Vhalen Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Neat to see these numbers all together like this, I suppose. Not sure I'd want to see it all enacted, though. I'm not a huge fan of massive aid reps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted May 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 For the record, the MHA did not collect any reparations during the NoCB war. Just thought I'd throw that out there. I never said anyone had to collect reparations. I'm just stating my personal opinions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookavich Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 (edited) Geez, cookavich... what did you hit your head on? Nice deflection though.Your mom :/Also, thanks. Seriously, it is pretty cut and dry what I was trying to get across. Making the Hegemony pay for reps they received during the SPW is a hypocritical action. What's your problem, again? edit: gah Edited May 6, 2009 by cookavich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Karma's overconfidence will lead to its destruction. I see the NPO's taking a page from the Karl Rove playbook. Take your greatest weakest and pin it on the enemy. Your mom :/Also, thanks. Seriously, it is pretty cut and dry what I was trying to get across. Making the Hegemony pay for reps they received during the SPW is a hypocritical action. What's your problem, again? I know that's what you were trying to get at... oops.. I mean across, I know what you were trying to get across, my apologies. But it seemed like you were trying to pin that hypocrisy on me, which I clarified and then you posted some nonsense. I would imagine that our positions are actually quite similar, and there's really no need for any of this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookavich Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I know that's what you were trying to get at... oops.. I mean across, I know what you were trying to get across, my apologies. But it seemed like you were trying to pin that hypocrisy on me, which I clarified and then you posted some nonsense. I would imagine that our positions are actually quite similar, and there's really no need for any of this.Those words are actually synonyms. It doesn't change the meaning of what I said :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted May 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 OK everything is finished on my part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted May 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Karma's overconfidence will lead to its destruction.The war just started. If you really think those reps are bad. Wait til someone who can't stand you does reps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brass Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Karma's overconfidence will lead to its destruction.The war just started. I don't know about overconfidence, but the peace term arguments alone will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venizelos Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 i believe MHA did get some reps, and so did IRON, but only fractions of what was originally agreed upon. anyways, i don't think we'll see any reps asked in the form of money, it takes way too long and its too insignificant for any nations that actually mattered in the war (ie nations over 5k infra). infra costs way too much for any foreign aid money to make a difference in large nations' growth. sending money aid makes sense to nations under 3k infra, which can be handled internally from the alliances themselves. alliances want tech, they can aid their small members on their own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theArrowheadian Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Karma's overconfidence will lead to its destruction.The war just started. I think this is what I've been saying about NPO for about a year and a half now. Ironic, isn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Falkner Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Since we're on the topic of reps from past wars and how they should influence reps in this war, I would like to note that pretty much everyone from MCXA that has accepted reps in previous wars is now in alliances fighting on the side of Karma. So if profits from being on the side of NPO are a primary factor in deciding on reps for this war, the MCXA should owe very little. Actually, if I remember correctly, people who fought in Karma actually owe us reps still, so really, when this war is over, you guys should be paying us stuff. Just saying.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellisus Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Since we're on the topic of reps from past wars and how they should influence reps in this war, I would like to note that pretty much everyone from MCXA that has accepted reps in previous wars is now in alliances fighting on the side of Karma. So if profits from being on the side of NPO are a primary factor in deciding on reps for this war, the MCXA should owe very little. Actually, if I remember correctly, people who fought in Karma actually owe us reps still, so really, when this war is over, you guys should be paying us stuff. Just saying.... Nice joke, I guess. To Sal Paradise and cookavich: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smacky Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 It wouldn't be "karma" if the reps were limited to damage from this war alone. Where's the forced disbandments, treaty cancellations, viceroys, wonder deletions, government purges and secret terms? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stylesjl Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Karma's overconfidence will lead to its destruction.The war just started. I agree, just look at the triumphant winning of the NPO. At the rate you guys are losing strength you will have beat Karma in the race to the bottom! Pacifica Prevails! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilzey Land Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Karma's overconfidence will lead to its destruction.The war just started. I'm off to the hospital, I just choked on my breakfast whilst laughing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 (edited) -nvm- Edited May 6, 2009 by shahenshah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxNation Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 first of all, no I myself have lost at least 200 tech between nukes and what i win on ground battles. So I'm owed 50% of our total? This is no way makes up for our true losses. I already rebought some infra to stay fighting at the same level, where is the cost for that. Also many of us went in on treaties, who owes all of this? NPO alone? What of TORN? While they may have made the right decisions, NPO and TORN did start this together, NPO wouldn't have gone it alone in the beginning. You could never calculate the true cost and if you did it would be rediculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 how are you gonna estimate the reps for vox. I wonder if we get compensation for the ~200 or so members they've driven from our ranks... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted May 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 (edited) I wonder if we get compensation for the ~200 or so members they've driven from our ranks... I personally do not think you should get compensation for past actions. Those so called members that where driven from your alliance, left. It was a choice. Edited May 6, 2009 by Tick1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Reparations have not been enough to cover actual damages for a long time. When a single nuke does upwards of $200m then the costs are just ridiculous. I wonder if the total damage this war is over $1 trillion yet ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gruthenia Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I heard from a reputable source this war was a tech raid, no amount of reparations could be too much for me nom nom nom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Electron Sponge Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I heard from a reputable source this war was a tech raid, no amount of reparations could be too much for me nom nom nom I've gained almost 100 tech from NPO, most of it had "MADE IN THE MUSHROOM KINGDOM" written on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmacis Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 (edited) I wonder if the total damage this war is over $1 trillion yet ... I think the damage of the pre-war top 5% alone is way over $1 trillion. Edited May 6, 2009 by Salmacis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canehda Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I agree, just look at the triumphant winning of the NPO. At the rate you guys are losing strength you will have beat Karma in the race to the bottom! Pacifica Prevails! o/ NPO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJ Scott Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I want $200 in reps. Paid into 200 different slots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.