BloodFury

[quote name='welshgazza1992' timestamp='1336208017' post='2963895'] You really do live in a little world all on your own, don't you? If you wanted to cancel the treaty, just cancel it. We cared about you as much as you cared about us... that's basically the story. All the rest is attention seeking... Put it behind you and move on. We certainly have. [/quote] Ohh, look make witty comment about "live in own little world" due to lack of anything significant to say. Followed by "we cared about as much as you cared about us" when in reality there was no caring after Bob and Joe were couped, and the amount of effort that was put into back channels to keep Ragnarok from being turned into a much needed blast crater shows that there were feelings from one side at one time. But then again you people at Ragnarok know how to really burn friends and allies so they want nothing to do with you again. It really is no wonder that all the good Ragnarok members have left already, or deleted.

Congrats Tetris, but lolcommies? Couldn't find anyone better?

[quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1336199081' post='2963831'] Um, it would be absurd for it not to be taken into consideration, unless I'm living on a planet where DH is not a leading force in politics. Political action that ignores major actors is idiotic at best and I know it's not the case. It might be NPO seeing NG as a potential alliance to win over into its sphere later on, but it's not really ignoring the broader political game. I don't even know if you believe that yourself, but here goes: NG and TLR are extremely similar and very tight and where NG goes TLR will follow and vice versa. Consequently, it's not a big change. The soundbite response you've presented is laughable on the surface. Given you have previously presented the position of NPO somehow winning C&G over(i'm stretching it a bit), I'd see this as part of a broader long-term scheme to co-opt MK's allies. GOD and VE are not really similar and it's always been an odd tie and since the last war, they haven't really been on the same page. [/quote] If I could live in your brain for one day...

So let me get this straight. Pacifica leaves a Color Bloc which lost their usefulness a while ago. NPO says they will continue to share the third senate seat. NPO also says that if said seat becomes abused they will take it away. What is the problem in this? I see nothing wrong with it. In fact anyone would want a senator removed if they were abusing their powers. Pacifica has always had control over the red sphere. I don't see why anyone would be surprised that they would want to and continue to have it be a stable sphere for their alliance to continue to exist in. I know if I had their capabilities of controlling all three senate seats, I wouldn't allow another alliance to have even one. Good move in my opinion to leave behind an antiquated bloc, and to assert their authority and presence.

[quote name='deth2munkies' timestamp='1336085620' post='2963098'] -snip- [/quote] I asked two people that had their names on the original treaty, if they wanted to sign off on the cancellation. An Ode to those that brought us to this place in history. [quote name='Sir Humphrey' timestamp='1336109506' post='2963292'] I realise that it is tempting to exaggerate the implications of this publicity stunt. However, the fact is that The Combine had already declared that it was not prepared to defend RoK, and thus NATO's commitment to defend RoK does not look any juicier than it did previously Edit: Clarification. [/quote] Not prepared to defend Ragnarok? We were more than willing to defend them, and numerous people can attest to this that the will was there to defend them. However after numerous political blunders and mistakes by the Revolutionary Government, continued arrogance, and continued inability to listen to those that offered advice that they should have taken no one in their right mind would be willing to jump into a fire for people that refuse to listen to them. As far as you saying we had suspended the treaty, then perhaps you aren't aware that about a month ago, an attempt was put forth to make one last chance at salvaging a relationship that Ragnarok had shown to no longer be interested in by lifting the suspension. As it was a trivial matter it did not warrant an announcement. However with the relationship still remaining in the same place it was, no real moves were being set forth by Ragnarok in any attempt, levels of disrespect that were continued to be shown by Ragnarok, and the continued floating conversation where a high government member of Ragnarok basically said that they cared more to salvage relations with their old friends than to attempt to fix a fast dying relationship with a treaty partner. It is for those reasons as well as others that lead to this, and I am probably correct in saying so that there is no love lost on either side.

[quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' timestamp='1336075829' post='2962966'] -snip- [/quote] This is the greatest post I have seen in years. Made my day.

