time stalking announcements that have even the slightest possibility of involving confusion, it;s extremely sad, have you considered a hiatus maybe, or even just a walk outside, i worry about you [quote name='Stelios' timestamp='1306008330' post='2716207'] I hope you dont mean on this side [/quote] of course not, i meant G-6 accepting the terms of making you puppets Edited May 21, 2011 by lazaraus45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikeyrox Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='lazaraus45' timestamp='1306021466' post='2716286'] of course not, i meant G-6 accepting the terms of making you puppets [/quote] They better! The Roman Empire will not stop until we are once again made the lackeys of G-6! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dockingscheduled Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 (edited) [quote name='lazaraus45' timestamp='1306002644' post='2716165'] There is great potential for some good surrender terms at the end of this war [/quote] will you actually be fighting for g-6 or will you be sticking with the dogs of war AA? Edited May 22, 2011 by dockingscheduled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir pwnage Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='lazaraus45' timestamp='1306002644' post='2716165'] There is great potential for some good surrender terms at the end of this war [/quote] I'd like to see all RE members join "G-6 Applicant" to show their subservience properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieG Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='dockingscheduled' timestamp='1306025639' post='2716306'] will you actually be fighting for g-6 or will you be sticking with the dogs of war AA? [/quote] Will PS be fighting, after being out of war for nearly 20 days? One that you didnt take much damage from either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chauncey Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Lord Klusman' timestamp='1306014109' post='2716240'] I don't want to see any crying here G-6 got way better odds then the Kiwi's did from the Big Fark! [/quote] Have you seen one G-6er complain yet? No, you know why... Because we expected this. You see, we G-6er's are are only looking out for RE's best interests. No matter what RE wants, we know whats best for them. This isn't easy for us, seeing the pain in their eyes, seeing them try to fight it. But RE, we just... we don't want you anymore! Get! Go away, don't you understand? Go! You're free now! Why don't you understand?! This may illustrate what I mean the best... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APutwJMShYU&NR=1#t=3m58s (Oh, and yeah, nostalgia much?) Edited May 22, 2011 by Chaunce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieG Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 (edited) Current nations over [b]10[/b]k NS: RE 5. G6/TTK 1 (XxX have none) Current nations over 9k NS: RE 8. G6/TTK 5 (XxX have none) Current nations over 8k NS: RE 12. G6/TTK 5 (XxX have 1 more) Current nations over 7k NS: RE 16. G6/TTK 7 (XxX have 2 more) Current nations over 6k NS: RE 24. G6/TTK 12 (XxX have 3 more) Current nations over 5k NS: RE 31. G6/TTK 23 (XxX have 4 more) Just saying its a bit lop sided in the upper tier. And then theres the nukes. edited bold Edited May 22, 2011 by StevieG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schad Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='StevieG' timestamp='1306028704' post='2716323'] Will PS be fighting, after being out of war for nearly 20 days? One that you didnt take much damage from either. [/quote] Nope. We're done with that war thing. Mint julep, anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therm Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='StevieG' timestamp='1306029673' post='2716331'] Current nations over 7k NS: RE 5. G6/TTK 1 (XxX have none) Current nations over 9k NS: RE 8. G6/TTK 5 (XxX have none) Current nations over 8k NS: RE 12. G6/TTK 5 (XxX have 1 more) Current nations over 7k NS: RE 16. G6/TTK 7 (XxX have 2 more) Current nations over 6k NS: RE 24. G6/TTK 12 (XxX have 3 more) Current nations over 5k NS: RE 31. G6/TTK 23 (XxX have 4 more) Just saying its a bit lop sided in the upper tier. And then theres the nukes. [/quote] Let me help you with those numbers. Current nations over [b]10[/b]k NS: RE 5. G6/TTK 1 (Yay me, I'm going to be on top5 NS lost again) (XxX have none) Current nations over 9k NS: RE 8. G6/TTK 5 (XxX have none) Current nations over 8k NS: RE 12. G6/TTK 5 (XxX have 1 more) Current nations over 7k NS: RE 16. G6/TTK 7 (XxX have 2 more) Current nations over 6k NS: RE 24. G6/TTK 12 (XxX have 3 more) Current nations over 5k NS: RE 31. G6/TTK 23 (XxX have 4 more) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieG Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='Schad' timestamp='1306029683' post='2716332'] Nope. We're done with that war thing. Mint julep, anyone? [/quote] Im sure what you are planning is big I mean, theres a !@#$ ton of nukes around in some AAs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schad Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='StevieG' timestamp='1306030268' post='2716337'] Im sure what you are planning is big I mean, theres a !