-
Posts
485 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About President Gunn
- Birthday June 23
Contact Methods
-
Skype
Nascar8FanGA
Profile Information
-
Location
Over There
-
Gender
Male
Previous Fields
-
Sanctioned Alliance
The Legion
-
Nation Name
Acturea
-
Alliance Name
Invicta
-
Resource 1
Lumber
-
Resource 2
Water
-
CN:TE Nation Name
Snow Land
-
CN:TE Alliance Name
Roman Empire
Recent Profile Visitors
874 profile views
President Gunn's Achievements
Newbie (1/14)
-
I'm still trying to figure out when Invicta stopped being a "!@#$ alliance" and started being an alliance who could form coalitions and challenge not only NPO, but Oculus. Any help on this?
- 101 replies
-
- cowboys are neutral
- invicta
- (and 13 more)
-
Post of the year This is awesome, I laughed pretty hard Pretty much
- 101 replies
-
- cowboys are neutral
- invicta
- (and 13 more)
-
Imperial Decree from the New Pacific Order
President Gunn replied to Lord of Darkness's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
When did Invicta become such a good, influential alliance to where we could build coalitions again? -
Royal Declaration from Sparta
President Gunn replied to Cazaric's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
You two are meant for each other -
Imperial Decree from the New Pacific Order
President Gunn replied to Lord of Darkness's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Polar came to the light with a treaty, Invicta did not -
Imperial Decree from the New Pacific Order
President Gunn replied to Lord of Darkness's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
I laughed way too hard at this 5/5 -
Sorry when I meant any other time of the treaty, I was referring to the ODoAP, and the entire time from when I originally joined Invicta and was MoIA in 2009 to it was cancelled in 2012 I think it was.
-
Imperial Decree - Red Sphere
President Gunn replied to Frawley's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
The only smart move o/ -
It was downgraded before the break down, it was cancelled after the breakdown. The official reason given to me (I was the leader at the time) was the ole "Communication" line. However, our communication had been higher in the previous 3-6 months than it had been during any other time of the treaty. We had multiple government (Including you Haflinger I think and myself) over at their forums and I talked to JudgeX every time I saw he was online. Invicta gov was specifically told what Thrash is accusing by a former TPF gov member after he left TPF and joined Invicta a few months to a year later.
-
War leaked; attack off
-
Please don't encourage this
-
I have to say that I'm quite confused lol
-
Congratulations to the followers of the Dumb Bird
President Gunn replied to zoskia's topic in Open World RP
Since Kashmir has been parading around discussing how "Invicta wasted no time promising in private that this would be a four month long engagement" I thought I would discuss this a little since I am the one promising it would be 4 months long. Sir William didn't want to log dump me because it would make him look like an idiot. Below are the logs where we "promised that this would be a 4 month long engagement." Session Start: Mon Nov 24 00:44:51 2014 Session Ident: SirWilliam 01[00:44:52] <12Nascar8FanGA> Hi [00:45:16] <SirWilliam> hello 01[00:45:33] <12Nascar8FanGA> Just wanting to wish Kashmir luck in our little war :) [00:46:16] <SirWilliam> i'm guessing more like our skirmish :v 01[00:46:27] <12Nascar8FanGA> that'd be a better way to describe it atm 01[00:46:28] <12Nascar8FanGA> lol 01[00:46:55] <12Nascar8FanGA> But I'm sure we'll trade plenty of nukes in the next like 4 months [00:48:00] <SirWilliam> heh, i guess after SUN finishes rolling over we will be 01[00:48:32] <12Nascar8FanGA> Once I get nuked down a little lower I'll make sure to get a few wars with you guys Session Close: Mon Nov 24 01:14:06 2014 If you notice I said "like 4 months" which could be anywhere from 3-5. But I mean lets be honest. It's not like Invicta has been in one or two, four month long wars in the past several years to base this off handed comment while telling Kashmir good luck.