Jump to content

WarriorConcept

Members
  • Posts

    5,803
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WarriorConcept

  1. [quote name='Johjima' date='01 February 2010 - 12:27 AM' timestamp='1265002042' post='2149724'] Indeed, brand your alliance as one that attacks a downed opponent. It's good of you to show your colors to the world. [/quote] I brand them as the alliance that defended their allies from unwarranted attacks and war. Good colors for anyone to wear.
  2. Good job helping your allies. Have fun out there.
  3. Good on you for defending your ally. Have fun.
  4. [quote name='Methrage' date='31 January 2010 - 11:28 PM' timestamp='1264998492' post='2149572'] Not really, I can see what your doing. [/quote] you're* (it's a pet peeve sue me but it's not that damn hard to know when to use the right one)
  5. Good job on answering the call from your ally DF. Ignore the tough talk from the rest.
  6. [quote name='Watson895' date='31 January 2010 - 11:06 PM' timestamp='1264997160' post='2149501'] We don't expect that. [/quote] I did say hope
  7. [quote name='Stumpy Jung Il' date='31 January 2010 - 11:04 PM' timestamp='1264997064' post='2149496'] I don't know if IRON has enough empty slots to really have a good blitz against them. [/quote] Maybe they're hoping IRON's allies will actually defend IRON?
  8. [quote name='Elyat' date='31 January 2010 - 11:00 PM' timestamp='1264996851' post='2149485'] It's almost as hilarious as when you crapped all over our thread to make some point about how you'd defend alliances you weren't tied to even though you never have. [/quote] It's more hilarious the fact that there are logs that NSO asked for assistance from FAN and Ivan confirmed it in this very thread.
  9. [quote name='D2theMcV' date='31 January 2010 - 09:09 PM' timestamp='1264990180' post='2149081'] This definitely explains some...odd...PM's I've started receiving about a month or so ago. Vague promises of "rising to heights you may never achieve in Farkistan" and things of that nature. I'm not going to name any names, but a couple appear on Ceasar's list. I wasn't really sure what was happening, but was told to wait, and I'd see. Well, I see something now. But what I'm not really sure. The people I'd normally turn to, I no longer trust. People can speculate about this being "fake" or some sort of treaty announcement, but I can assure you, things have gotten really out of control inside Fark. Not only do I feel betrayed by people who obviously misrepresented themselves, but they felt I was someone they could lure into their traitorous plans! I just really can't believe this... [/quote] Well then.
  10. [quote name='Il Impero Romano' date='31 January 2010 - 09:04 PM' timestamp='1264989877' post='2149062'] Yes, the general forum topic. However, in your OP you apologized to "FARK, Athens, MHA, NPO, The Corporation, Ragnarok", indicating that there were reports on them as well. From the screen shot you provided of the forum, clearly there are a number of reports there which you could have screenshoted. You may say that nothing was photoshoped in the screenshot from your OP, but people who are familiar with the art are inclined to think that it very well may have been to include RandomlyJim's name. If you have more evidence of spying (and it stands to reason you wouldn't just take 2 screenshots and call it a day if you were planning on doing something like this), now would probably be the best time to post it. [/quote] I think he was apologizing to them because he told them that FAN didn't spy. Still considering his second screenshot and the fact that he said he'd have more I'm still very doubtful about it all. For something like this you'd think you would get it all organized before making a call out topic.
  11. [quote name='WCaesarD' date='31 January 2010 - 08:57 PM' timestamp='1264989436' post='2149035'] I can promise you that nothing was shopped, and I provided further evidence a couple pages back. working on getting a clean version of the first pic back up. [/quote] Didn't have a clean version to begin with, eh?
  12. [quote name='Sargun' date='31 January 2010 - 08:39 PM' timestamp='1264988361' post='2148909'] Conflicting messages? [/quote] The first one might be referring to the fact that he photoshopped this after he was promoted.
  13. [quote name='WCaesarD' date='31 January 2010 - 08:33 PM' timestamp='1264988033' post='2148867'] Still sorting everything out. I can edit the OP, if it'll make you feel better. [/quote] It'll support your claim better surely.
  14. You mentioned screenshots, why did you post only one?
  15. [quote name='Aeternos Astramora' date='31 January 2010 - 06:25 PM' timestamp='1264980336' post='2148586'] Um, k. However, there is no doubt that bandwagoners are some of the most looked down people on Planet Bob. [/quote] So they should have attacked an alliance not at war?
  16. [quote name='Elyat' date='29 January 2010 - 08:24 PM' timestamp='1264814699' post='2142924'] And to think you guys told FAN to "come out and fight". [/quote] Great post, keep it up.
  17. Why didn't echelon approach the people they surrendered to regarding having the term removed?
  18. And kudos to TOP for having the ability to do that to an alliance.
×
×
  • Create New...