Ogaden Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 No. You're asking for a knuckle sandwich. This falls into the abovementioned request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krack Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 Stats is it? No concern about war chests heading into the next war or anything like that? Unlike others (*cough* you *cough*), the SuperFriends don't sit around plotting the next war while the current one is still going on. They are a group of like-minded alliances that stick together for defensive purposes; not because they want to be big enough that they can just roll somebody without consequences the next time they get bored for 10 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raider Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 No, we're not asking for sympathy, we're asking for the Vindictive Coalition to be reasonable. The only ones being unreasonable are you and your fellows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 (edited) The only ones being unreasonable are you and your fellows. We would disagree with this hypothesis. For more information read the previous 3778 posts. Edited June 15, 2009 by James Dahl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R&R-Viking Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 (edited) THIS ISN'T ANY FUN. I'm having a blast, fwiw. No, we're not asking for sympathy, we're asking for the Vindictive Coalition to be reasonable. No. You're asking for a knuckle sandwich. Edited June 15, 2009 by Viking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azhrarn Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 (edited) We would disagree with this hypothesis. For more information read the previous 3778 posts. As you wish. Allow me to present Post #3414. Post #3747 Post #3749 And Post #3775 Edited June 15, 2009 by Azhrarn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raider Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 We would disagree with this hypothesis. For more information read the previous 3778 posts. The fact this thread was made at all in an attempt to smear Karma instead of simply accepting the terms offered shows the NPO as unreasonable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombie Glaucon Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 Alright, can someone point me to where this meme originated from? You'll have to go back to the old boards and do some searching I think. What's his name... the "NPO Law Dog"/"still a hater" guy used to say it a lot (maybe in those exact words, maybe not). Triyun as well maybe, or one of the other IOs? The one who banned me from Pacifica's boards in any case. It's been around for a very long time. In fact its use is one of the reasons I chose Polar over Pacifica when I moved from South to North back in the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minilla Island Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 Good God! This thread has been long beaten to death. Next! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 You'll have to go back to the old boards and do some searching I think. What's his name... the "NPO Law Dog"/"still a hater" guy used to say it a lot (maybe in those exact words, maybe not). Triyun as well maybe, or one of the other IOs? The one who banned me from Pacifica's boards in any case. It's been around for a very long time. In fact its use is one of the reasons I chose Polar over Pacifica when I moved from South to North back in the day. So I just realized. The South will rise again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andre27 Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 The fact this thread was made at all in an attempt to smear Karma instead of simply accepting the terms offered shows the NPO as unreasonable. Unreasonable because NPO leadership take the responsibility towards their members seriously? They've offered to pay a larger amount, but if the peace mode banks (let's assume that's what they are) are devastated a even a "reduced" amount can be beyond reach. By devastating the banks you force the deletion of large amounts of NPO nations or does karma suddenly give aid to its POW's to get out of bill lock. If you want to take a shot at the banks, give assurances you will provide funds to nations in bill lock. Make it a loan if you have to. The terms presented are plain and simple an attempt to drive long term NPO members from the game. Now drop the 90% requirement, drop the "make war on PM nations" and accept Pacifica's counter offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafael Nadal Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 You'll have to go back to the old boards and do some searching I think. What's his name... the "NPO Law Dog"/"still a hater" guy used to say it a lot (maybe in those exact words, maybe not). Triyun as well maybe, or one of the other IOs? The one who banned me from Pacifica's boards in any case. It's been around for a very long time. In fact its use is one of the reasons I chose Polar over Pacifica when I moved from South to North back in the day. Josef Thorne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shodemofi-NPO Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 No, we're not asking for sympathy, we're asking for the Vindictive Coalition to be reasonable. Funny, seems like if that were the case you'd have just said that to them on IRC. Now you'll talk about how they said they wouldn't change the terms on IRC. Well, if that's the case, what's your goal in posting it here? Pity points and an attempted PR smear against Karma to try and force them to change the terms that way? Sure seems like it. So please, tell me what the point of this thread is if not pity points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R&R-Viking Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 Funny, seems like if that were the case you'd have just said that to them on IRC. Now you'll talk about how they said they wouldn't change the terms on IRC. Well, if that's the case, what's your goal in posting it here? Pity points and an attempted PR smear against Karma to try and force them to change the terms that way? Sure seems like it. So please, tell me what the point of this thread is if not pity points. It can only be for PR, which in itself is hilarious because the vast majority of people who are reading these threads are bombing the hell out of them at the moment. I know I'm not swayed, are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 You'll have to go back to the old boards and do some searching I think. What's his