Gh0s7
-
Posts
300 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Blog Comments posted by Gh0s7
-
-
Back during the TSO-Minc war, Kashmir, and mainly Margave, were the main reasons peace talks happened. Margave was constantly working in the back channels and in our queries to try and make peace happen. Now I look at the war and I see Minc attacking Kashmir, and my initial impression is that you guys took Kashmir for granted.
I am not a government member at this time. What I am, is a fairly irritated member who saw a logdump in our treaty topic that had nothing to do with the war or Hitchcock. Whether he accepts that or not is not my problem, but it is reality.
I can't pretend to know how accurate what you say is, but I root for my friends in Kashmir all the same.
-
Margave said that because you decided to do a logdump on our treaty topic. Margave did not bait us, YOU did. Now you have our attention. If you want to do a logdump, make your own damn topic, don't post it in a treaty thread like an ass.
I will admit I know next to nothing about the Dream war and the brown senate vote crap. What I do know is the war prior to that, and I assumed that this was interconnected. If I was wrong, then I'll yield there, but you have done yourself no favors in pissing off multiple alliances for no reason other than your own boredom.
Edit: Grammar
-
1.) Margave was literally the one trying to get you peace after you screwed up and hit TSO because you didn't get what you want.
2.) That is not a high horse. You don't have a high horse by doing something immoral. That is literally the complete opposite of what the term actually means.
3.) We were not coming in, nor do we neccessarily plan to. With that having been said, the fact that you admitted to trying to bait DK in shows your sheer level of stupidity. You want to be a victim, and you want to be a martyr. You willfully admitted to acting idiotically in order to get an additional alliance to fight you. So again, you have no moral high ground to cling to.
The difference between us is I don't try and act as if I have the moral highground. I do what I do, morality be damned. You on the other hand, can't make up your mind how the hell you want to act.
-
well sigrun- let's bag it up and wait for a no CB invicta dogpile- because that's the moral high ground
This is the exactreason you have literally 0 support. Once again you try to pick a fight. How well did that go when you tried to derail our treaty topic?
We don't need a CB to roll you. Nor do we even need to put forth much effort, because your idiocy is so very efficient at biting off more than you can chew.
-
There is no propaganda war, it's certain people on your side pissing off entire alliances, and then them and their allies choosing your opposition, and then their allies allies doing the same, and so on. No one supports you because your side has pissed off half the large alliances in the game. There is no conspiracy. There is no plan to ruin your credibility. There is simply your side with it's inability to play the political game in a manner that does not create boat loads of enemies, and when it happens, you guys playing the victim card talking about how you didn't deserve it.
-
They don't have to worry about getting hit while you continue to comit yourselves against NS that will be replaced with a single slot of aid. Additionally, you don't get to build past 10k NS or you'll just get knocked right back down again and lose cash all over again.
But yes, you have nothing to lose, so keep this perma war going. They get to keep building for the most part while you're eternally stuck at ankle biter range to never be able to actually do anything.
Meanwhile you keep poking other people trying to goad them either into a fight or to get them to help your opposition.
-
History will not remember this war, only LN and MI will. Additionally, your side has lost. You're hiding at the sub 10k NS range occasionally doing damage and then promoting about how badass you guys are because you're out damaging them. Meanwhile, rebuild will be next to impossible. You guys have lost. The only reason you can claim you've "won" is because now they can't touch your nations. That's not winning. And if you really want to fight an eternal war with them, when you can't even hit the majority of their nations, you're just going to be laughed off like the joke you are.
-
Well this is one of dozens of good reasons not to.
BMT - you are wrong. Just cause you don't understand war doesnt mean we dont.
Various wars have various methods of going about it. Simply because he doesn't meet what you believe to be acceptable criteria for this one does not mean he is incapable of understanding war in general. That said, this is just your side throwing a tantrum about wording at this point, and being unable to accept reality.
-
(Person) I am aware..But i think we need to sound to new that they are also in dbdc's sniper scope..14 hrs · Like
That would be why I see you as attempting to manipulate them. As for the rest, I can't verify or refute that, but that seems exceptionally convenient given the circumstances.
-
That still doesn't change the fact you intended to isolate your own ally to hit your NAP partner.
Hell, hitting the NAP partner would be reasonable, in that scenario.
But attempting to manipulate your own ally and force them to isolate themselves, rather than just explain the situation straight up? That's just sad/pathetic
-
(Smurf) What do you think of putting SP&TRs entire upper tier on the NEW AA? I don’t think DBDC will attack until they rebuild from the WTF war so we have like 3 months… and they won't attack NEW because of the FTW (FEAR/WP merged) treaty..15 hrs · Like(Person) I am aware..But i think we need to sound to new that they are also in dbdc's sniper scope..14 hrs · Like(Smurf) III%, FAN and NEW probably ..maybe could get the others DBDC has raided. We would need FTW to come with NEW.12 hrs · Like(Person) They can be beat. Hitting them with WTF, NEW, SPATR, KASKUS, etc... they couldn't hold up.1 hr · Like(Person) They would have allies join. Its never one.1 hr · Like(Smurf) With FEAR we'd mathematically have the advantagem56 mins · Like(Person) And we are friends with FEAR and so is NEW so they won't attack.
-
Okay, so clearly you're retarded, Smurf, so let me break down the statistics for you.830,484.25 dealt by DS vs 531,059.67 dealt by InvictaDS 877,005.84 overall damage taken vs 1,916,867.18 dealt482,370.73 taken by Kaskus vs 662,738.92 dealt by KaskusSo we took double the damage, but tripled the damage dealt.Clearly Kaskus needs to put a tighter leash on you so you can stop emberassing them, especially considering you actively plotting to isolate your own allies(NEW) to attack a NAP partner(DBDC)Ontop of the fact that the only war that made sense was the one that occured, unless we intended to just sit by and let a war not happen this year, which would be absurd. It wasn't DBDC's political clout that made the war possible, it was our position in the treaty web ontop of the usual war boner.Try harder son.In regards to whether or not we are a vassal state of DBDC, I've heard it before, go cheer lead for Polar.
-
Doom Squad: Touch us and we ll tell DBDC
Because we needed DBDC during the last global war.
Oh wait, that's right, we didn't.
-
Ain't nobody else like you, Kash. Just keep on rolling.
o/
-
At least I died killing Tywin... D:
-
Lolwut? And why should they target us, Shepard?
-
Hey Dragonshy.
The ever bitter Dre4m War- part 2
in From the desk of Lucius Optimus
A blog by Lucius Optimus in General
Posted
It wont last years, at most, it will last months, when the very last of your money dries up, and you ragequit because you refused to surrender and couldn't continue fighting without any cash reserves.