Zoot Zoot Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 And I saw F-22 in your military list yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padraig Rua Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 I already know about the Tech in CNRP. I was just asking if it was in the list. It was a small error, now fixed. Anyway to get back to the original question, what do you think of the organization of the Alaskan Armies? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Well done EM, that last post in "This is not a Drill" well written. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 [quote name='Maelstrom Vortex' timestamp='1294372648' post='2566763'] Well done EM, that last post in "This is not a Drill" well written. [/quote] I'm glad SOMEONE enjoyed the suffering and devastation wrought on the innocent little Nodic babies with that attack. [sub]Ty. And not californian.[/sub] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 (edited) *Points at the patheticness of this thread and laughs with great hilarity.* http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=96761&view=findpost&p=2566708 1. You wish physics works in some of the ways you have described. 2. Taking 4 nukes would devastate any nation and the assumption of losses only in the hundreds of thousands in cities that might contain millions is fairly absurd. 3. Assuming a nation has set firing mechanisms to go off too deep based on geography is even more.. well.. I can't think of any other word than sad. I'm sorry, all I am seeing is an attempt to mitigate the damage via meta-ing out the effects of the weapons and making broad sweeping assumptions about how and where the nukes went off and on what. You do not have control over this. IG you would have suffered extremely significant damage. In RL you would have suffered extremely significant damage. I will respect you far more as an RPer if you properly RP the tragedy that has affected your nation instead of attempting to belittle the unparalleled destructive capability of a nuclear device. It is also an insult to Japan and all survivors of nuclear weapons either in use, testing, or development. [quote name='Executive Minister' timestamp='1294373827' post='2566777'] I'm glad SOMEONE enjoyed the suffering and devastation wrought on the innocent little Nodic babies with that attack. [sub]Ty. And not californian.[/sub] [/quote] Not only enjoying, benefiting from. Remember, I'm playing a Bane in the WoD thread that parallels CNRP. I fully encourage the destruction of Gaia in all her forms. Edited January 7, 2011 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 [quote name='Maelstrom Vortex' timestamp='1294374928' post='2566798'] Not only enjoying, benefiting from. Remember, I'm playing a Bane in the WoD thread that parallels CNRP. I fully encourage the destruction of Gaia in all her forms. [/quote] I don't know what you mean, but I'm flattered? Also, I'm saying this here. I cannot do diddly with regards to anything that has to do with Ty's Lollercoaster antics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shatner Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 IRC says I have to have a registered nick to join the cnrp channel. Can anyone shed some light on this problem? I don't know much about the mechanics of IRC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 [i]/msg nickserv register PASSWORD EMAIL [/i]Essentially, get on "Shatner" and type that above. Replace password and email with your preferred password and email address. Once it's confirmed, type: /ns identify PASSWORD And then join #cnrp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shatner Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 [quote name='Sargun' timestamp='1294375594' post='2566813'] [i]/msg nickserv register PASSWORD EMAIL [/i]Essentially, get on "Shatner" and type that above. Replace password and email with your preferred password and email address. Once it's confirmed, type: /ns identify PASSWORD And then join #cnrp. [/quote] Thanks. It's weird, I've never had to do this before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 (edited) There's been a problem with fools joining, spamming, leaving, etc. Edited January 7, 2011 by Sargun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lestari Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Speaking of #CNRP, mind unbanning me? It's been a few weeks, and I have to discuss somethings with a few RPers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 It has not been anywhere near a few weeks, it's been four days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lestari Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 [quote name='Sargun' timestamp='1294376099' post='2566825'] It has not been anywhere near a few weeks, it's been four days. [/quote] O_o Time passes quickly. The point remains I need to talk something over with some RPers. It's not like I was banned for any reason this time. Except for talking back to Saarkin, who was kicking me immediately every time I joined. