Jump to content

Affluenza

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    389

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Blog Comments posted by Affluenza

  2. AirMe

    Posted

    I am still not happy with the initial declaration or how many MK members seem to be painting this as an endgame scenario for them. However, the opposition, once again has deploy in a manner to avoid taking damage. I suppose that is strategically sound, but it is cowardly.

    Cowardly?

    The game has become utterly ridiculous because of us the players p-laying cowardly...

    Alliances need to fabricate BS cb's to get the masses to swallow it before a war can even be started and you don't think that's cowardly?

    This is a game at the end of the day and it should be treated like one...

    The game needs a shift in the way it is played...I'm not saying this move we made is the shift but I hope in future alliances will actually "consider" (key word) pre-emptive strikes as a tool for engaging one another...

  3. Schattenmann

    Posted

    This has been an invalid argument for 2 years. The point of a Viceroy is governance, governance cannot be achieved without complete access, complete access cannot be assured without administrative access. Without demands on RL property (forums) a Viceroy is incapable of performing its purpose.

    Yes but you can still have viceroys...

    I'm sure if you think about it you can come up with alternatives...because there are always alternatives. ;)

  7. Ragashingo

    Posted

    There have been *numerous* posts to the effect of saying that popular sentiment within Mushroom Kingdom was in support of Grub's move. All up until the "Not appropriate vs. wrong" debacle.

    So...Yes, really.

    MK and others tried very hard to stop the war from even happening...and there was never any support for this war. If there was we would have had a poll on supporting NpO as such we haven't...because internally we do not agree with the war.

×
×
  • Create New...