• Announcements

    • Sentinel

      Cyber Nations Forum Rules   07/03/2016

        Cyber Nations Forum Rules  
      In the process of registering on this forum, all players--including you--agreed to accept these terms and conditions and the terms and conditions of Invision Power Board. In doing so you essentially signed an electronic contract pledging to have read the rules and TOS and agreeing to follow the rules and TOS as written. It is your continued responsibility to read, follow, and keep up-to-date with the CN rules.
      The following are basic guidelines for use of the Cyber Nations community forum. Anyone caught disobeying these guidelines will be issued a warning. The forum staff works on a five warn limit policy unless the situation calls for more appropriate action ranging from a verbal warning to a double warn and suspension to an immediate ban, etc.   Just because something is not listed specifically here as illegal does not mean it's allowed. All players are expected to use common sense and are personally responsible for reading the pinned threads found in the Moderation forum. Questions regarding appropriateness or other concerns can be sent via PM to an appropriate moderator.   A permanent ban on the forums results in a game ban, and vice versa. Please note that the in-game warn system works on a "three strikes you're out" policy and that in-game actions (including warnings and deletions) may not be appealed. For more information regarding in-game rules please read the Cyber Nations Game Rules.   1.) First Warning
      2.) Second Warning
      3.) Third Warning (48 hour suspension at the forum)
      4.) Fourth Warning (120 hour suspension at the forum)
      5.) Permanent Ban   Game Bans and Forum Bans
      If you receive a 100% warn level on the forums, you will be subject to removal from the forums AND have your nation deleted and banned from the game at moderator(s) discretion.   If you are banned in the game, then you will be banned from the forums.   Process of Appeals
      Players may not appeal any in-game actions. This includes cheat flags, canceled trades, content removals, warn level increases, nation deletion, and bans from the game.   Players may appeal individual forum warnings. You may only appeal a warning if you can show with evidence that it was unwarranted or unduly harsh. If a reasonable amount of time has passed (no less than one month and preferably longer) in which you have demonstrated reformed behavior than you may request a warning level reduction. Wasting staff time with inappropriately filed reports and/or unfounded appeals will result in a warn level raise. Repeat incidences will result in a ban from the forum.   Bans are permanent. Banned players may appeal to the Senior Staff if they believe grounds exist (very, very rare) in which they state their case with evidence and why explain why they believe they deserve to be allowed back into Cyber Nations. This process is not quick and the investigation into cases may last three minutes or three weeks or more depending on the individual situation.   The only place where discussion of moderator action is acceptable is in the appropriate Moderation forum. Posting commentary on or disagreement with moderator action elsewhere will result in a warn level raise.   Posting
      All posts must be in English. Common phrases in other languages will be allowed so long as they are translated upon request. Foreign languages are permitted in signatures and avatars, however.   Certain areas of the forum require you to have a nation in either standard CN or CN:TE. If you have...   A SE and a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are allowed to post in either SE or TE areas of the forum. You must have your CN:TE nation name listed in your profile to post in the CN:TE section of the forum.
      Just an SE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are not allowed to post in any TE areas of the forum.
      Just a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your TE nation name or ruler name. Your must have your CN:TE nation name listed correctly in your profile. You are not allowed to post in any of the SE areas. You are allowed to post in the water cooler, question center and the moderation forums. Other than that, all your posts need to stay in the TE area.   Flame/Flamebait/Trolling
      Flaming is expressing anger or lobbing insults at a person/player rather than a character, post, idea, etc. Flamebait are posts that are made with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking another user into rule-breaking. Trolling is submitting posts with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking a specific group into rule-breaking. Forum users should not be participating in any of these, and doing so will result in a warning.   Topic Hijacking
      Hijacking is forcing the current thread discussion off of the original topic and usually results in spam or flame from either side. Forum users found hijacking threads will be given a warning.   Repeat Topics
      One topic is enough. Repeat topics will be locked, removed, and the author given a warning. Users found creating repeat topics after others were locked by staff will receive a warn raise.   Joke Topics
      Topics created as a joke are prohibited. Joke topics will be locked and the author warned. This includes topics in which the author is making an announcement “for” another in-game alliance. Humorous threads are permitted; it is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what is merely satire and what is actually a joke topic.   Spam
      Spam is defined as creating posts or topics containing only contentless material of any kind. Users found spamming will receive a warning. Examples include (but are in no way limited to) posts containing nothing but smilies, "+1", "QFT", "this" any other one/few-word contentless combination, joke threads, or posts containing quotes and anything that counts as spam by itself. Adding words to a post with the express intent of avoiding a spam warn will result in a warning. These posts and other similar contributions have no substance and hence are considered spam. Posts of "Ave", "Hail" or any other one word congratulatory type are acceptable as one word posts. Emoticon type posts such as "o/" without accompanying text is still not allowed. Posts containing only images are considered spam, unless the image is being used in the Alliance Politics sub-forum and then the actual text of the image be placed into spoiler tags.   Posting in All Caps
