Essenia Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 (edited) Out of boredom, I decided to check the # of alliance wars per nation for alliances over 3 million NS in the current war. There are two calculations: wars/members and wars/members in war mode. The number not in parenthesis is wars/members in war mode. nota bene: this has more to do with front assignments and how much an alliance has been targeted/deployed more than competence, so please take not of that before trying to troll FOK: 3.16 (1.68) PC: 2.9 (1.67) RnR: 1.80 (1.66) Umbrella: 1.75 (1.17) CSN: 1.17 (1.14) GOD: .47 (.202) Fark: .417 (.398) STA: 2.39 (2.06) NSO: 2.08 (1.97) NpO: 1.71 (1.48) NV: 1.09 (.761) UPN: .48 (.42) GLoF: .327 (.26) Invicta .28 (.26) Edited January 28, 2010 by Essenia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Interesting stats, good job gathering up the data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Aribeth Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Good job, but I'm surprised not to see \m/ in the list. Does that mean that they have no nations over 3M NS? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essenia Posted January 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Good job, but I'm surprised not to see \m/ in the list. Does that mean that they have no nations over 3M NS? Yeah, yeah fixed that mistype. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_GunneR_ Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Interesting but as your post says it doesn't measure competence, so it's a little irrelevant for any analysis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essenia Posted January 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Interesting but as your post says it doesn't measure competence, so it's a little irrelevant for any analysis. Analysis of what? It's certainly useful for analysis of some things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Style #386 Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Thanks for the stats. I'm assuming/hoping that this will get more tedious in the near future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essenia Posted January 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Thanks for the stats. I'm assuming/hoping that this will get more tedious in the near future. I'm hoping a certain someone *UE* who is more efficient at stat collecting may be able to get in on this; this is more of a preview than anything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalaskan Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Redux with top tier. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_GunneR_ Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Analysis of what? It's certainly useful for analysis of some things. Exactly, analysis of what? It counts wars but can't measure anything tangible. I can only see how tied up an alliance might be, but it's more telling to check traditional statistics for how an alliance fares. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owned-You Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Once the second waves arrive and bigger guns unload we'll see an increase on this ratio... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prime minister Johns Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Interesting stats, I would like to see a graph of this over the war so please keep collecting them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epik High Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Exactly, analysis of what? It counts wars but can't measure anything tangible. I can only see how tied up an alliance might be, but it's more telling to check traditional statistics for how an alliance fares. I think that's a pretty useful stat. Seeing how many warslots an alliance has left provides a clearer picture of what the situation is like on the ground, so to speak. As he said in the OP he's not looking to see how an alliance fares--stats don't necessarily have to be dick measuring contests for them to be interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 These are interesting numbers, thanks for taking them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Whoa Invicta, you had a fairly nice blitz rate last war (Karma, WWE doesn't count), what happened? :| Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poyplemonkeys Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Interesting stuff. Nemesis comes in at 1.86 (1.86) but we're a lot smaller than the alliances in the OP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratonbox Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Exactly, analysis of what? It counts wars but can't measure anything tangible. I can only see how tied up an alliance might be, but it's more telling to check traditional statistics for how an alliance fares. Analysis of war strategies, of future alliances to be declared war on. Of how many resources are on both sides of the war.. there are lots of things for which these stats help. Thanks Essenia, good work! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drai Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Interesting stuff. Nemesis comes in at 1.86 (1.86) but we're a lot smaller than the alliances in the OP. Shouldn't have an effect on wars/nation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poyplemonkeys Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Shouldn't have an effect on wars/nation. No, I was using it the opposite way, as in a smaller alliance should have more. I mean, it shouldn't be hard for alliances the size of ARES and Genesis to get pretty much complete coverage on us should they wish it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supercoolyellow Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Good job, but I'm surprised not to see \m/ in the list. Does that mean that they have no nations over 3M NS? If there is any alliance with a nation that has over 3 million NS, I would certainly like to shake that alliance's hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 I'm above the average stats, good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 I'm betting that all of the wars/members that are less than 1.00 are planning to be counterattacked, and thus haven't fully deployed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoGaiden Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 This is a link to a document i made and posted online. Shows nations and strenths. Similar to the wiki document, but this breaks down to each alliance I can see involved so far. WorldWar stats .rar file Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 If there is any alliance with a nation that has over 3 million NS, I would certainly like to shake that alliance's hand. I have 3 mil NS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Feather Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Any idea as to the more exact numbers of each side and how they're fairing? I've looked at a few of the charts, but it's hard to get the whole picture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.