Jump to content

Fifth Column Confederation - Confederatio Aesir Treaty


Recommended Posts

“Friendship is born at that moment when one person says to another: "What! You too? I thought I was the only one.”
C.S. Lewis

 

 

 

 

Preamble

Through the simple act of conversation, bonds of friendship are born. These bonds, once
brought forth, are then strengthened through aid, and through effort. Such is the case between these two great alliances. Through the generosity of comrades in spirit, and by the deliberate effort of all parties, we now seek to formalize this relationship through the ratification of this treaty.

Peace and Friendship

The signatories of these accords do hereby swear to honor each other in their open world dealings, to harbor no aggressive intent towards one another, and to do all in their power to avoid doing injury to one another’s growth or standing. If this is clause is infringed upon, the signatories also swear to do all that can be reasonably expected to deal with the matter in a private diplomatic fashion.

Intelligence and Information

The signatories of this treaty do hereby swear to freely share all information pertinent to one another, be it of a military, or financial nature. This is to be accomplished through the continued usage of one another’s IRC channels, and through the establishment of Embassies in each of the signatories forums.

Aid and Defense

The signatories of this treaty do hereby grant each other the right to freely seek financial aid in the event that a nation of one signatory is unable to secure said aid through their own alliances means. This is to be accomplished through an appeal by the ambassadors of either signatory, or through the established embassies. Furthermore, the signatories of this treaty do hereby give notice that they have established an Optional Defense Pact between one another. In the event that war should befall one signatory, it is recommended that due consideration be given by the other to providing military assistance. This recommendation is solely in the event of a defensive war however.

Trade and Growth

The signatories of this treaty do hereby grant preferred trade status to one another. In the event that trade circles are unable to be formed fully by one alliance, all effort shall be made to seek help from a fellow signatory. Furthermore, as prefered trade partners, all reasonable effort shall be made to formulate tech deals within the boundaries of these accords. While outside tech deals are by no means restricted, the terms of this clause should form the basis of a strong tech trade between our two alliances.

Cancellation

Should either signatory wish to revoke the terms of the treaty, they shall give forty-eight hours of notice, during which interim the established peace between the signatories shall remain in effect.

 

 

Fcc_fcc_main_bar_flag_300x200.png
 

Signed for the Fifth Column Confederation

Black Jack Talon - Director
Astelria - Minister of Foreign Affairs

 

CA_Flag.png

 

Signed for Confederatio Aesir

 

Sigrun Vepneir Moussing Odensdotter - Queen of the Aesir

Methrage - The Royal Predator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is this, 2007?

 

This is the Fifth Column Confederation. 

 

 

We believe in a Non-Interventionist Position, with honest, friendly relations with all. We believe that Cybernations was, is, and shall be a wonderful game, filled with incredible people. It is our sincerest desire to build positive relationships with any and all. 

 

So, 

 

 

Whos next to get their FCC Treaty on?  :ehm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just out of curiosity, wasn't Methrage in the FCC of old, or is my memory that bad?

Yes, I was in the original FCC for quite a while and held many government positions in it. I've gotten to know the leadership and members of this reformed FCC and I'm glad to see them bring the FCC back. BJT is doing a great job leading the FCC in a positive direction and bringing new blood into the alliance.

Edited by Methrage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the Fifth Column Confederation. 

 

 

We believe in a Non-Interventionist Position, with honest, friendly relations with all. We believe that Cybernations was, is, and shall be a wonderful game, filled with incredible people. It is our sincerest desire to build positive relationships with any and all. 

 

So, 

 

 

Whos next to get their FCC Treaty on?  :ehm:

Nicely stated, Mr. Director!

 

We have been blessed in the ties we have forged so far, and this treaty is certainly no exception! I look with excitement to the future in regards to our current friends as well as those we have yet to meet. :)

 

With that said I can only be happy to see yet another partner by our side, and look forward to where we'll go together. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the Fifth Column Confederation. 

 

 

We believe in a Non-Interventionist Position, with honest, friendly relations with all. We believe that Cybernations was, is, and shall be a wonderful game, filled with incredible people. It is our sincerest desire to build positive relationships with any and all. 

 

So, 

 

 

Whos next to get their FCC Treaty on?  :ehm:

A new FCC or did you just all wake up from that deep slumber you were in?

 

I'm asking without animosity. We were one of your very long treaty partners but the last year we tried talking to you, folks, we were utterly unable to reach people. Not just government, people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack was an original FCC cabinet member, and wished to revive the FCC. Thus is the present incarnation of the FCC.

 

Thus is our rebirth. If you wish to continue our relationship I invite you to our forums and IRC, you will find friends both new and old.

 

Or at least you will enjoy my crumpets. I don't make them for nothing, although at times I feel I am taken advantage of. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack was an original FCC cabinet member, and wished to revive the FCC. Thus is the present incarnation of the FCC.

 

Thus is our rebirth. If you wish to continue our relationship I invite you to our forums and IRC, you will find friends both new and old.

 

Or at least you will enjoy my crumpets. I don't make them for nothing, although at times I feel I am taken advantage of. :(

 

 

She is. She certainly is. 

