Varianz

[quote name='Mesteut' timestamp='1323643978' post='2874328'] As an alliance that knowingly burnt in the GATO - One Vision war, you can be rest assured that if we stay out of a fight, it is for good reason and not for cowardice. [/quote] Drawing on your actions 3 1/2 years ago is not a good way to make a point about your actions today. There are only ~15 members of CSN left from that period by my count.

I'm lol'ing at CSN whining about being outnumbered. Welcome to what you've done for the last few years. !@#$@#$ enjoy it.

Roll them TPF. Roll them hard.

Have fun guys.

This is incredibly dumb for so many reasons.

Christmas came early!

Welp. Say goodbye to your upper tier Sparta.

[quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1323484096' post='2871561'] Coming from the alliance that attacked MHA out of fear. [/quote] This is not [i]nearly [/i]as effective a comeback as it sounded in your head.

[quote name='Hyperonic' timestamp='1323473185' post='2871316'] id really love to see you prove that you speak for the community [/quote] Here you go: [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1323469715' post='2871255'] Is this a real post? [/quote] [quote name='Garion' timestamp='1323472147' post='2871285'] EDIT: Hyperonic, are you serious? xD [/quote] [quote name='JonathanB' timestamp='1323472312' post='2871291'] are you seriously saying you buy 50 cms, pay the extra upkeep, and have some destroyed in attacks just so you dont have to buy more later? [/quote] [quote name='Redneck' timestamp='1323472649' post='2871298'] what exactly are you on? [/quote] [quote name='Chief Savage Man' timestamp='1323472758' post='2871301'] are you real [/quote]

[quote name='Hyperonic' timestamp='1323472845' post='2871308'] I dont understand your question OOC: i would never do drugs if that is what you are implying [/quote] We, collectively as a community, are wondering where your !@#$% crazy ideas and posts are coming from.

[quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1323471559' post='2871273'] So far a massive number of 0 PoWs have been recorded. [/quote] [url="http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=New+Sith+Order&input1=Commonwealth+of+Sovereign+Nations"]Really? Because I found 100.[/url] [quote name='Hyperonic' timestamp='1323471965' post='2871280'] listen im only going to say this one time to you okay if you buy 50 cruise missiles now than it probably does and then you wont have to buy them later [/quote] 1. You are wrong. 2. You should stop posting you make your alliance look even worse (if that's possible).

[quote name='Hyperonic' timestamp='1323471768' post='2871276'] Oh god did i just use that line on an actually black man because i meant to say he's one of those mushroom guys and he might not understand that 50 curise missiles is agood way to save money because you dont have to buy them l8r [/quote] Hoooooooooooooly !@#$ haha you're serious aren't you?

[quote name='Seipher Caim' timestamp='1323351034' post='2869112'] Following [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=107090&view=findpost&p=2869016"]THIS Score Chart[/url], I add this "cumulative Score % loss" map... [img]http://i355.photobucket.com/albums/r471/SeipherCaim/grudge4loss.jpg[/img] I used [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=11169&view=findpost&p=2868177"]Gopher Numbers[/url], Which are as follow for the first 15 alliances : STA 32,2 Menotah 23,6 Polaris 16,1 RIA 15,5 USN 15,3 FAN 14,5 ARES 14,3 FARK 14 VOC 12,9 TORN 11,6 IRON 11 NebX 10,6 Valhalla 10,5 UPN 9,9 Avalanche 8,3 Note : 1) I removed OP, URON and TR. 2) Alliances that gained Score are reprensented as 0% loss... [/quote] This is pretty freaking awesome. So is the other chart you have, but this is even cooler. Props.

[quote name='Robster83' timestamp='1323415209' post='2870627'] Why the ambiguity? Be specific. You wanted us to surrender. We told you that isn't happening. [/quote] What else would you expect haha? You're [i]losing[/i].

[quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1323414583' post='2870608'] umm no you weren't. As a friend up above said though you obviously don't understand what "treaty chaining" and "non-chaining clauses" mean. So, I'm not going to waste my time playing teacher. [/quote] But Omni in case you hadn't heard RIA fought on [i]both sides of a war[/i]!!!!11!

[quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1323413379' post='2870574'] Ooh e-lawyering, that's effective. [/quote] Who would you like to hear from STA gov, TPF gov, or a combination thereof? Because they'll both tell you they've had a long understanding about their respective positions when TOP (finally) rolled Polar.

[quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1323409869' post='2870491'] STA was also attacked, and before NPO was :v [/quote] Do we have to create a special wiki page to explain what a non-chaining clause is just for you? Because you've needed this drawn out for you something like 6 times already this war.

[quote name='Seerow' timestamp='1323409229' post='2870463'] I have no idea. I don't even know the guy's name. Hopefully someone closer to it posts here to clarify. [/quote] The joke is that ARES dMoW surrendered on the first day too.

[quote name='Vukland' timestamp='1323375851' post='2869512'] I tried to figure out the treaty web and half the people fighting have treaties on both sides. And people wonder why we stay out of politics. [/quote] Only half?

Who are you a reroll of?

[quote name='NationRuler' timestamp='1323226932' post='2866627'] Add NSO to the growing list of fake DoWs. Your time will come. [/quote] Did you miss the part in the topic description where he said it wasn't a DoW?

It's been a fun few days lol

[quote name='Princess Doomee' timestamp='1323183861' post='2865705'] We must give TPF credit for consistency here if nothing else. Once again they waited until the odds were totally stacked in their favor before risking the pixels. Kudos. [/quote] Accusing TPF of cowardice is one of the dumbest things you could do.

[quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1323198688' post='2865897'] Tbf, I don't think anyone could install a viceroy anymore even if they wanted to. [/quote] I mean, it depends entirely on the alliance surrendering. I agree that 90% of alliances in CN would disband rather than take a viceroy, but there are always some.

[quote name='Vulpes Inculta' timestamp='1323198318' post='2865892'] From what I understand, viceroyship (that is, the forced control of another alliance by a chosen member of another alliance) was deemed illegal in 2008. I could be wrong, so I'd appreciate it if someone from back then could clarify. [/quote] It is illegal to force an alliance to give someone control (admin powers) over their alliance forums. However, viceroyship is legal as long as it stays in the purview of [OCC] the game [OCC]. That said, RoK have no intention of actually imposing a viceroy lol.