Laslo Kenez

Did people really get bent out of shape about being mimicked? Are we all 8 years old?

[quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1340173825' post='2989847'] Everyone is still laughing that C&G let GATO in. Be sure to last more than a round or two, please. [/quote] Righto, will make sure I remind you of this post in about two weeks then.

[quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1340171029' post='2989824'] Bring all of MK out of peace mode now. You will get a fight. Until then shut the $%&@ up. You're not giving us enough targets. [/quote] Remember when everyone laughed at SF for letting you in? This is why.

[quote name='Emperor Whimsical' timestamp='1340103108' post='2988750'] I am frankly, in contrast to Roq, dumbfounded how brazenly you and your membership have violated your own treaties. You[b] should[/b] be ashamed. You (and your membership, who voted on the war itself) have sold one of your oldest allies, to your greatest foe down the river to save your own skins. Embrace your role as a cowardly lackey, because no one will ever let you forget it. Especially for being allied to alliances like NEW and TPF, who have jumped into the fire for their allies without a second thought. Pathetic. [/quote] Square with me the whole VE thing again, then, in the context of what you just posted?

[quote name='The Pansy' timestamp='1340095337' post='2988704'] GATO has 108 Members in PM Sparta has 77 Members in PM You are both alliances with the same size member base Basically quit the PM crap, it makes you look stupid. [/quote] All PM mode commentary is the absolute worst.

[quote name='EgoFreaky' timestamp='1340094834' post='2988700'] More serious, a while back we had a Q&A with GATO and in that Q&A i told them GATO was one of the alliances I would love to fight 1 on 1, not because I have a grudge against them but because we have a similar tier distribution (granted it shifted to GATO's favor since last war) and some other similarities. MK we never pretended to like, and TLR seems to be in here for the chain, so honestly not to much we should complain about. [/quote] It should be fun, plus we get on pretty well every time we do a Q&A. I predict we'll have a friendly enough war, regardless of all that is said of what surrounds it.

[quote name='Charles Stuart' timestamp='1340087808' post='2988651'] I believe omni's nation not being nuked over some spying allegations is all the enlightenment I need to provide. [/quote] Well this is dishonest, Charles; we investigated the matter and found nothing to actually support his trolling, and out of respect for our TIO friends decided to be diplomatic about it. I think I even spoke to you to a similar end?

[quote name='Buds The Man' timestamp='1340081814' post='2988573'] http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=111479&view=findpost&p=2982967 LIke i said i get it but why support then not do anything. [/quote] I can't speak for Int (despite what some have been saying) but I suspect they're like many; hoping LSF win, but constrained by the fact they went and clearly picked this fight.

[quote name='Buds The Man' timestamp='1340078194' post='2988462'] Ok now same logic if it was INT that did those stupid things would you roll? Dont get me wrong this is EXACTLY why we put asshat clauses in. But we dont talk !@#$ and back an alliance right up until war is declared then go hey isnt that something shiney over there. [/quote] It's a MADP bloc. LSF was a MDoAP treaty.

[quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1340078842' post='2988488'] Woah you're not going to post the obsessed video this time? That was a better comeback than this. [/quote] I thought about making one of those wordle things with your posts, but then I thought would that make me obsessed? This is a dangerous game.

Strictly business, nothing personal R&R!

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1340040531' post='2987785'] I was starting to think all you C&G folks were serious when you say I'm irrelevant. [/quote] I was being serious [quote name='Lurunin' timestamp='1340040448' post='2987783'] Ah MDoAP my apologies was going off something one hooligan member had told me back then Also second part is complete bull considering Xanth came to my channel Wat,, month back and admitted the only reason he agreed to that peace agreement was so he could troll later on when he got confirmed help from INT. He specifically said he called in backup at that time to delay peace negotiations and to inflict extra last minute damage. [/quote] I think that might have just been said to upset you, sorry to say [quote] Also lol If you think i didn't know about said alternative plans. Believe me i was trying to think how best to handle the situation when my members were loving the war and were refusing the notion of peace at the time. Also i still. To this day say that I will never be able to fully repay neat back for what they did for us and I'll always remember that, they prevented a 2v1 In hooligans favor to turning into a 13v1 : NEAT Finally I have to say that when you make a post at a certain alliance you would hope that its one of their members responding to you, not an ally...THAT is why i considered it damage control [/quote] Yeah, they did a good job for you, we were ready and quite happy to come in. I reply to that stuff because we were with Int no matter what they decided to do It's less damage control as just feeling quite involved myself.

[quote name='Biff Webster' timestamp='1340035288' post='2987719'] "Schattenmann is irrelevant"/"We made plan[u][b]s[/b][/u] about him" [/quote] Superb reading comprehension and research there, considering we were talking about PPO and Hooligans having difficulties agreeing peace at the end of the MHA front last war.

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1340034268' post='2987697'] Go on, Laslo, Doom House Caretaker of the GATO Assembly. If all you have to say for your miserable ally and your miserable, hogtied bloc is "Schattenmann, hurrdurr" you confirm my words more each time that it is all you have to say. You go gossip about me in the parlour with the ladies while the rest of us talk politics in the study. [/quote] What a classy bit of misogyny there, you're so feisty when you get upset.

[quote name='Lurunin' timestamp='1340033868' post='2987691'] Seriously? You backed an odp ally last war who purposely withheld peace and stalled negotiations so that they can bring you guys in to be used to simply add extra damage at last minute (well ghosted a few nations in the end atleast). but yet when another MDoAP ally gets attacked after baiting for a war you fully supported you are touting all these reasons as to why you don't need to defend them anymore.... [/quote] A) they were an MDoAP ally, who declared to defend their CnG allies. b) They made that offer before they really understood the process or the circumstances c) Considering the alternative plans, you got lucky with just a few nations ghosting to hit you. Go home. Almost everyone other than those with a stake otherwise reckons that there is a massive element of aggression to what LSF did. We were happy to support The International either way, but whatever.

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1340033615' post='2987686'] not one of us out here looking in is impressed. [/quote] I can safely say that nobody has thought "I wonder what Schattenmann will have to say about all this?", so don't trouble yourself too much

[quote name='Raken' timestamp='1340027425' post='2987612'] threw a temper tantrum when we didn't activate our treaty after you countered for FARK's pre-empt. [/quote] We had pretty much the same experience, which suggests Sparta deluded themselves into thinking that it was a completely reasonable move to make. Great job guys!

Look at the bitter baby in the OP. Look at how bitter he is. Recommendation for Valhalla though, while we're providing snide "assistance" to others; stop your terrible 100% definitely unofficial Valhalla opinion posters from starting their call-out threads with "we at Valhalla". It can create the (obviously, definitely, completely mistaken) perception that this is what you actually believe! And nobody wants that.

[quote name='Melancholy Culkin' timestamp='1340026111' post='2987587'] Oh wow pack it up Umbrella, you just lost right here. [/quote] lol [quote name='DeathAdder' timestamp='1340021006' post='2987554'] Considering your twitter got "Hacked" because you guys were too incompetent to change the pass, I wouldn't throw stones too hard. [/quote] If forgetting to change a Twitter password is the best example of incompetence you've got, it's probably best to try a different route.

[quote name='Captain Flinders' timestamp='1339968042' post='2986627'] So what you're saying is that your allegations exist based off the evidence you've concocted in your head right? Kindly keep them there. [/quote] Yes, "concocted in my head", in the sense that any analysis beyond the thinly veiled statements put out regarding your imagary and theme nearly always comes to the same conclusion. Otherwise, this is all a tautology; you are not representing something deeply questionable because that was yesterday, and yesterday is nothing like today because you say so.

A lotta respect for BFF, keep on trucking.

[quote name='Finnish Commie' timestamp='1340011821' post='2987507'] Both sides play the same game and both sides will keep denying the game exists. [/quote] The game's out there... play or get played.

This is going to end in wreckage for you, but I applaud you for actually turning up and honouring your treaties, without a terrible OP.

[quote name='Captain Flinders' timestamp='1339818724' post='2985538'] In character we are whatever we claim to be. That's the point of a character, we set the theme and outline. We are a Germanic or even pan-European militaristic alliance. Obviously borrowing some symbolism from that general idea, though certainly not exclusively from world war 2. Any other inference as to our morals or beliefs based on your interpretation is just that, your interpretation. And in this case your (among others') interpretation is misguided and incorrect. [/quote] You can be whatever you claim to be, but everyone else can always read past authorial intent into the sub-text of your work, and, well...

[quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1339786797' post='2985080'] Then obligatory GATO sucks. [/quote] It's a happy coincidence