Petrovich4

Good luck EJ. Enjoy the wars.

Time to

Stop growing - we can't shake you. Also, congrats

[b]TENSION = INTEREST[/b] 'But why have spy limits? Why not let anyone spy on anyone? Why not let anyone declare on anyone? These NS limits keep half the game's player from having much of any effect on the other half. They need to be removed or greatly relaxed. Nukes need to be un-nerfed. The 24hr rule is really dumb because it removes one of the biggest potential sources of tension in the game. Instead of being seen as the unstoppable, possibly devestating first-strike weapon that they should be, nukes are now just another tool in the conventional arsenal. Effective, but fairly ho-hum. No one cares if an alliance bulks up on nukes because they know that they can't be hit with them for the first 24 hours after a declaration, so they'll have plenty of chance to try to nuke first. And the "you can only be nuked once a day" rule is also stupid. That really destroyed the nuke's place as an interesting game changer. Nukes and war in general would be a truly harcore prospect to most of the players if it was possible to go from 6000 infra to 2000 infra in a single day with a first-strike sneak attack. It would add a great degree of tension to the game. [b]TENSION = INTEREST.[/b] Ditto on all of that for Air strikes. Just limit how many aircraft you can buy per day related to your infrastructure and technology. $%&@, nukes should have a chance of damaging or destroying improvements or wonders, for that matter. That would REALLY spice up the game.' [quote name='Ejayrazz' timestamp='1285380549' post='2463813'] Over 4.5 years. I've been here since Feb of 06, I am 4.7. haha. [/quote] I thought you've been here since Autumn 2006??

[quote name='We Are Not Alone' timestamp='1284515716' post='2454231'] Personally I feel RIA will be sanctioned within the year. They sure know how to post some solid stats and even though they lose a lot of their bigger nations they still have a lot of active nations and Ogaden (james dahl) is recruiting like crazy and the rest of their gov't is getting active and putting them in a super FA spot where they will be protected indefinetly. Also obligatory o/ C-zom [/quote] I love RIA due to my past life (and this one ). I do think the latter part of your statement is unintentionally a potential negative for the alliance. Being in a super FA spot is generally not good. Your FA department and 'international drive' will slacken with the gluttony of being in a super FA spot where the chance of laziness will increase. If you are not in a 'totally secure' FA spot, then you are always on your toes, which keeps your wits sharp. Plus, look at us. We have no explicit binds to anyone, yet no one - at the moment - will touch us. But we can touch you

[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1284670562' post='2455990'] As long as we climb the ranks together, I don't mind being just behind FAN [/quote] We like to be surrounded with ppl we love and fluffy teddy bears. Thanks Gopher!

First, we have to continue to pull away from MCXA. TOOL you're next. See you in about 8 weeks. Unless of course we pick a fight with someone.

Soon NV, soon.

Let us roll UPN.

Congratulations NoR and Nemesis.

::nods:: All the best.

Congratulations NATO.

[quote name='Ashoka the Great' timestamp='1283700930' post='2442620'] Aid a rogue attacking a Nordreich nation. Win a free war. [/quote] Yes, someone please take Ash's offer! FAN's sharks are always circling and are maybe, possibly, hopefully, probably willing to back up the prize being offered by NoR.

[quote name='Swanfield' timestamp='1282061235' post='2419716'] Mushroom Kingdom, you have to remember that no empire lasts forever. Remember a certain red alliance called New Pacific Order? Nobody thought they would ever fall. [/quote] You are explicitly threatening another alliance by calling for their future downfall - get me more popcorn here! Do you plan on working with that agenda in mind as a member of m government, you political noob? Please MK, crush him/them.

Well done m, I love the strategic hole some of your members are digging. I would love to contribute and exacerbate the situation, but I believe there are other people more gifted in assertions on your side that are doing the job. Keep it up! ::thumbs up::

[quote name='Sandwich Controversy' timestamp='1282059692' post='2419667'] That is correct, we are in fact the "biggest boy". [/quote] ::nods:: May I strongly suggest you start using the stick... CN can only eat only so many carrots OP: Congrats on the political victory and huge political capital you earned from this.

Well done STA, I like your style.

Just submitted my info - thank you to those who have set this up I can switch to Black once I'm in a circle. Thank you kindly Petro

[quote name='Ashoka the Great' timestamp='1281874412' post='2416586'] He had a lot of people play along with him, and I haven't forgotten 'Who's Who'. Some have done their best to atone for it, and have admitted they made a mistake. Others would like to think that the matter is long-forgotten. It isn't. [/quote] Good to know that some people can ask for forgiveness - or at least understanding. For others that have swept it under the rug themselves, well, I hope you never forget as well.

Your articles were amazing for the wit and humour [i]you[/i] put in them. Everyone enjoyed reading them. Some people just didn't enjoy the contents (I did!).

Gold and gems here!

On a different note, congrats to all, and most especially Blue

For the 492nd time, it was Nov and Dec 2006. The drama in front of and behind the main scene, plus all the new colour alliances emerging....good times! Favourite personal memory is talking with mah ppls on irc in my alliance back in the first quarter of 2007. Great group of intriguing people

Gold and gems here please http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=173452

I have gold and gems if you need a backup. Really looking for a trade circle! Thank you in advance