Jump to content

Samwise

Members
  • Posts

    1,087
  • Joined

Everything posted by Samwise

  1. I think after two of TPC's made an alliance to win the award, admin made it where you had to have 10 members. 10 is the minimum requirement for the strongest alliance award currently.
  2. The only thing I heard of someone suggesting to change this award to stop what happened yesterday is: 1. Turn off the ability to create new nations say in the last week to a month before TE ends. As these are 100 day rounds, even a month doesn't sound too bad considering anybody who creates 30 days before TE ends is going to be a severe disadvantage due to lack of wonders. 2. Keep the ability of creating nations, but only count those who have more than a certain seniority. I believe an award used to be "Top 2 nations in the alliance with the highest avg. NS" so on the last day a couple big nations would make an alliance to snipe the award last minute. Setting a mandatory seniority that an alliance member must have before they contribute to alliance score would've stopped everything that happened yesterday on both sides. A different award I'd like to see in place of strongest alliance is a return of the alliance with the highest avg NS award as mentioned above. As I said previously, alliance score is so easily manipulated by member count, that the strongest alliance award almost always goes to the alliance with more members. The fact that the alliance that won last night, was the one who accepted nations that were 0 days old should prove that. Alliances base their war targets all round based on avg NS, so to me, it's the fairest and best way to show who had the best members, pound for pound. But as I stated above, include alliance seniority as a factor.
  3. Alliance score is largely affected by member count. So much so, that in efforts to achieve the "Top Two Nations By Strength In The Strongest Alliance" award, nations who have literally contributed nothing to gameplay other than score inflation were spawned into the game on the last days of the round for the previous 2 rounds now. In efforts to show admin that this award needs to be changed, several alliances have banded together and sent all their membership to the same alliance. With all the score manipulations that have taken place, this award has lost all meaning that admin originally intended, and I suggest it be removed.
  4. I instructed WD to stay away from those OPs.
  5. IRON Nations: 15 NS: 270,662.66 Avg NS: 18,044 Infra: 38,989.52 Tech: 5,345.81 Land: 8,882.19 Nukes: 26 DCS/NDO/OP/WD Nations: 24 NS: 327,279.18 Avg NS: 13,637 Infra: 57,759.85 Tech: 9,081.73 Land: 9,821.86 Nukes: 8 Total NS Damages this war: 381,956.26 IRON dealt 59% of those total damages Congrats all around guys. I had a blast, and I'm really glad to see that outside of an accidental declare, we all respected the no-war list. Thanks for the radiation and war commentary!
  6. Sorry @trs4ece The spirit was willing, but the body was not.
  7. Stats from this morning before the boom booms: IRON Nations: 15 NS: 446,793.99 Avg NS: 29,786.266 Infra: 68,209.35 Tech: 9,288.92 Land: 17,837.34 Nukes: 79 DCS/NDO/OP/WD Nations: 24 NS: 600,467.74 Avg NS: 25,019.49 Infra: 103,443.34 Tech: 13,728.29 Land: 21,767.5 Nukes: 61 I did account for the people who can't participate due to the hurricane or other RL issues, or non-built temp traders. Good luck all. o/
  8. War Doves can fill in where you're light on NS if y'all want. It's just myself, Beli and tenno heika. The other 2 are temps and won't sandbag your guys.
  9. If someone could switch with me and RP Daenarys while I RP the Night King or Euron Greyjoy, that'd be great.
  10. War Doves Declaration of Existence Our Gov: Cersei-Kurdanak of the House Lannister, the First of Her Name, Queen of the Andals and the First Men, Protector of the Seven Kingdoms Daenerys Samwise of the House Targaryen, the First of Her Name, rightful heir to the Iron Throne, rightful Queen of the Andals and the First Men, Protector of the Seven Kingdoms, the Mother of Dragons, the Khaleesi of the Great Grass Sea, the Unburnt, the Breaker of Chains Jon Belisarius Snow - He's King in the North Come and hang out with us! Forums: http://wardoves.net/forums/ | Discord: https://discord.gg/PtCebpV
  11. Yes, we actually did take a page out of your book with this war declaration. I can't tell. Is that irony?
  12. Yes! I might come knocking too. I'm not particularly bothered with who I end up warring this round. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I declare war on everyone \o/ I had plans at last night's changeover. But I'm here now.
  13. Hey all, In the past war we got to see all of the major alliances burn some pixels down. During that time, the 8 of us made a Discord channel to coordinate our attacks, and I certainly had fun meeting new people, and catching up with old friends. Instead of deleting the channel, I've decided to turn it into a TE channel - where everybody is welcome. Here's the link to those who are interested: https://discord.gg/w2fbaJX I hope to see you there!
  14. That was a great round for me. I had a blast and warred a ton. It was awesome Like I'd pass up an opportunity to post that link braggin' on my war stats for that round.
  15. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Fyi2S4nYZzgI1QBH8Du0NEFSlrPXy-jWXds4QUqdwTg/edit?usp=sharing D1 put up some yuge damage numbers this war, dealing almost 1/3 of the total damages all by themselves, and their members averaging 17k NS damage dealt per nation. DCS also did fantastic, coming in 2nd for avg. damage dealt per nation. Pound for pound, some impressive fighters over there as well.
  16. I don't even know what I'm looking at here. Whatever it is, I think I'm insulted because I was left off it. How very rude of you. Ooh la la. If you show me yours, I'll show you mine...
  17. I was once told, if you love something, set it free, and if it comes back to you, it's yours. Stop looking at me with those big effing cute saucer eyes of yours. ;_; I'm afraid I may disappoint you. Exhibit A:
  18. I don't mean any disrespect, but consider that while UN/D1 had some heavy hitters at the very top, we still very much have the numbers on our side, and have (had?) the ability to swarm them and with proper coordination, overwhelm them. All 3 of my targets are updeclares not because I'm brave or stupid, but because I found people who will coordinate their attacks with mine. Cherry picking targets lower than you without any rhyme or reason other than you can easily overwhelm them doesn't help anybody except you, and can hinder those actually trying to coordinate. But even so, in a statistically even fight, there will be discrepancies in NS between individual nations. It's just not possible for all the numbers to magically align, and allow for the same NS ranges every time - especially with navies largely inflating NS. And more often than not, you have someone drawing up target lists, so calling out all of D1 and UN when it's likely only a handful of guys were the ones in charge of target assignments, is a bit unfair to the general population of people just following orders. ^This was freaking hilarious. The struggle is real. lol
×
×
  • Create New...