      Posting large amounts of text in capital letters is not permitted. Use discretion when using your caps lock key.   No Discussion Forums
      There are forums that are not for discussion and are used strictly for game and forum staff to address certain issues, bugs, etc. The following forums are not open to discussion: Report Game Abuse, Report Forum Abuse, and Warn/Ban Appeals. Only moderators and the original poster may post in a thread, period, with absolutely no exceptions. Users found disobeying this guideline will receive an automatic warning for each offense.   Moderation Forums
      All Moderation forums also maintain pinned threads clearly marked as required reading before posting. Failure to read and follow required reading and procedure in a Moderation forum will result in a warning. Examples include posting requests in the wrong forum, failure to include all required information in posts, etc. The standard of conduct and enforcement of rules in Moderation forums is strictly enforced and the repercussions for disregarding rules or disrespecting staff are harsh. Read the pinned threads before posting and you will be fine.   Namecalling
      Excessive or unqualified namecalling is not allowed in IC forums; namecalling should also never make up the bulk of a post. Namecalling is prohibited entirely in all OOC forums.   Filtered Words
      Any attempts to evade the word filter will result in a warning. The terms we have filtered are filtered for a reason and no excuse for evasion will be accepted. Filter evasion includes censoring or deliberately misspelling part of a filtered word.   If you link to a website, image, video, etc., containing profanity, please post a disclaimer before the link. The moderation staff may still remove links if the content is deemed too obscene.   Harassment
      Forum users should not be stalking/harassing others on the forums. Anyone found stalking players from topic to topic, etc., will be subject to a warning.   Gravedigging
      Gravedigging is not allowed anywhere on the forums. Gravedigging is "bumping" old topics which haven't been active for quite some time (four to seven days is standard depending on the nature of the thread and how many pages back it had been pushed before bump). Your warn level will be raised if you are caught doing this.   The Suggestion Box and Black Market forums are partial exceptions to this rule. Suggestions/ideas in that forum may be posted in regardless of age PROVIDING that the reviving post contains constructive, on-topic input to the original topic or discussion. Black Market threads may be bumped by the author if there is new information about the offered exchange (i.e open aid slots). In the Player Created Alliances forum it will not be considered gravedigging to bump a topic up to a year old, so long as the alliance in question still exists and it is not a duplicate thread.   Signatures
      Those who fail to read and abide by these rules will have their signatures removed and receive a warning.   You may have only one image per signature which may not exceed the maximum size of 450 pixels wide by 150 pixels tall. You may have no more than 8 lines of text and text size cannot exceed size 4. Each quote-tag, image and empty line count as a line.   Inappropriate Images and Other Disallowed Images
      Images that are sexual in nature or have sexual overtones are prohibited. It is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what constitutes sexual overtones. Depictions of kissing are permissible provided there are no sexual implications. Images depicting female nipples are prohibited outright.   Making “ASCII art” is prohibited regardless of the image depicted.   Using photos or likenesses of another Cyber Nations player is also prohibited.   Drug References
      Images and posts promoting illegal drug use are prohibited. References to drugs are acceptable only if the moderation staff deems that it is not promoting the use thereof.   Obscene Content and/or "Account Suicide"
      Anyone caught posting vulgar material (including but in no way limited to pornography, "gross," "tubgirl," "lemonparty," photos depicting RL illegal acts such as violence towards humans or animals, child pornography, death photos, and any other obscene or offensive material in either text form or picture form) will have their account(s) permanently banned, and their ISP contacted along with any other applicable internet and RL authorities.   OOC Threats / Revealing Personal Information
      An OOC threat of any nature will equate to an automatic ban from the game and forums. Likewise, the publishing of personal information of any other player without their explicit permission is grounds for warning and/or a ban from the game depending on the severity of the offense.   Death Threats / Death Wishes
      A death threat or a death wish of any nature (including but not limited to telling another player to commit suicide) will result in at very least a 40% warn level increase and 2 day suspension from the forums, with harsher punishments, including a complete ban from the forums and game, up to the discretion of the moderation staff.   Quoting Rulebreaking Posts
      Do not quote any post with obscene content or any other content that has to be removed by the moderation staff. Doing so makes it more difficult for the moderation staff to find and remove all such content and will result in a warn level increase. Putting rulebreaking posts of any kind in your signature is prohibited.   Forum Names
      With the exception of moderator accounts, all forum accounts must match up exactly with the ruler name or nation name of your in-game country. Those found not matching up will be warned and banned immediately. Forum account names may not be profane or offensive.   Multiple Forum Accounts
      With the exception of moderators, if you are caught with multiple forum accounts, the multiple account(s) will be banned, warn level raised, and your identity will be announced by a moderator to the CN community so rule-abiding players can take IC action against you. Multiple forum account offenders will receive a varying percentage warn level raise and/or a permanent ban on a case-by-case basis.   Posting For Other Players