@#$ ton of nukes around in some AAs [/quote] You coaxed it out of me...we're selling off all of our infra and hitting Firesprites, The Black Hand and Terran Empire2 at update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieG Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='Schad' timestamp='1306030998' post='2716351'] You coaxed it out of me...we're selling off all of our infra and hitting Firesprites, The Black Hand and Terran Empire2 at update. [/quote] The black hand is at war already, you evil Ninjas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schad Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='StevieG' timestamp='1306031138' post='2716352'] The black hand is at war already, you evil Ninjas. [/quote] Damn...guess we'll have to take three weeks and come up with a new plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADude Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='StevieG' timestamp='1306029673' post='2716331'] Current nations over [b]10[/b]k NS: RE 5. G6/TTK 1 (XxX have none) Current nations over 9k NS: RE 8. G6/TTK 5 (XxX have none) Current nations over 8k NS: RE 12. G6/TTK 5 (XxX have 1 more) Current nations over 7k NS: RE 16. G6/TTK 7 (XxX have 2 more) Current nations over 6k NS: RE 24. G6/TTK 12 (XxX have 3 more) Current nations over 5k NS: RE 31. G6/TTK 23 (XxX have 4 more) Just saying its a bit lop sided in the upper tier. And then theres the nukes. edited bold [/quote] Now yes, but please don't take stats from after the blitz. At the time of the blitz RE 1000510|Mr Limpit|Fishbolle|5/21/2011 12:00:52 AM| [b]11,303.614[/b] 1000242|Zulqarnain|Zyphorious|5/20/2011 12:12:26 AM [b]10,580.323[/b] 1000485|commando|Commando|5/19/2011 6:12:30 AM [b]10,363.642 [/b] G-6/TTK 1000433|Torpedo Ted|World 11|5/16/2011 12:00:42 AM [b]10,423.206[/b] 1000073|Wario10|Wario Land|5/20/2011 12:00:29 AM| [b]10,385.097[/b] 1000372|Toadhead|Toadheadian|5/20/2011 5:41:22 AM| [b]12,086.103[/b] And thats it for RE, G-6 and TTK 10K and above. I have the stat file if you want to look it over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiccan high priest Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 soooooooooooo in other words, since rapures been delayed we keep fighting... cool deal... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wabooz Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 sigh, i was hoping to get out of the lawn work tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieG Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='ADude' timestamp='1306035361' post='2716402'] Now yes, but please don't take stats from after the blitz. At the time of the blitz RE 1000510|Mr Limpit|Fishbolle|5/21/2011 12:00:52 AM| [b]11,303.614[/b] 1000242|Zulqarnain|Zyphorious|5/20/2011 12:12:26 AM [b]10,580.323[/b] 1000485|commando|Commando|5/19/2011 6:12:30 AM [b]10,363.642 [/b] G-6/TTK 1000433|Torpedo Ted|World 11|5/16/2011 12:00:42 AM [b]10,423.206[/b] 1000073|Wario10|Wario Land|5/20/2011 12:00:29 AM| [b]10,385.097[/b] 1000372|Toadhead|Toadheadian|5/20/2011 5:41:22 AM| [b]12,086.103[/b] And thats it for RE, G-6 and TTK 10K and above. I have the stat file if you want to look it over. [/quote] Id be interested to see the numbers down to 6k Would give a good representation of how effective your blitz was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul711 Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 [quote name='lazaraus45' timestamp='1306021466' post='2716286'] Youre bitterness is showing, for someone who constantly says "let's build fences and be friends cause OP can't go 2 rounds without declaring on noob AA's who've been in existence for over 2 rounds" you sure do a lot of @$^%posting, do the OWF decency a favour and shed your tears elsewhere Paul, you spend your time stalking announcements that have even the slightest possibility of involving confusion, [u]it;s[/u] extremely sad, have you considered a hiatus maybe, or even just a walk outside, [u]i[/u] worry about you [/quote] I have never offered to mend any fences with you, hell I don't even like you and I know the feeling is mutual. Why don't you climb out of Confusion's shadow, create an AA and then try talking tough on the OWF. Maybe you should worry more about your punctuation and less about me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazaraus45 Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 (edited) [quote name='paul711' timestamp='1306090825' post='2716668'] I have never offered to mend any fences with you, hell I don't even like you and I know the feeling is mutual. Why don't you climb out of Confusion's shadow, create an AA and then try talking tough on the OWF. Maybe you should worry more about your punctuation and less about me. [/quote] I recall differently, you even invited me to join OP remember when i mentioned i was disbanding SF? but then you talk so much i'm not surprised you don't remember half of it, as for Confusions shadow, that's laughable and show's how clueless you are, i have led an AA, took it to it's peak height, talked tough, got back-chatted and then stomped on the guys AA, that guy's AA being legale coupable, remember who led that one? but my age old feuds with confusion are in the past, onto the present, how exactly am i in Confusions shadow? Edit: also rule of thumb for OWF debates, if someone has to target your punctuation to feel like they're winning a point, they usually have a terrible argument Edited May 22, 2011 by lazaraus45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts