Jump to content

Imperator Hades

Members
  • Posts

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Imperator Hades

  1. There is only one candidate. PC. ^^^ proof for the generations who missed the ego of PC
  2. [quote name='Working_Class_Ruler' date='10 March 2010 - 09:28 PM' timestamp='1268215408' post='2220808'] Aww MHA, Umbrella, FOK, Sparta, Gre and NSO (?) need to make a bloc - look at us all just floating in the middle there without any pretty circles around us. We could be called the Pound Puppies, or the Raggy Dolls. [/quote] I have heard there is a potential new bloc in the process of being created.
  3. [quote]Dont make me sick. Suck up to people for protection? How could anyone do that and not feel utterly pathetic. [/quote] Well considering that after GWIII, around half of the alliances did it, then im guessing the pathetic option is easier than the honorable option.
  4. I will have to disagree with the OP, respectfully of course. Blocs, MDP groups or whatever you want to call them come and go. The very fact that we have "two poles" in the current CN political world is proof of that. If you remember post GWIII there was one "pole" and that was WuT. We couldnt even call the enemies of WuT a "pole" as they were too unorganised and beat down to resist WuT. These modern "poles" are for the most part made up of alliances who were still pretty small players in the political game back then. Heck..GGA for all intents and purposes chased Sparta out of Green!!. I will have to agree with Elyat this is uncharted territory simply due to the fact that there is no dominant power like NPO was between GWII and UJW. As for this, [quote]If you think SF and CnG are going to go to war with each other in the next big one, you should talk to CnG and SF members and leaders. They adore each other a lot, and have a quite a bit of unity. I don't think sitting around and just hoping for SF and CnG to fight each other is a good plan. Wishful thinking makes for bad prophecy[/quote] Im not advocating there will be a war, far from it, but I will say that Pacifica and Polaris said the same thing before. Sh*t happens and friendships change, infact if we have learned anything in the last 4 years its that Murphy's law dominates CN.
  5. Whats interesting is nearly all of the individuals mentioned are from 06/07. Stop hogging all the glory you old fogies and let the youngsters rise up in CN
  6. [quote][u]Many alliances[/u] and government positions later[/quote] You got that right
  7. [quote name='TheNeverender' date='10 March 2010 - 02:00 PM' timestamp='1268188552' post='2220307'] I've still got a few months! Haha, fogies! [/quote] Likewise....I need to find a new game
  8. In theory I think it could work, in practice i think it would just give us more wars. Which isnt too bad so I support it
  9. [quote name='alyster' date='07 March 2010 - 04:56 AM' timestamp='1267896680' post='2216060'] Demagogy is quite lame, Olaf. [/quote] Olaf is a demagogue after populist support? Evidence please? EDIT: Also, hi alyster, missed me much?
  10. EDIT: nevermind...missed the colour option. Sorry
  11. Nation Name: Imperial Furya Nation Ruler: Imperator Hades Resource 1: Lumber Resource 2: Oil Im switching to white, il be fine with any trade set
  12. next fad for prius drivers...smurf...
  13. lol..i had a convo with you before and you said you were a north melbourner, lying will get you in trouble..tch tch tch....I used to live out on the mornington peninsula. So I am now immune to the effects of rain.
  14. [quote]1. Led? or participated in? Sparta follows. I have yet to see them lead. We're talking about contemporary Sparta of course. What happened 3 or more years ago is irrelevant to today.[/quote] I thought no one led a bloc anyway ?
  15. [quote]That kind of lazy thinking is how we ended up with a hegemony for 2 years in the first place. People need to own up to their own actions, and grow enough back bone to tell their treaty partners when they have their head up their $@!, or decide to drop said treaty partner.[/quote] VE speaks from experience. After all, NPO did smash them for such actions..Oh wait...bad example.
  16. [quote name='Nintenderek' date='26 February 2010 - 02:40 AM' timestamp='1267110825' post='2203040'] I think we all know what happened last time there was a coup in GGA. Hopefully, this ends better for GGA than Bilrow's version of this. [/quote] It wasnt that bad..we did get one great final topic from he who shall remain nameless
  17. [quote name='Hymenbreach' date='25 February 2010 - 10:04 PM' timestamp='1267094284' post='2202891'] Anyone who has been trawling the Peanut Gallery knows that Ivan has been entering alleged 'White Peace' threads going 'Nah huh' a lot. I just get the feeling that this wasn't a serious peace offer. You don't seriously expect a serious minded, stiffnecked character like Ivan Moldavi to bend over and perform a lulz surrender term with a smile on his face? Ivan was right to see it wasn't a serious offer of peace and wait for someone who isn't giggling behind his hands to offer something more dignified before accepting surrender. I think that clears matters up. [/quote] It might be because Ivan is a "serious minded, stiffnecked character" that such terms were offered. For lack of a better phrase, "the lolz" coming from Ivan agreeing to such terms considering Ivan's prestegious past would have brought a smile to more than a few faces.
  18. I love it, do a spy attack and avoid getting caught. Then post it for all to see. Excellent.
×
×
  • Create New...