name... the "NPO Law Dog"/"still a hater" guy used to say it a lot (maybe in those exact words, maybe not). Triyun as well maybe, or one of the other IOs? The one who banned me from Pacifica's boards in any case. It's been around for a very long time. In fact its use is one of the reasons I chose Polar over Pacifica when I moved from South to North back in the day. The meme seems to have far outlived the opinion it was referencing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andre27 Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 Funny, seems like if that were the case you'd have just said that to them on IRC. Now you'll talk about how they said they wouldn't change the terms on IRC. Well, if that's the case, what's your goal in posting it here? Pity points and an attempted PR smear against Karma to try and force them to change the terms that way? Sure seems like it. So please, tell me what the point of this thread is if not pity points. I'm pretty sure it has been said on IRC, but at times IRC works counterproductive. Personally i find it hard to imagine that the majority of Karma coalition nations think highly of these peace terms for Pacifica. Sadly enough only the people with axes to grind blabber all over this topic. It's time for the negotiators to actually listen to their members and grant white peace to Pacifica instead of following up with this farce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 Unreasonable because NPO leadership take the responsibility towards their members seriously?They've offered to pay a larger amount, but if the peace mode banks (let's assume that's what they are) are devastated a even a "reduced" amount can be beyond reach. By devastating the banks you force the deletion of large amounts of NPO nations or does karma suddenly give aid to its POW's to get out of bill lock. If you want to take a shot at the banks, give assurances you will provide funds to nations in bill lock. Make it a loan if you have to. The terms presented are plain and simple an attempt to drive long term NPO members from the game. Now drop the 90% requirement, drop the "make war on PM nations" and accept Pacifica's counter offer. Or how about you guys keep fighting for your allies instead of bailing out like some real allies such as TPF are still doing? Too much of a task eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azhrarn Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 Personally i find it hard to imagine that the majority of Karma coalition nations think highly of these peace terms for Pacifica. You're right, there are many that disagree with these terms because they believe they're too lenient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krack Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 I'm pretty sure it has been said on IRC, but at times IRC works counterproductive.Personally i find it hard to imagine that the majority of Karma coalition nations think highly of these peace terms for Pacifica. Sadly enough only the people with axes to grind blabber all over this topic. It's time for the negotiators to actually listen to their members and grant white peace to Pacifica instead of following up with this farce. I'll admit, it is quite an accomplishment to make the funniest post in a 190 page thread - congratulations good sir. You win one cookie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 It's time for the negotiators to actually listen to their members and grant white peace to Pacifica instead of following up with this farce. Contrary to popular belief, the alliances fighting NPO aren't made up of nations that fought for the Hegemony side of this war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Michaels Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 I'm pretty sure it has been said on IRC, but at times IRC works counterproductive.Personally i find it hard to imagine that the majority of Karma coalition nations think highly of these peace terms for Pacifica. Sadly enough only the people with axes to grind blabber all over this topic. It's time for the negotiators to actually listen to their members and grant white peace to Pacifica instead of following up with this farce. Just like the ones you gave VE during the Green Civil War, right? Shove off, sycophant, and let those with spines discuss this matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andre27 Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 (edited) Or how about you guys keep fighting for your allies instead of bailing out like some real allies such as TPF are still doing? Too much of a task eh? How about actually addressing the post you quoted instead. Just like the ones you gave VE during the Green Civil War, right? Shove off, sycophant, and let those with spines discuss this matter. That leaves you out of it doesn't it. Edited June 15, 2009 by andre27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 (edited) Contrary to popular belief, the alliances fighting NPO aren't made up of nations that fought for the Hegemony side of this war. Well, in reality there are a small group of alliances (well I guess 18 isn't that small) actually fighting us, and a massive horde who seem to think that they are. It's rather strange. Edited June 15, 2009 by James Dahl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willaim Kreiger Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 The meme seems to have far outlived the opinion it was referencing. I don't really see what you're arguing here. "Do something about it." meant the same thing three years ago as it does today. As in, if you disagree with how we run ourselves and this place, make us change the way we play. It's not their fault that they called you on it, eventually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R&R-Viking Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 I'm pretty sure it has been said on IRC, but at times IRC works counterproductive.Personally i find it hard to imagine that the majority of Karma coalition nations think highly of these peace terms for Pacifica. Sadly enough only the people with axes to grind blabber all over this topic. It's time for the negotiators to actually listen to their members and grant white peace to Pacifica instead of following up with this farce. I'm glad we finally have an expert on what thousands of people are thinking right now. To be completely honest, I'd have to say a majority of "Karma" endorse these terms. Feel free to live in a fantasy land of sugar gum drop streets and lollipop dreams, though. White peace, that's hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts