Canik

OMGZ U GAVE A FORMER MEMBER TEH FINGERRR! Seriously, if a member did all that to us, they wouldn't BE in another alliance, they'd be ZIed! THEN we would give them the finger. lol @ fake moral outrage

BFF is MDAP whereas CDT is MDoAP. As of now though, aye, all BFF members are also CDT members.

It's cool, KaitlinK has you covered. XD That would just be crazy. You're supposed to hit barriers right before million marks. Are you new or something? ADI doesn't follow the rules.

o/ ADI Best calendar on CN right thar. Keep up the awesome work!

Stupid Newbie http://www.cybernations.net/allNations_dis...Stupid%20Newbie I expected more from them.

o/ Wolfpack Now, let us feast!

This was in planning when the TDO-ADI incident erupted, hence FEAR's heavy support for ADI.

It's quite simple: private channels FTW. Anyway, I understand where you are coming from but disagree that if someone makes a cancellation that they need to explain why to anyone but the people they are canceling on.

First of all, it's not really FEAR's place. It's not our evidence. Secondly, this doesn't change the fact that asking for peace and evidence/arguments to be made public, is silly. EDIT: To clarify, asking for peace alone, or evidence alone, is not silly. It's when you're asking for both at the same time.

o/ UCN Two years already? How time flies... you, UCN I'll try to be there for some games.

Congratulations to myself, for finding such great friends in ADI.

Silly people, you call for peace and evidence at the same time. You know peace is easier to accomplish via private channels. As Hoo said, if it comes to war then evidence will be presented, and there is plenty of it for the issue had been going on several months. ADI has repeatedly requested during that time that TDO simply stop. That's all, just stop. RoK requested it as well, TDO never did anything about it, and that's why we're here today.

It depends on what the member of gov did. If they did something worthy of being attacked, then demotion is a compromise. EDIT: Being neutral does not necessarily mean being innocent.

A reactionary move based on little information. Still, I commend you for standing up for neutrality. As I said in the RoK announcement, FEAR normally respects an alliance's right to a peaceful existence, even if we disagree with it. We signed GPA's DoGN, MAD's DoGN, never canceled either of those, and TDO's DoGN during the NSO fiasco. In support of TDO.

FEAR normally supports an alliance's right to a peaceful existence. However, it's TDO that is disturbing the peace now. It's up to TDO what happens next.

An announcement from the Fellowship of Elite Allied Republics Greetings, Cyberverse. I am here today to announce that as of now, FEAR has voted and withdrawn it's signature from TDO's Declaration of Global Neutrality. Reasons have been given in private. That is all. Signed - Canik, Grand Chancellor Turetel, Internal Chancellor Clash, External Chancellor ~ The Elite Assemby ~

Aww, too bad. I needed this war. Oh well, I had allies on both sides so at least I didn't have to deal with that drama. Good to see this resolved.

I hope all the sanctioned alliances stop recognizing people under 200 members (Athens), and start attacking them! And now that would truly be interesting.

Now I'm just asking out of pure curiosity, not even 1-2 man alliances? Surely NSO allows those. Either way, I am surprised. My hats off to you, NSO.

I'd like to hear NSO's official position on this. XD Anyway, I'm not saying NPO would have protected this alliance, I'm just saying that their presence caused people to think twice about taking such bold action. Maybe things are more entertaining this way, but it's at the expense of this small alliance.

No, but now some of the Karma alliances are challenging the status quo. Something people were scared to do with NPO around, even if NPO had nothing to do with these general rules the community accepts. Such as, a 40 man alliance is big enough to be recognized by most of us. So it's not okay to attack them just for tech. Thing is, there was nothing wrong with the status quo.

Hehe, so naive. Things weren't so bad under NPO, it just got old seeing them on top. All these efforts by NSO, Stickmen, Athens, etc, this is your revolution. Hope you're happy.

I don't feel being a lulzy alliance has anything to do with organization necessarily, it is their foreign affairs and motivations that make it a lulzy alliance. That being said, I personally, from what I've seen of SLCB, would describe them as a lulzy alliance.

EDIT: Whoops, took me a second to realize what you meant by the spelling. Well then no, I don't know Kommander. I knew Kommando.

Congrats to our brothers of great fluffy sexiness!