      Posting for banned or suspended players is prohibited, as is posting for any person without a nation. This includes making warn and ban appeals on their behalf.   Imitation &. Impersonation
      Imitation in terms of this forum is mimicking the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in an attempt to be satirical or generally humorous. Impersonation in terms of this forum is copying the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in order to present the illusion that the person is in fact that user. Imitation is fine and can be quite funny. Impersonation is disruptive and is warnable. Please pay attention to the subtle difference between these two concepts.   A player may not impersonate another player by emulating the characteristics of someone else's past or present account in an attempt to harass, stalk, or flamebait. Creating a new forum account in an attempt to impersonate a standing account will result in deletion and banning without notice.   Any attempt at imitation and/or impersonation of moderators and game staff is strictly prohibited and will be met with harsh repercussions.   Avatars
      Size for avatars is limited by the forum mechanics, therefore there is no size issue for a user to worry about. Avatars must be in good taste, and any avatar containing a picture that is too violent, disgusting, sexually explicit, insulting to another player or staff member, etc. will be removed. Avatars that are potentially seizure inducing will not be permitted. Players may not "borrow" the avatars of any moderator past or present without permission.   Swastikas and Nazi Imagery
      The swastika may not be used in signatures or avatars. Pictures of swastika's are acceptable for use in the In Character (IC) sections of the roleplay forums, so long as its context is In Character, and not Out Of Character. Pictures of Hitler, mentioning of the Holocaust, etc... have no place in the roleplay forums, since these people and events existed in real life, and have no bearing or place in the Cyberverse. Other Nazi or SS imagery is forbidden in all forums.   Moderation Staff
      The revealing of the private identities of any Cyber Nations staffers past or present is strictly prohibited, and thus no speculation/accusation of identity is allowed. Doing so is grounds for moderator action against your account appropriate to the offense, including a full forum/game ban.   Claims of moderator bias should be directed to the highest level of authority--the Head Game & Forum Mod/Admin, Keelah. Claims of moderator bias without supporting evidence is grounds for a warning.   Blatant disrespect of the moderator staff is strictly prohibited. This includes but is not limited to spoofing moderator accounts in any way, sig/avatar references, baiting, flaming, rude demands, mocking, attitude, and unsubstantiated claims of bias. They are volunteers hired to enforce the rules. If you have a problem with the way a moderator is enforcing the rules or the rules themselves please contact Keelah.   Attempting to use the moderation staff as a weapon by abusing the report system in an attempt to get another player warned or banned is strictly prohibited.   Do not ask about becoming or campaign to become a moderator. The moderators are drawn from CN membership but moderation positions are by invitation only. Asking to become one will substantially decrease your chances of ever being asked.   Aiding Rule Violators
      Any user found to know of a serious rule violation without reporting it to a game moderator (eg. knowledge of a user with multiple nations) will be given a warning or, in more serious cases, have their nation deleted.   Aiding Banned Players
      Any user found to be harboring, aiding or otherwise knowingly helping a banned user will be deleted. This includes knowing of their existence within the game without reporting it to the game-moderation staff.   Questionable Actions and Content
      The forum rules are not designed to cover every scenario. Any action that is seen to be counter-productive or harmful to the forum community may be met with moderator action against your account. The Cyber Nations Moderation Staff reserves the right to take action against your account without warning for any reason at any time.   Private Transactions
      Nation selling and other private transactions via such auction sites like eBay is against the Cyber Nations terms and conditions. While our moderators cannot control what people do outside of the game you are not allowed to promote such private exchanges on our forums without expressed permission from admin only. Anyone found to be engaging in such activity without permission will be banned from the game.   Advertising
      Advertising other browser games and forums is prohibited. Soliciting donations towards commercial causes is also prohibited. If you wish to ask for donations towards a charitable cause, please contact a moderator before doing so.   Extorting Donations
      Donations are excluded from any kind of IC payment. Anyone found extorting others for OOC payments will be warned in-game and/or banned.   Third Party Software
      Third party software is not allowed to be advertised on these forums by any means (post, signature, PM, etc). These programs can easily be used to put malware on the user's computer, and as such can cause huge security issues. Anybody who is caught spreading links to these will at the very least have their warning level increased.   Other Forum Terms & Rules   Please take a moment to review these rules detailed below. If you agree with them and wish to proceed with the registration, simply click the "Register" button below. To cancel this registration, simply hit the 'back' button on your browser.   Please remember that we are not responsible for any messages posted. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. USE THE WEB SITE AT YOUR OWN RISK. We will not be liable for any damages for any reason. THIS WEB SITE IS PROVIDED TO YOU "AS IS," WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.   The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this bulletin board. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact us immediately by email. We have the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.   You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this bulletin board to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.   You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or by this bulletin board.
Immortan Junka