[quote name='Emperor Whimsical' timestamp='1336030022' post='2962736'] you didn't announce you were cancelling on kaskus too [/quote] We never had a treaty with Kaskus.

[center][img]http://images.wikia.com/cybernations/images/4/45/The_Combine_Flag.png[/img][/center] Pursuant the "Ragnarok is blingin', baby" treaty, The Combine invokes Article V. GTFO. [quote]V. GTFO If at some point in the future that one or both parties feel its time to end this agreement there will be a 72 hour grace period in which the treaty will still be in effect after an announcement is made of its cancellation.[/quote] To Summarize, Ragnarok is a bad ally. [i]/s/ He Who Shall Not Be Named, Viceroy of The Combine BloodFury, Overlord of The Combine Jason8, Minister of OMG FIRE King Xander, Non Grata Triumvir and Overlord Emperor Marx, No Special Title[/i]

I'm sorry to see this happen.

Down the the Reds.

Ohh lord, what is this madness?

I am not happy with this turn of events. But it is hilarious to see that imbecile King James finally called out for what he is.

[quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1335378992' post='2959016'] I would beg to differ. Which is why I was drawing the distinction between a member's view and that of the alliance. You know the NSO's view of the Combine, we wouldn't hold a treaty if it wasn't a favourable one. [/quote] I was more directing it at him than the whole of NSO to make him aware of whom his allies were.

[quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1335343426' post='2958931'] Sure. I just don't enjoy people misrepresenting the views of my alliance to cast us as bad allies. [/quote] I called an individual a bad ally, not the alliance. If it was the view of your alliance as you so put it right there, then you wouldn't be good allies now would you?

[quote name='New Frontier' timestamp='1335313715' post='2958734'] I never suggested that they did. [/quote] Minor reading error then, however I wouldn't use the term infinitely to describe that GOONS are better than other alliances.

[quote name='Marine Sniper' timestamp='1335317416' post='2958786'] Anathema was a freaking piece of flotsom, did a DOE then 3 days later disbanded [/quote] Six, I made sure it didn't live past a week.

[quote name='New Frontier' timestamp='1335209487' post='2957877'] I'm going to go ahead and say that GOONS are infinitely more competent than the alliances whose members are criticizing them here. I mean, really, the idea that people from the Combine, BAPS, and Odyssey would have the gall to suggest that GOONS was a bad alliance really just blows me away. [/quote] I wasn't aware that regular members of my alliance represented the alliance, but thanks for informing me of this.

I can still see all those NPO Signatures flashing before my eyes as I scrolled down. Congratulations on those that gained gov positions.

I liked you guys. It's a shame to see you disbanded.

[quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' timestamp='1335040884' post='2956728'] Yes, we all know Sparta is the epitome of success. [/quote] I wasn't aware that he was in Sparta, last I checked which was just before posting this, he was in The Combine. [quote name='Griff' timestamp='1335052168' post='2956851'] *Looks at your AA* Ahahahah. Anyways, as someone who's fought GOONS before, I can safely say you're full of it. [/quote] As for someone that holds a treaty with The Combine, it is interesting to see the New Sith Order's opinion of their ally.

[quote name='ShouAS' timestamp='1335115512' post='2957184'] shhhh, it's funnier watching people act high and mighty without a clue. [/quote] It's actually rather disgusting that we have a rising level of Weeaboo's on this world.

[quote name='Jens of the desert' timestamp='1335098995' post='2957102'] Clearly someone is good at hiding their true intentions from you then [/quote] Same person had you fooled for the longest time.

There will only ever be one Weeaboo Alliance that I will ever recognize, and that is New Sakura Order. This is just disgusting, even for you Roquentin.

Well, I expect another alliance to attack GOONS in a month or so.

[quote name='Sardonic' timestamp='1334982616' post='2956411'] Well there is also the fact that I've been in this GOONS government for going on three years now. [/quote] So age of running an alliance determines the qualifications of being a good leader? So, does this make Xiphosis a 'GOD'?