Saladjoe
-
Posts
1,100 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Everything posted by Saladjoe
-
Maybe it's because you're about to counter Sparta? Or maybe I'm just crazy.
-
What a stunning 5 dec blitz.
-
This x100. Have fun Sparta, you guys are awesome allies. :D
-
Have fun out there guys.
-
Surprisingly solid blitz from NSO especially consider the inundation of coverage already present.
-
Needs more kibbles n bits.
-
Well played.
-
You are disconnected Rush.. From reality.
-
Sounds like its the perfect time for NoR to strike. :D
-
I feel like our mutual affinity for graphs and AoE is indicative of something.
-
Low hanging fruit my friend. :P
-
I for one will be extremely disappointed if we don't get at least 50K tech in reps from polar.
-
Better blitz than expected AI, kudos.
-
Go back to ODN you crazy pastry. Give em hell UPN.
-
I lol'd.
-
Disciples in a Sandstorm
Saladjoe replied to Das Blitzkrieger's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Enjoy yourself DoD. -
Enjoy yourselves Aftermath.
-
underrated post.
-
Sounds about right.
-
Congrats to the Pacificans and the Parasolians, two high quality alliances.
-
He made a quad post on our biards, he's in the zone today. :P
-
What he said. Graphs are superior for trend indications.
-
Hey, I wouldn't want to limit your options or anything Samus. :D
-
I do appreciate that you actually used numbers to counter my claim. Your stats would be more meaningful if 1. We had actually fought in a meaningful way in Karma, a war in which you guys did indeed fight hard. A 70% to 0% difference in net % skews the end results pretty hard. 2. The last war that you lost more net % was Dave, which was two and a half years ago now? Something like that. So again, I said I got my years wrong in my follow up post. 3. Proportionality vs Total numbers. Our alliances are built differently and we tend to end up losing target availability after the first month or so of a front (see Grudge) so our impact is more immediate than long felt. A long felt participation in a war by an alliance that actually possesses a middle and lower tier will have a greater statistical impact overall, regardless of the actual impact of damage dealt during the war. This is also in reference to your claims about growth. It's a lot easier to supply your upper tier nations when you have a large pool of tech farms at your disposal, but if anything that should be a credit to your macro growth since the war. As for how many 10K tech nations you have, we currently have 84 members to your 343. That's kind of given that you'll have more of something when you have over four times as many nations. :P As for berbers I'm not going to even justify your peace mode comments since you've repeatedly made these asinine comments.
-
You're right hart I overestimated my years. As a long term Paradoxians I tend to compare things in pre Bi/post Bi terms and that's a fault of mine. :P Either way, if you're going to accumulate stats it should be under the assumption that you actually use them. That's been our philosophy at least ;)