Libertarian Party of Cybernations Consent Decree

201 posts in this topic

2 hours ago, Immortan Junka said:

Ok then, see you after the reroll!

Maybe. Also whether someone is a member or leader within the LPC depends on the individual and not the alliance.

 

The LPC can't force rules on member alliances, the LPC exists only as a concept to bring out the best in people and anything resembling a leader of the LPC exists only as much as others want to follow the lead of others. Members don't need to get voted in, they are only members as much as they are perceived to be based on present actions.

 

SNX can never monopolize the LPC their own, at best he show leadership by showing them the right direction. SNX voting for Senators who haven't agreed to Libertarian Manifesto proves they aren't LPC. The LPC is a leaderless movement, where anyone can rise to the moment and help lead people.

 

The LPC was never an alliance bloc, but purely a political organization. Each SNX Senator would need to agree with the LPC manifesto. SNX voting non-LPC senators at the expense of the last LPC senator losing their seat would prove they have 0 LPC

 

I reserve the right to revive the LPC under my leadership at anytime if Sigrun and aNiMaLz both give up on the Senate or stop recognizing you as the LPC.

 

You won't have inherited the LPC just by pushing all LPC senators out. Maybe I'll make it better next time. ;)

 

Edited by Sephiroth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/22/2017 at 3:31 PM, Sephiroth said:

Junka will be the Trojan horse for the new LPCN, just as he was for Doom.

 

Even if he's not in charge, he projects himself to represent as to be the face of it. Doesn't matter how reasonable Sigrun is if almost everyone sees Junka as the driving force behind the LPC.

 

Is that so...?

kK0UWIo.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Sephiroth said:

Maybe. Also whether someone is a member or leader within the LPC depends on the individual and not the alliance.

 

 

As always, the LPC accepts both sovereign solos and alliances as members. "Big Tent" remember?

 

41 minutes ago, Sephiroth said:

The LPC can't force rules on member alliances, the LPC exists only as a concept to bring out the best in people and anything resembling a leader of the LPC exists only as much as others want to follow the lead of others. Members don't need to get voted in, they are only members as much as they are perceived to be based on present actions.

