Jump to content

The AUT

Banned
  • Posts

    2,114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The AUT

  1. [quote name='D34th' date='07 May 2010 - 04:37 AM' timestamp='1273203438' post='2289762'] NpO would love to be part of UJP 2.0, sign us in please. [/quote] Your showing last war made that abundantly clear. Anyways I'm not down but you guys have fun.
  2. The AUT

    Aut Callout

    Only to a TE duel? A duel that has 0 consequence and was not what we agreed to? An idea brought up on the spur of the moment by Wabooz that you hopped on in #nso since it meant you got off easy for all the trash you talked? Wow, you're so full of it it's incredible. You want TE, I said okay.. but you also promised SE. I don't care about TE, you don't either. I want it to be in SE. I even gave you the luxury to take your time to build up in SE and prepare to fight me. TE is meaningless, no nukes and cruise missiles and bombing raids for 2 infra a pop. That's boring and worthless. You take "welcome to the consequences" and make it seem like, "welcome to the consequences, er I'll find a way to come up with a cheaper and cost effective alternative!" How about you get into your CSN "super duper" growth program and level up then come find me. You want to do TE as well, sure why not. But I'm giving you an ample amount of time in SE to get ready as well.
  3. The AUT

    Important

    Well mindless comments aren't exactly "criticisms" Criticism is an art, my friend. It's not meant to hurt anyone.
  4. The AUT

    Aut Callout

    I said we can fight in TE, but we'd also have to fight in SE. I don't care what CSN said. You coming in yelling and crying to try and prove yourself. You want to play in a form of the game with no consequence and no bearing whatsoever on the game that really matters just because "CSN said so" You're not ready to back up your talk. You're just ready to make excuses every which way to avoid what we agreed to in favor of a cheap alternative. You want to do TE? Fine by me, but let's do SE like you promised. But wait.. you're too scared to keep your word.
  5. That nomination is more messed up than one of your tech deals.
  6. The AUT

    Aut Callout

    No, I said if you met me in SE I'd take up your offer in TE. It's called meeting halfway.
  7. The AUT

    Aut Callout

    There are no restrictions in TE. If anyone want to jump in, they could. It's a free for all, it's not like you can set up a battle grounds amidst the chaos within the game. Most of all, when I fight I want everyone to see it on SE. I told you to take your sweet old time catching up to me and you even said you'd be in my range via CSN's super duper programs. Now you want to take the easy road, do it in a game without consequence. In a game none of us even care about. That's now what I wanted, and that's not what you agreed to. If you want to fight in TE, I will set up a nation. You just meet me on SE too, like you promised. Wabooz brings up the idea and you run towards it with open arms because you know nothing matters there and you'll get a reprieve no matter what happens.
  8. The AUT

    Aut Callout

    No, no no no you fight me on CE when you're ready like you promised me. I don't do TE, it's arbitrary and we can't bring it up in CE whenever I so choose. Nice try, kid.
  9. My dislike for Polaris honestly. Not a shot at GOONS, though.

  10. [quote name='Penlugue Solaris' date='06 May 2010 - 01:07 AM' timestamp='1273104414' post='2288256'] And you know so much about my history with RDD don't you? All I can do is laugh at TFD/NADC, so I'll continue to do so. Kudos sir. [/quote] I understand, one world or none etc. You seemed angry when Polaris declared on \m/ and countless other times. It seems the more someone is against you, the more you dislike them. Which is okay, it goes with the flow of everything. But I must say, u mad Congratulations and good luck to RDD and NADC.
  11. Good luck with your newest idea, admin. Just an update, this is only for sanctioned alliances: Fark - 2 Green Protection Agency - 4 Mostly Harmless Alliance - 4 Mushroom Kingdom - 25 (Too bad there's not a dislike button ) New Pacific Order - 27 New Polar Order - 26 Orange Defense Network - 7 Sparta - 25 The Democratic Order - 3 The Order of the Paradox - 0 United Purple Nations - 4 Viridian Entente - 5 Also, anyone else not have a facebook?
  12. [quote name='Katsumi' date='05 May 2010 - 02:33 AM' timestamp='1273023208' post='2287088'] 12, eh... Hmmmm... Alright... Prodigal Chieftain, for being Our Lord and Saviour Electron Sponge, for diplomacy. He seems like the cool-headed type who always respects his allies. Kang Seung Jae, for recruitment. Yeah, there's nothing funny about all these similar nations created on the same day. Count da Silva, for propaganda. The AUT for that, too. Cager, because every alliance needs someone like that Rozalia, for the pink team mpol, for gun pr0n The Pansy, because what will we do with all these sheep otherwise? Rebel Virginia, because he's pretty much the Chuck Norris of CN Doitzel, for Military command. He destroyed 2 MCXA nations with his bear hands and doesn't afraid of anything, including fighting from DEFCON 4. Bob Sanders for Minister of English Yeah. That would be pretty sweet. [/quote] I do miss Junka. Also if I can be with mpol and Pansy I'd be happy.
  13. [quote name='AirMe' date='04 May 2010 - 08:16 PM' timestamp='1273000576' post='2286597'] That is quite a leap from what he actually said. Instead of making false insinuations why don't you actually read the comment and realize that is not what he is saying. Disbanding an alliance isn't a measure if you won or not. That is what he is saying. [/quote] I understand, but it's being used under the impression that it was an option or an alternative that could have been taken. Pacifica would've still been alive had the forces against them made the decision to keep them under perpetual warfare if they so chose. Disbandment couldn't have happened even if the other side wanted it too, and I've a feeling there were some who did.
  14. [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='04 May 2010 - 07:32 PM' timestamp='1272997935' post='2286555'] Think about what you're saying here for a second. You think because we didn't make them disband, we didn't win? [/quote] You guys are honestly under the impression you could have made them disband? Lord Brendan you're smarter than that, quit falling into the Penakala school of thought here.
  15. [quote name='Olaf Styke' date='04 May 2010 - 04:26 PM' timestamp='1272986785' post='2286407'] Well I think we can conclude this thread with a short summary: ODN = Win Sparta = Win ODN + Sparta = Win RV, Damsky, Halfinger, and the rest of OpFor = Fail Olaf = /thread [/quote] Are you really the king of Sparta? If so you fit the mold quite nicely I must say.
  16. Polaris fought on your guys side halfway through the war. Maybe not for you but still on the side they fought against to end tech raiding. So by proxy, they did help your side achieve victory and supported tech raiding.

