The false premise being that there was any higher level of discourse to begin with.
--
It's an important distinction, for even GPA (or its members, more accurately --) does not take a neutral stance on world events from time to time.
Additionally, merely being neutral in a given conflict or event does not indemnify the rest of the world against potential acts of harm from said entity.
I have a hard time levying sympathy for folks who by definition offer no support to others in affairs and also in part do not necessarily forsake the use of arms against others.
All credibility over a debate of sorts over just and warranted attacks go out the window when said alliances never offer it in return for others.