 

 

The LPC can and, should it become necessary, will enforce within that 'Big Tent' concept. And members, of course, do indeed get 'voted in' in every case. You can vote yourself in as an associate member simply by voting for our candidate. You know all this.

 

41 minutes ago, Sephiroth said:

SNX can never monopolize the LPC their own, at best he show leadership by showing them the right direction. SNX voting for Senators who haven't agreed to Libertarian Manifesto proves they aren't LPC. The LPC is a leaderless movement, where anyone can rise to the moment and help lead people.

 

The LPC was never an alliance bloc, but purely a political organization. Each SNX Senator would need to agree with the LPC manifesto. SNX voting non-LPC senators at the expense of the last LPC senator losing their seat would prove they have 0 LPC

 

I reserve the right to revive the LPC under my leadership at anytime if Sigrun and aNiMaLz both give up on the Senate or stop recognizing you as the LPC.

 

You won't have inherited the LPC just by pushing all LPC senators out. Maybe I'll make it better next time. ;)

 

 

Dude. Dude.

 

Monopolize? I suppose it's possible we all get so sick and tired of this we just join SnX to spite you, but no. That's not even an idea.

 

Their senators have not assented to the manifesto? What, I'm supposed to hunt them down individually and administer an oath? They have taken an oath to Junka, Junka has to us, you know how things work.

 

"Purely a political organization" exactly. Pay attention to your own words man. You're the one that tried over and over again to make it more than that and I'm the one that always refused. Now you finally understand? GOOD, GET ONBOARD!

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Alonso Quixano said:

 

No, but there have been more than just this latest person, whom left ISX, and has said bad things about it. When there are more ex-members speaking out against ISX, than current, non-gov, members speaking up for it. It sure does say something. 

 

You may wish to ignore that there has always been more detractors than defenders of the Imperium, especially from those who have left. I have never talked to someone who has left the Imperium who had a positive experience in it. 

 

Also. The "big boy" forums are not representative of every nation speaking out against the Imperium. As well as, this ex-member speaking out on the forums, I have a hard time believing that he barely interacted with his previous AA, when he is out on the main forums interacting with the world. Unless he is an anomaly, which is doubtful, he probably interacted fairly consistently with his previous AA, and you're just down playing it. 

How many ISX or LPC members do you think are even aware of this conversation and previous ones like it? How many are competent or interested enough to know what's going on? How much disinformation and propaganda do you think they are fed by their leaders when they are aware of it?

Based on my interactions with Seph and Junka, I can only imagine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Fox Fire said:

How many ISX or LPC members do you think are even aware of this conversation and previous ones like it? How many are competent or interested enough to know what's going on? How much disinformation and propaganda do you think they are fed by their leaders when they are aware of it?

Based on my interactions with Seph and Junka, I can only imagine. 

 

In my experience most rulers in this world not only do not read and rarely if ever post here, they (quite understandably) have no desire to change that in any way.

Edited by Sigrun Vapneir
broader yet even more true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All our members have to do is read this thread and see LH, Methrage and others posting and they instantly know what's going on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lord Hershey said:

 

Is that so...?

kK0UWIo.png

 

Hahaha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Galerion said:

Which marker, how would you know? you were not a point of commination nor did you use all the other channels of communications.

 

According to your indoctrinator, people don't post much and everywhere barring a couple of government and staff areas is a ghost town.

 

When you make grand claims of high activity, don't moan when someone criticises the obvious lie.

 

14 hours ago, Galerion said:

You tried to add credibility to your opinion by implying you had seen something on our forum that contradicts Junka's claim of being offered his LPCN title, this is a falsehood.

I don't know what your problem is or why you feel the need to attempt to undermine factual events but when you do things like that you are going to get called out on it.

 

Is it really factual? Fortunately I'm not a snake like your friends and colleges because according to Sigrun, Junka and others I should of stored it all for later use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Jay Kay said:

 

According to your indoctrinator, people don't post much and everywhere barring a couple of government and staff areas is a ghost town.

 

When you make grand claims of high activity, don't moan when someone criticises the obvious lie.

 

 

Is it really factual? Fortunately I'm not a snake like your friends and colleges because according to Sigrun, Junka and others I should of stored it all for later use.