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 You haven't been banned for a while now. :3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lestari Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 [quote name='Sargun' timestamp='1294376436' post='2566828'] You haven't been banned for a while now. :3 [/quote] I get banned every month O_o And I seriously need to talk to a few RPers about something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 [quote name='dotCom' timestamp='1294376499' post='2566829'] I get banned every month O_o And I seriously need to talk to a few RPers about something. [/quote] Protip: if you typed /join #cnrp you'd be in #cnrp but don't let that stop you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 [quote name='dotCom' timestamp='1294376499' post='2566829'] I get banned every month O_o And I seriously need to talk to a few RPers about something. [/quote] You don't need to be in CNRP to talk to RPers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lestari Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 [quote name='Sal Paradise' timestamp='1294383080' post='2567008'] You don't need to be in CNRP to talk to RPers. [/quote] No, but it makes it damn easier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iKrolm Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Maelstrom Vortex' timestamp='1294374928' post='2566798'] *Points at the patheticness of this thread and laughs with great hilarity.* http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=96761&view=findpost&p=2566708 [b]1. You wish physics works in some of the ways you have described.[/b] 2. Taking 4 nukes would devastate any nation and the assumption of losses only in the hundreds of thousands in cities that might contain millions is fairly absurd. 3. Assuming a nation has set firing mechanisms to go off too deep based on geography is even more.. well.. I can't think of any other word than sad. [/quote] This. SDI rolls were made, time to properly RP the damage. Edited January 7, 2011 by iKrolm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 Brought this into the OOC thread... [quote name='dotCom' timestamp='1294795026' post='2572465'] OOC: What would Dalmatia's IC reason be for using ludicrously flimsy evidence to occupy a country half a world away? [/quote] Ask him as I am not Malatose. But imperialism is, by all accounts, a legitimate [i]casus belli[/i]. Whatever it may be, that's up to Dalmatia's IC reasoning, not my own justification. I was just clearing up the fact that real life wars have been fought over very flimsily-based false flag operations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 Triyun, you don't actually believe that the PRC is the same state as the RoC do you? That was just your retarded minister talking, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 Yes I do Sal: http://books.google.com/books?id=74Zmct-7hGIC&pg=PA364&lpg=PA364&dq=continuation+of+the+state+treaties&source=bl&ots=h0vdgTCv9U&sig=X-B3wKjp-TUgw_SpK87osgevHEE&hl=en&ei=XSUtTZiKKYH48AasxoHwCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=continuation%20of%20the%20state%20treaties&f=false Yes the People's Republic of China is broadly recognized as a continuation of the previous state, which was the Republic of China and prior to that the Qing Empire. The People's Republic of China was granted the Republic of China's seat on the UN Security Council. It was given back Hong Kong after a 99 year lease signed between the United Kingdom and the Qing Dynasty. It is the successor state of China and retains the treaties of the previous states unless it specifically renounces them. If you believe that the People's Republic of China should have the permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council and if you believe that it regaining Hong Kong was legitimate, than you believe that it is the successor state. It is fact. Now granted I'll admit that its a grey area in international law just how much this normally applies, but looking over recent history it does in fact seem to apply especially in the Chinese case and one could make a case as such. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generalissimo Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 This might seem silly, but how does one access of #CNRP? I've always done my CNRPing on these forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 [quote name='Triyun' timestamp='1294805264' post='2572681'] Yes I do Sal: http://books.google.com/books?id=74Zmct-7hGIC&pg=PA364&lpg=PA364&dq=continuation+of+the+state+treaties&source=bl&ots=h0vdgTCv9U&sig=X-B3wKjp-TUgw_SpK87osgevHEE&hl=en&ei=XSUtTZiKKYH48AasxoHwCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=continuation%20of%20the%20state%20treaties&f=false Yes the People's Republic of China is broadly recognized as a continuation of the previous state, which was the Republic of China and prior to that the Qing Empire. The People's Republic of China was granted the Republic of China's seat on the UN Security Council. It was given back Hong Kong after a 99 year lease signed between the United Kingdom and the Qing Dynasty. It is the successor state of China and retains the treaties of the previous states unless it specifically renounces them. If you believe that the People's Republic of China should have the permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council and if you believe that it regaining Hong Kong was legitimate, than you believe that it is the successor state. It is fact. Now granted I'll admit that its a grey area in international law just how much this normally applies, but looking over recent history it does in fact seem to apply especially in the Chinese case and one could make a case as such. [/quote] The Republic of China still exists. And no I don't believe the PRC should have a permanent seat on the UN Security Council and that Hong Kong should have been given to it. If I did support the PRC's seat on the security council it certainly wouldn't be because the RoC had one. But which is it? The same state or the successor state? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AironthFlamewing Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 http://01.chat.mibbit.com/ IRC: Set this to Coldfront Nickname: whatever you wish Channel: #CNRP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.