Jump to content

hapapants

Members
  • Posts

    105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About hapapants

  • Birthday 06/02/1990

Profile Information

  • Location
    Pittsburgh
  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    KaLae
  • Alliance Name
    Doom Squad

hapapants's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. ITT: people that disapprove of DBDC's past behavior continue to disapprove of their actions.
  2. Thanks for sharing Shatt, and congrats on 8 years. It's always cool to see someone's history with the game. And it's always fun to see a mention of the Browncoats from time to time.
  3. How funny do you find it? Does it merely tickle you pink? Or perhaps it has resulted in a full-bellied laugh? It is important for me to know these things, as I will consult your humor in the future before I make decisions for my alliance. You are misinterpreting what "wrong" means in the context of kingzog's argument. He isn't arguing that WTF is "morally" wrong, or that DBDC isn't hypocritical - those are arguments are a waste of time and the rest of you are free to melt your brains over such things. What he's arguing is that WTF worsened their political position by unnecessarily by accepting CT into their alliance. And I don't understand why it is a waste of time to independently analyze the merits of such decisions. So for illustrative purposes, do you think that DBDC's actions amount to "bad" decisions? Are their actions worsening their military or political decision more than helping it? (This is of course, rhetorical, but you're welcome to answer it.) That frame of analysis is where the argument is taking place. If you want to take it somewhere else, that is your prerogative, but don't accuse people of "missing the point" when you pull an argumentative bait-and-switch.
  4. How have I suggested that? Regardless, your amusement isn't a factor in political decision-making.
  5. I don't think kingzog is arguing about the relative morality of WTF's actions (accepting CT, etc) as compared to DBDC's (dual-membership nations). He's arguing that WTF is making a politically/diplomatically bad decision. By accepting CT, they've turned this into a deeply personal conflict while opening the doors for DBDC's allies to escalate things. And whatever side one holds in this conflict, I think they'd find this argument difficult to dispute.
  6. A toast to a treaty, and it's good to see bonds reforged. Stop being such a poopy-head.
  7. There's something pitiable about all of this... ...watching a "king" build his house of cards, only to realize that he is the jester.
  8. H2BKs, you were sanctioned for tech-deal scamming. https://www.cybernations.lyricalz.com/aid?nation1=545625&per_page= Transactions of note: 10/7/2014 11:59:26 AM (Accepted 9 million, no payment on 200 tech) 10/14/2014 2:23:13 PM (Accepted 9 million, no payment on 200 tech) 10/19/2014 2:11:37 PM (Accepted 9 million, no payment on 200 tech) 10/20/2014 11:54:53 AM (Accepted 9 million, no payment - amount owed is unclear) 12/18/2014 1:43:07 PM (Accepted 9 million, no payment on 100 tech) 12/18/2014 6:17:55 PM (Accepted 9 million, no payment - amount owed is unclear) 12/18/2014 7:02:04 PM (Accepted 9 million, no payment - amount owed is unclear) So basically, you owe upwards of 1000 tech to pink team alliances. This is not limited towards pink team - you also owe tech to Nordreich, Gramlins, and GLoF nations. This is also just counting deals that were labeled as such on the aid-screen. Who knows how many "Financial Assistance" aid offers were actually tech deals that you chose not to pay. If you are interested in paying back what you owe, send me a PM on forum or in-game. Until then, you will remain sanctioned on Pink.
  9. When you rogue a pink team senator in a politically-connected alliance, you should expect them to use the powers that they have. This has nothing to do with fairness. It has to do with the insane expectation that someone will not use the powers at their disposal to defend themselves. It's as if I were to wield a butter knife, and run up to an armed soldier. When I get shot in the face, I do not get to scream "that's not fair!"
  10. To: customerservice@ebay.com From: Hapapants@gmail.com Subject: Auction #5423456 - Complaint To whom it may concern, I recently placed a bid of 9 million dollars on Item #5423456 (Authentic DBDC Government Skype Logs) on Ebay.com. It appears my bid has not been registered, and I'm here to inquire as to why. There were no previous bids on this item and my bid was well above the minimum price. I have contacted the owner of the auction (User: H2BK), but have not received a response as of yet, which is why I have sent you this e-mail. It would be greatly appreciated if you could reply as soon as possible. This one-of-a-kind item is of great importance to me. Warmest Regards, Hapapants
×
×
  • Create New...