 

It is factual I don't know why your even trying to call it into question.

 

80-90% of the alliance is consistently active this is shown on the alliance page and considering the number of active members in the alliance puts us in the top 10 pretty regularly (when sorted by activity) I really don't think it is a exaggeration. Your criticising based on a limited view and without comparing to the vast number of alliances on bob.

In the last few days we have setup a discord server and the uptake by the membership joining that server has been much better than IRC but than you wouldn't be able to compare it to IRC as you didn't use it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Galerion said:

 

It is factual I don't know why your even trying to call it into question.

 

Being selective with the truth, means overall it was the truth barring a few details. The fact a few of you have been tripping over each others feet to deny it, is being overly defensive. 

 

You know what they say about overly defensive people, they're hiding something :)

 

Quote

 

80-90% of the alliance is consistently active this is shown on the alliance page and considering the number of active members in the alliance puts us in the top 10 pretty regularly (when sorted by activity) I really don't think it is a exaggeration. Your criticising based on a limited view and without comparing to the vast number of alliances on bob.

In the last few days we have setup a discord server and the uptake by the membership joining that server has been much better than IRC but than you wouldn't be able to compare it to IRC as you didn't use it.

 

That marker is nonsense, someone logging in for a minute then not seen for the next couple of days isn't active.

 

I checked most available places within your alliance to gauge membership activity, there wasn't much.

 

I have better things to do than argue in circle over your sour grapes.

Edited by Jay Kay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Galerion said:

the alliance is consistently active this is shown on the alliance page

 

Our forums are more active than our stats page shows. That page means nothing for your community activity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Jay Kay said:

That marker is nonsense, someone logging in for a minute then not seen for the next couple of days isn't active.

 

It may not be a marker that accurately reflects all alliances but it is fairly applied to all alliances and is really the only marker available to compare all alliances to.

 

9 minutes ago, Jay Kay said:

I checked most available places within your alliance to gauge membership activity, there wasn't much.

 

And I believe your execution and assessment are flawed.

 

18 minutes ago, Jay Kay said:

I have better things to do than argue in circle over your sour grapes.

 

What sour grapes would I have? Your the one who started casting aspersions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not "defensive" to leave hostile propaganda unanswered. I don't believe in passively allowing others to control the public narrative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jay Kay said:

Is it really factual? Fortunately I'm not a snake like your friends and colleges because according to Sigrun, Junka and others I should of stored it all for later use.

 

Yeah, no. That's not how it works. That would be a recipe for war.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Rayvon said:

 

Our forums are more active than our stats page shows. That page means nothing for your community activity.

 

No offense to other styles of government, but In all the alliances I have been in, I've always found "community activity," whatever that is, to be a waste of time and energy. Alot of former SNX members went to MI6 for "community activity" and we saw how that ended.

 

An alliance should be 100% focused on achieving IC objectives, not engaged in unproductive fields of activity. The "community activity" of my first alliance FCC resulted in weekly arguing and near-civil wars, not conducive to survival.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Galerion said:

What sour grapes would I have? Your the one who started casting aspersions.

 

I made a singular comment the rolling aspersions where created by you, Junka and Sigrun trying to prove something, I've just been adding informed responses to them along the way. :)

 

20 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said:

It's not "defensive" to leave hostile propaganda unanswered. I don't believe in passively allowing others to control the public narrative.

 

"Selective truth"? damn that's some hostile propaganda, a friend needs to bring you back down on solid ground as you're up there with the birds.

 

16 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said:

Yeah, no. That's not how it works. That would be a recipe for war.

 

I like how you didn't refute that comment, sorry I don't collect information like you do for future use. I have more class. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said:

No offense to other styles of government, but In all the alliances I have been in, I've always found "community activity," whatever that is, to be a waste of time and energy.

 

Of course its unimportant to you as you need all the time you have to write and post bi-weekly indoctrination propaganda for home and abroad :P

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The individual ego is strong with this one. Good luck in Polar once you get in an argument with Grub, he's not as nice as I am.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Jay Kay said:

 

Of course its unimportant to you as you need all the time you have to write and post bi-weekly indoctrination propaganda for home and abroad :P

 

 

If you stuck around for one of our wars you might have seen how effective our post-Revolutionary system is. Our members have fought more than the vast majority of nations in the last two years and it's shaped our alliance today. Our entire existence is shaped around defending our sovereignty, membership and ideology.

Edited by Immortan Junka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said:

 

No offense to other styles of government, but In all the alliances I have been in, I've always found "community activity," whatever that is, to be a waste of time and energy. Alot of former SNX members went to MI6 for "community activity" and we saw how that ended.

 

An alliance should be 100% focused on achieving IC objectives, not engaged in unproductive fields of activity. The "community activity" of my first alliance FCC resulted in weekly arguing and near-civil wars, not conducive to survival.

 

We'll get right on doing what you say we should. We've been one foot in, one foot out for a long time since politics died. The only IC activity going on is your bloc drama. You enjoy focusing all your time and energy on Meth. We've all watched this play out over and over and over for years. It's a boring re-run. 

 

If you have no community, you have no consensus. You have one or two persons *cough cough* directing sheep. Enjoy your sheep.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said:

The individual ego is strong with this one. Good luck in Polar once you get in an argument with Grub, he's not as nice as I am.

 

I see that you're looking in the mirror again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Rayvon said:

 

We'll get right on doing what you say we should. We've been one foot in, one foot out for a long time since politics died. The only IC activity going on is your bloc drama. You enjoy focusing all your time and energy on Meth. We've all watched this play out over and over and over for years. It's a boring re-run. 

 

If you have no community, you have no consensus. You have one or two persons *cough cough* directing sheep. Enjoy your sheep.

 

I am the sheepdog, and I arm the sheep.

 

a.daa-small-heavily-armed-sheep.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎1‎/‎26‎/‎2017 at 9:25 PM, Sephiroth said:

Maybe. Also whether someone is a member or leader within the LPC depends on the individual and not the alliance.

 

The LPC can't force rules on member alliances, the LPC exists only as a concept to bring out the best in people and anything resembling a leader of the LPC exists only as much as others want to follow the lead of others. Members don't need to get voted in, they are only members as much as they are perceived to be based on present actions.

 

SNX can never monopolize the LPC their own, at best he show leadership by showing them the right direction. SNX voting for Senators who haven't agreed to Libertarian Manifesto proves they aren't LPC. The LPC is a leaderless movement, where anyone can rise to the moment and help lead people.

 

The LPC was never an alliance bloc, but purely a political organization. Each SNX Senator would need to agree with the LPC manifesto. SNX voting non-LPC senators at the expense of the last LPC senator losing their seat would prove they have 0 LPC

 

I reserve the right to revive the LPC under my leadership at anytime if Sigrun and aNiMaLz both give up on the Senate or stop recognizing you as the LPC.

 

You won't have inherited the LPC just by pushing all LPC senators out. Maybe I'll make it better next time. ;)

 

there is so much wrong with all this sigrun is a senator and was not pushed out, and snx senators are lpcn senators because snx is in the lpcn which means all the members are too.

 

the lpcn is not a leaderless movement really I mean u called urself the leader a 1000 times and even said u were like the main boss and said sigrun and rukunu just had basically joke titles and u and u alone decided who is lpcn and all that the comments u made about this are all over but junka never made any of the crazy claims u hAve about having authority or final say

 

he didn't inherite the lpcn by pushing out senators he inherited by animalz and sigrun voting him in.

 

ur so crazy in the very same thread u say

 

"The LPC is a leaderless movement, where anyone can rise to the moment and help lead people." but then u say

 

"I reserve the right to revive the LPC under my leadership"

 

u crazy bro u don't even make sense like its been said if u care about lpcn join animalz and after a while I'm sure rukunu might let u have his triumvir position since he isn't all about politics anyway and then maybe u can convince the other two tri to start having a vote with in the whole lpcn to see who will be "supreme triumvir" and then get ur old position back like that but crying and going crazy on the forums will get u nothing guay believe me

 

is it u care about the lpcn who has been doing great since junka or is it u care to be senator and supreme triumvir??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what are you on about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎1‎/‎28‎/‎2017 at 11:49 AM, Caliph said:

what are you on about?

was this message for me? if so don't worry about it if not I sorry for confusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now