cookavich

This is an OOC forum and you're the one who used a sexual orientation as an insult. And we're back to the bottom of the mountain again.

once again, our side hasn't adopted a position that would make it hypocritical to purposely (and hilariously) avoid attacking an ally of ng in conclusion, your dumb

Sometimes I think to myself "Alterego's posting can't get any worse," but then I read your next post and I'm proven wrong once again. It's like the CN version of the myth of Sisyphus.

please let this be true and i will love you forever

a little pitchy tbqh

shots fired shots fired

heil der reich

I'm sure that provides cold comfort to your side's upper tier.

While we do run a whorehouse, you're perhaps the only poster who would unironically accuse TOP of being emasculated.

I'm sure if you say it enough times it will be true.

The inconsistency I just pointed out to you with regards to TLR and MK. Should I bring out the crayons and draw you a more vivid picture or should I just skip right to writing up a blog post? How is that hypocrisy, Schatt? Of course we didn't attack NPO or IRON, but we also weren't the ones who made that absolutely ridiculous claim that "an attack on one is an attack on all" and then went ahead and ignored it wherever convenient. There's no hypocrisy in that. There is, however, blatant hypocrisy in the actions of the Toilet Bowl 2.0 Coalition. Here's a better mantra to post in the next thread where this comes up: "an attack on one is an attack on all when convenient." Doesn't quite have the same ring to it that the other one has but at least it's accurate.

That isn't the issue most people are bringing up. The issue is that the whole overplayed "an attack on one is an attack on all" hasn't been applied with any sort of consistency. TLR gets countered by 22 idiots "lol, welp that wasn't supposed to happen"... MK attacks Ai "welp I guess they get a pass since they're allied to NG lets just edit that DoW and hope no one noticed." edit: and yes the old hedgemony was downright evil when it came to landscaping

There would be nothing I'd love to see more than for the mighty Alexandros o Megas to go head to head against Owabie and TB. Alas, it is not to be.

I'm just going to assume you mean the most despicably handsome friends.

[quote name='Brehon' timestamp='1358876283' post='3083794'] Really everyone (both sides) cut the !@#$. We all know if IRON or NPO are hit, NG will counter. We know if MK is hit NG will counter. Stop acting stupid just so you can play some great argument or strategy out here. We all know why Umbrella was hit. We all know why AI and NATO were the ones countered and we all know why the declarations didn't include MK. Good lord I go to sleep for one night and you all start acting like something changed. You wanted war. We wanted war leave the drivel at home. [/quote]actually brehon we all know that everyone has avoided declaring on us because we are after all CN's Godliest Military Empire[color=#000000][font=Arial, sans-serif][size=3]™[/size][/font][/color]

All these bad Judge X posts are making it really hard to distinguish one thread from another.

I would say that the incompetence displayed by the DoW is surprising but then I looked at the alliances whose signatures are attached to it.

[quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1358783982' post='3082328'] You do realize Doomhouse is a MDoAP not a MADP right? [/quote]Have you ever heard of the MADP treaty bloc CnG? I've heard they've been around for a few years.

For those of you endlessly repeating the "attack on one is an attack on all" trope, you do realize how MADPs work, right?

[quote name='Charles Stuart' timestamp='1358746871' post='3081786'] It pulls in any ally of the alliances that attacked umbrella. An attack on one is an attack on all. [/quote]so then CnG is now at war with NPO? great job at coalition warfaring there, equilibrium.

[quote name='The Warrior' timestamp='1358746107' post='3081688'] Nope you didn't. [/quote]then by the transitive properties of cybernations the npo is at war with three of their allies

shots fired shots fired

[quote name='MadScotII' timestamp='1358704282' post='3081044'] Does Umbrella have no allies with nations at 9K or around about that number. Or did you not think that might be what he meant. Silly, silly. [/quote]what is this 2008?

[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1357280508' post='3071168'] Another MK member using their usual MK opinion is now objective truth argument. Your post is an actually !@#$%* post. [/quote]Would you go so far as to say that user Sandwich Controversy is what you would call typical MK?

[quote name='Judge X' timestamp='1357181475' post='3070748'] I guess this has to still be going on. Well, nobody kicked in the door so I guess it's pretty much set. Nothing is gonna happen. [/quote]This thread just. Will. Not. Die.