 

But yeah, I began my first nation in end of 2006/start of 2007 and soon after joined the FCC. I was with them for almost 2 years, learning the ropes. I worked up to a gov position for a while before leaving. (at the time they were completely neutral, and I wanted to experience war.) I then started my own alliance for a bit, before leaving in 2009-2010 area. 

 

I rerolled a few months ago, discovered the FCC was gone, joined NATO, started an FCC clan for a different game, Left NATO, brought a few of those members over, found some other great members here, and we started the FCC. 

 

 

 

A new FCC or did you just all wake up from that deep slumber you were in?

 

I'm asking without animosity. We were one of your very long treaty partners but the last year we tried talking to you, folks, we were utterly unable to reach people. Not just government, people.

 

And No worries, I meant to answer without animosity as well. My tone should be read as a slight twinkle in the eye. 

 

From my discussions with Argent, who protected their AA. After Methrage left, it just...stopped. They never officially disbanded, but members went inactive or moved on until their was no one left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A has-been alliance and a completely irrelevant one.. How quaint. I hope you enjoy your union, it was a match made in heaven.

I don't recognize you, but you do your alliance a disservice. I suppose I can understand if you want to hold a petty grudge that we defended our allies when TOP declared on them, but it was pretty short sighted of you guys to suddenly jump to the other side of the treaty web allying MK, when most of your allies who had fought alongside you until then were aligned on the other side of the treaty web largely so they wouldn't be stuck defending MK when you guys eventually fought them and would be able to fully support you in your war against them. If you have a grudge, you're in range and shouldn't bottle up so much anger. So go ahead and take a shot at me.

 

I still do respect a great portion of the TOP membership and find it unfortunate we ended up on opposite sides of the war, but you not so much. Stay classy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A has-been alliance and a completely irrelevant one.. How quaint. I hope you enjoy your union, it was a match made in heaven.

 

 

You demean your alliance with this sort of useless comment. TOP is better then that, and evidentally better then you. 

 

I wish TOP the best of luck going forwards, and would be happy to chat with their Leadership with regards to our former treaty. 

 

As the FCC never technically disbanded, we are doing what we can to honor at least the intent of former treaties.

 

#FCC on IRC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another methrage post with oh so many words and oh so little content.. What's new.

 

I never liked you guys when we were allied, your organization and structure is flawed not to mention the moralist BS that your gov used to spew on a daily basis. So excuse me for not hailing your triumphant return. I do congratulate y'all on your treaty, like I said earlier it's a match made in heaven. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another methrage post with oh so many words and oh so little content.. What's new.

 

I never liked you guys when we were allied, your organization and structure is flawed not to mention the moralist BS that your gov used to spew on a daily basis. So excuse me for not hailing your triumphant return. I do congratulate y'all on your treaty, like I said earlier it's a match made in heaven. 

Your comments make no sense, considering the organization and structure was changed completely with an entirely new charter when I was elected King and led the alliance for about a year; starting towards the end of the year before the Karma War happened and ending towards the end of that year. The FCC grew from have declined to less than 500k NS to the growing somewhere between 1.5 and 2 Million NS in the few months I had before the Karma War, then hovered around that range until I resigned in the fall later that year when I became more busy and wasn't as active as I used to be. Now the FCC has a newly written charter again with new leadership, so it has a new structure and organization again. I also don't think you know what you're talking about, since I'm not even in the FCC anymore.

 

If you're referring to the structure before I became King, then there were flaws which is the reason the structure was changed completely with a new charter, making it into a Monarchy after the FCC realized it needed to change to come back from its decline due to inactivity at the time. After I left the FCC's government structure changed again, which is when the alliance became inactive and faded away after a while. However the structure of the FCC, both when I led the alliance and the new structure under BlackJackTalon's leadership are completely different from how it was originally or in the time between him and me leading it.

 

So your rants don't make sense either in the context of when I was leading the FCC or the current FCC, making them entirely pointless. I don't care if you hail it, but you make yourself look bad when you throw insults which have nothing to do with those you're directing them at and based on faulty thinking.

Edited by Methrage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another methrage post with oh so many words and oh so little content.. What's new.

 

I never liked you guys when we were allied, your organization and structure is flawed not to mention the moralist BS that your gov used to spew on a daily basis. So excuse me for not hailing your triumphant return. I do congratulate y'all on your treaty, like I said earlier it's a match made in heaven. 

I understand that this sort of idiotic, evidence lacking, nonesense spewing trollism is par for the course here on OWF. 

 

Even so, your statement is ridiculous enough to warrant a response. 

 

If you hate our structure so much, then I suggest you continue, ya know, NOT being in the FCC. Furthermore, there are signifigant differences between the old FCC charter and the new. I wrote it from scratch this time around, balancing some of the checks to provide a more streamlined government process, in line with modern CN thinking. 

 

The FCC has gone through numerous structural changes, and to blanket condemn them all, without pointing to any single facet which you found disagreeable, is the hight of incompetence. Now please, refrain from opening your trap when the grownups are talking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...