sir jesus Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 Message to ComIntern from the Melvin Republic: It is most unfortunate that you have decided to turn down this proposal. Many of you cite the lack of diplomatic relations, but what is not understood is that my state is closely tied to those of ComIntern. In fact, if you go to war I feel it almost certain that Dragon Bloc would be there to support you. However, I understand the need to hold on to foreign lands. Diplomatic growth requires a first step, hopefully the Melvin Republic will be in a position to grant you a favor in the future so that we may begin walking this path. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 (edited) Hand the Melvin Republic former Xizang Yes - 3 vote(s) No - 6 vote(s) Undecided - 1 vote(s) To vote: Atlantis, Eritrea With 50% voting "No", Melvin Republic will not receive Xizang. Message to ComIntern from the Melvin Republic: It is most unfortunate that you have decided to turn down this proposal. Many of you cite the lack of diplomatic relations, but what is not understood is that my state is closely tied to those of ComIntern. In fact, if you go to war I feel it almost certain that Dragon Bloc would be there to support you. However, I understand the need to hold on to foreign lands. Diplomatic growth requires a first step, hopefully the Melvin Republic will be in a position to grant you a favor in the future so that we may begin walking this path. Reply to the Melvin Republic from Canada For Canada, it is not the lack of relations with your nation, it is the fact that Xizang was a friend of ours and we wish for the people to govern themselves, not coming under the rule of others. Simply said, we want the people to form their own nation, eventually. Edited May 26, 2009 by Lynneth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 With Canadian and NRP-soldiers going into Alaska, it now is officially a ComIntern protectorate, unless someone wishes to object. Are there objections? Note: Manchukuo's signature will be turned into that of the Northeast People's Republic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V The King Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Viniland requests a join protectorate of Alaska with Canada. Quite honestly, although the People's Republic is party of the ComiTerm with Canada, we're unsure why it took immediate action to secure the area given it's far away from their homeland and they never had any relations with USNA. Still, we're solely interested on the stability of the area and hope that the whole of it ends in good hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Since... Aisin Guido has deceased new signatures will be neccesary: For the Northeast People's Republic, The Prime Minster ******** Chekov The Premier Wen Jiabao The Seal of the Northeast People's Republic, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) Viniland requests a join protectorate of Alaska with Canada. Quite honestly, although the People's Republic is party of the ComiTerm with Canada, we're unsure why it took immediate action to secure the area given it's far away from their homeland and they never had any relations with USNA.Still, we're solely interested on the stability of the area and hope that the whole of it ends in good hands. Canada would approve of Viniland taking part in the protectorate. Regarding why NRP-soldiers moved in: They simply were nearby, on an exercise and when they got the note of Canadian men moving, they got there first, that is all. Since... Aisin Guido has deceased new signatures will be neccesary: Added. Edited May 28, 2009 by Lynneth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 As per this message: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=1564656 the Protectorate is a north-american one, no ComIntern-only. (We do not wish to provoke Tahoe unnecessarily.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 "We have no interest in protecting the Alaskan regions, Vinland or Tahoe has our full support along with any other American nation." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 "We wonder if we can vote to suspend Northeast People's Republic from the Comintern for the uneeded war in Antarctica or at least make them remove all troops from Helzan and pay reparations." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) "We wonder if we can vote to suspend Northeast People's Republic from the Comintern for the uneeded war in Antarctica or at least make them remove all troops from Helzan and pay reparations." From what we know, the NPR already withdrew all their forces. And they hardly did any damage at all according to our intel, though that may of course be wrong. Edited May 28, 2009 by Lynneth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 "Under very suspicious circumstances, we think they should pay reparations for the blown barracks." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 "Under very suspicious circumstances, we think they should pay reparations for the blown barracks." While we do not feel this to be strictly necessary, it would at least serve to calm Helzan and others. Thus, we agree that the NPR should pay these reparations. Also, we propose that the optional Aggression-part of the treaty be struck from it. This would turn the ComIntern into a purely defensive pact, the only "aggressive" actions we would need to take being the honouring of the Amendment. It would serve to shut the Nordic idiocy of ComIntern "warmongering" up and calm the world. Yes - 1 vote(s) No - 0 vote(s) Undecided - 0 vote(s) To vote: Osea, Yuktobania, Cainette, Alvonia, New England, Vaule, Dragonisia, Annihilation, NPR, Atlantis, Eritrea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 We vote Yes on the admendment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 "Yes to the amendment." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 We are undecided on this matter. OOC: So we are voting to scrap the oA part, minus the Amendment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynneth Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 We are undecided on this matter.OOC: So we are voting to scrap the oA part, minus the Amendment OOC: Exactly. optional Aggression goes, and we only take action in one of the following cases: 1) A ComIntern member is attacked. 2) A nation on the world is attacked without a legit/valid Casus Belli. IC: Scrap optional Aggression Yes - 3 vote(s) No - 0 vote(s) Undecided - 1 vote(s) To vote: Yuktobania, New England, Vaule, Dragonisia, Annihilation, NPR, Atlantis, Eritrea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 OOC: Exactly. optional Aggression goes, and we only take action in one of the following cases: 1) A ComIntern member is attacked. 2) A nation on the world is attacked without a legit/valid Casus Belli. IC: Scrap optional Aggression Yes - 3 vote(s) No - 0 vote(s) Undecided - 1 vote(s) To vote: Yuktobania, New England, Vaule, Dragonisia, Annihilation, NPR, Atlantis, Eritrea OOC: Gotcha IC: We change our vote to Aye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razgriz 2K9 Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 We vote Yes, just to shut up the Nordic critics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 "And those Helzan's too, we just lost all respect for Helza and Lady Valerie, we will be placing economic sanctions against them if everyone else is ok with it." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sumeragi Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 (edited) We would like to notify the Comintern that, in line with our new waters policy, all military ships are not allowed to enter any of our waters. Thank you for your attention. Edited May 28, 2009 by Sumeragi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imperator Azenquor Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Vaule's Rep returns to the ComIntern. Vaule votes Yea on the proposal to remove the Optional Aggression clause, and is glad to see that the ComIntern has taken the example of the Treize Doctrine. Vaule would also like to table a motion for the ComIntern to consider a normalization of Diplomatic ties with the Greater Nordic Reich and the members of the Nordic Coalition. We stress the importance of communication and diplomacy even among countries with ideological and political differences. It is with this in mind that we ask members of the ComIntern to vote on this motion. We have already taken the first step and normalized diplomatic ties with the GNR, and we hope that other members of the ComIntern shall do the same. (This is technically a non-binding motion as the ComIntern doesn't have the authority to control a nation's Foreign Affairs or mandate diplomatic ties) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 "As to Vaule's motion, we say no- we say no because, they have done nothing to help our relationship, after the brisbane conference they have done nothing to follow the treaty, they always try spin lies to make us the agressors and unless they manup to their mistakes, we shall vote no." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 We also must vote no. We can never forgive them for killing an entire generation of our men. We defended that rock to the best we could and we paid for it in blood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 no to Vaule; yes to amendment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 OOC: Exactly. optional Aggression goes, and we only take action in one of the following cases: 1) A ComIntern member is attacked. 2) A nation on the world is attacked without a legit/valid Casus Belli. IC: Scrap optional Aggression Yes - 3 vote(s) No - 0 vote(s) Undecided - 1 vote(s) To vote: Yuktobania, New England, Vaule, Dragonisia, Annihilation, NPR, Atlantis, Eritrea New England votes Yes on this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.