    Be happy, you guys won!

  17. [quote name='King Penchuk' date='04 May 2010 - 04:23 PM' timestamp='1272986615' post='2286405'] Yes, but you are also a traitorous clown. [/quote] [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAMmUhHeT1I"]Yes, I know how you feel about clowns.[/url] I also know you're a two-faced "friend" but I understand you take after your alliance. I guess we can agree not to trust each other. As for me, Pacifica is far more trustworthy than Polaris. Easily.
  18. [quote name='Ashoka the Great' date='04 May 2010 - 04:03 PM' timestamp='1272985377' post='2286389'] We really need to start an "NPO ex-PZI/EZI Club". Hmmm....perhaps with a less-unwieldy name. Ignoring for a moment the fact that it would bring together some of the best people on Planet Bob, I kinda miss talking to some of you. *sniff* [/quote] I was on it, let's not do what they did. [quote]I will never trust the NPO. Nor should anyone else. [/quote] I said the same thing of Polaris.
  19. All I get at airports are pat downs
  20. [quote name='pezstar' date='04 May 2010 - 05:33 AM' timestamp='1272947588' post='2286075'] Our opinion of MK didn't change. They didn't do anything wrong here. They did pretty much what we would have in this situation, and in our post war treaty discussion amongst our alliance, it was pretty much unanimous that the treaty remain. It's still a solid friendship. Our opinion of NSO raised quite a bit higher. We were already friends... we remained so after Frostbite. Contrary to the peanut gallery's gossip, the Frostbite breakup was very, very amicable, and there really were no hard feelings. We ended it because we both recognized that we were moving in different directions, with different goals, and that was that. During the war, NSO got their first real chance to "put their money where their mouth is" on a global scale. They didn't disappoint. We are closer now than ever. There still isn't going to be a treaty. We don't need one. We know where we stand with each other, and that's good enough for both of us. NpO took a hit in the STA court of opinion. We're still friends, and there's no chance of anything happening to that treaty anytime soon, but there is work to be done on repairing that relationship. We were angry and hurt enough to more or less leave it alone and let ourselves cool off over the last month, but we're better about it now and we look forward to moving forward with them. None is diverted. We have a fund that is always in place. [/quote] Thanks for the honest answer. So my next question would be if your opinion of NSO grew and your opinion of NpO decreased, why do you still hold that treaty with NpO and not with NSO?
  21. Along with Kzop's question, how do you feel about MK/NpO/NSO after the war? Did your feelings change or were they unchanged?
  22. Welcome The New Guy, we love our baby brothers!
  23. [quote name='Penkala' date='03 May 2010 - 11:21 PM' timestamp='1272925254' post='2285398'] If we were afraid we would just kill NPO off. Right here, right now. You seem to forget we have the ability to do that, Aut. Just because we refrain (unlike NPO), we do have the ability to just keep NPO eternally in peace mode. And I'm sure if we were so 'scared' of them we would. Kind of related, here's my personal opinion on NPO coming out of terms: I would really advise against NPO trying to pick up where they left off. They know they were shown mercy during this last war (they fully expected to be kept in eternal war if they lost). We're giving them a second chance. They're free to act as they wish, but if they go "over the line", when things are turned around again (and they inevitably will be) I wouldn't be surprised if they get what they expect. What NPO has done in the past is simply unacceptable. It will no longer be tolerated in this cyberverse. This is your one chance, NPO. Don't squander it. You might not get another. [/quote] I haven't seen you this scared since I called you out and you ran behind CSN. You think what's happening to NPO right now is acceptable? Fyi buddy, injustice breeds injustice and this won't be forgotten even if it may be forgiven.
  24. May this treaty last forever, [ooc] for I love strawberries. [/ooc]
  25. I could make a poll about how he should fight me but I'm sure the excuses and tears will flow forth from his eyes and mouth to try frantically to avoid the inevitable show down.
×
×
  • Create New...