Jump to content

SirWilliam

Members
  • Posts

    5,336
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SirWilliam

  1. Despite my best efforts I can't really decipher any of that so I'll just assume you've failed to refute my point and move on.
  2. To those in LSF (and elsewhere) who saw war and/or sanctions as a result of his actions. To the alliances affected by the sanctions he repeatedly removed. And to the numerous nations he sanctioned himself. Clearly, one can comfortably say he was toxic.
  3. Harry was toxic to the brown team so we're better off without him (especially as a senator). Congrats on peace between GATO/SLAP and LSF.
  4. Many of my fondest memories in this game were as part of MK and by extension C&G. Glad to see so many of you are still kicking around.
  5. Gloating about raiding an NPO applicant isn't an entirely smart thing to do but you seem to be having fun so knock yourself out.
  6. I reckon this agenda can be voiced in the Unaligned DoW, not LSF's (don't worry, not backseat moderating here!). I realize there isn't one so maybe post an acknowledgement of hostilities declared on this unaligned alliance.
  7. Again, I don't speak for GATO or SLAP here but I will intimate that GATO and Kashmir more or less appear to be on the same page on a number of relevant matters: The brown sphere is a free one provided you don't threaten the harmony of the sphere and the peace and prosperity of both our alliances and our allies'. We do not take kindly to sanctions we place being removed without our permission or at least the courtesy of dialogue on the matter. We do not take kindly to our members, the members of allies, or the members of friendly brown team alliances being sanctioned. Ultimately, we will utilize whatever measures available to counter any nation(s) in violation of one or more of the above principles (such as Harry), particularly when so blatant and when following repeat instances. As well, we will utilize whatever measures available to remove support for those in violation of the above (which is why LSF finds itself a target), particularly when so blatant and when following repeat instances. My apologies, GATO, should it appear that I'm hijacking this thread or that I'm speaking for you. Neither is my intent. I aim merely to outline the reasoning why Kashmir supports GATO here and why we ourselves have taken measures to neuter Harry and remove his support.
  8. Harry's supporters aren't much better than the saboteur himself, but as I stated roughly an hour in advance of your analysis I speak only for Kashmir.
  9. You empower Harry, which allows him to continue to threaten brown team harmony, so you get to suffer along with the rest of his supporters. You'd be burning too if you weren't hiding in PM. Ain't that the truth. Course crusty ol' Zigs suffers from Methrage Complex wherein any and every opportunity is one to whinge and attention-whore. edit: The above and any other posts of mine reflect Kashmir's, not necessarily the OP's, stance.
  10. Sorry, friend, wasn't my intent. Harry's sanctioned me twice now, and shwampy's been an ardent supporter of his, so the compulsion for me to act was real. I made sure to stagger at least.
  11. Harry continues to sabotage brown team harmony and LSF continues to support him. May they all burn under nuclear inferno.
  12. Our second consecutive one-round war is concluded, what an exciting time to be alive!
  13. COBRA are steadfast allies, kudos. o7 Most of the rest of you here are !@#$@#$ idiots though, sadly.
  14. With all due respect, Caustic - and I do mean with all due respect - you sir may eat !@#$. Kindly. As for FEAR, most if not all wars were down-declares. Not complaining one bit, mind you, but it shows strategy more than skill. We all have anecdotes either way showing one side faring better than the other in individual wars but ultimately it's immaterial. We've got war, let's enjoy it if nothing else. Say, Canik, don't you have your war against FAN to plan for anyhow?
  15. >Derides an alliance for being opportunistic >Hits only the alliance with no treaty ties Really though I'm not complaining. We were asked to take part in the mercy killing of ISX so we did. You had a treaty and you honored it in a limited fashion. Life goes on for us both.
  16. Clearly you're in no position to dictate anything. I won't pretend to know exactly what terms other parties are attempting to impose upon you (Kashmir, after all, entered for reasons of its own). For our part, once there are no more slots to be had by the interested parties within Kashmir we'll grant you white peace (as we traditionally do in such a situation). That all said, is it surrendering you find issue with? Other than swollen (generally undue) pride I'll never understand why alliances refuse to admit defeat on principle. Denying the reality of the situation isn't productive for any parties involved.
  17. Yolo04, you really need an off switch.
  18. Voted Methrage because I'm a sadist and look forward to his increasingly inflated ego if he wins. Voted Kashmir shamelessly just because (on the real, we're probably one of the least influential alliances on that list and I'm ok with that).
  19. Methrage is defeated once again. Whether he chooses to admit it or not is ultimately immaterial. In other news, Sambucca and orange juice is !@#$@#$ disgusting, why'd I try this?
  20. Sorry, I'm just disgruntled af in-game and outside of it.
  21. I can confirm, by the way, that Kashmir has spent roughly $4.6 trillion thus far.
×
×
  • Create New...