Jump to content

jalap

Members
  • Posts

    190
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jalap

  1. I'm not involved in your planning, so I can only guess what your role exactly is. I see the facts: you joined a war on an alliance that already was massively overpowered in a coalition that already is massively winning. I think that stretches the term 'support'. Technically, indeed you came in support. Perhaps I'm a bit paranoid, but as an observer, I would think the planners did not request your 'support' just to finish off aftermath.
  2. Perhaps nations should head over to a neutral to recover ;)
  3. I'm sure there's a fair bit of irony in that statement :) Doomsquad I'm sure everybody agrees deserves to take extra heat. For the way they decalred without CB on an alliance that did nothing to deserve it. They dragged in a whole bunch of allies, it is fair towards those allies that the instigators take more than their share of the heat. NpO settled that for you guys. And NG, they knew very well they didn't come in just to fight an alliance that already was on the ground. They knew what their role is, and they now can play that role.
  4. So you decalred war because an ally that doesn't need help at all called in your help for a cause your ally and yourself don't even really support. And your ally in turn was called in by another ally that didn't need help. It all feels so pointless...
  5. MHA is a fairly small alliance nowadays, it's been a long time since we truely had a leading role in war planning. So your point isn't relevant. As for this one, call me stupid, I still don't see it. You say it's not NpO. Then perhaps it's support for the DBDC tech tax? After all it started with Doomsquad, a DBDC tax paradise.
  6. Then why do this decalration? Surely your allies didn't cry out for help dealing with SNX. And for the fun of war I think also can not be the reason. Can't imagine you have many slots available. I'm a rookie in politics, but I do believe there is a good reason for this.
  7. Could post this But get the impression the planning was done by "I have a cunning plan... let us hit somebody else to roll NpO."
  8. Perhaps AFM has such good relation with NpO that AFM don't ask NpO to run blindly into a clear and obvious trap?
  9. NG has always been banging on about how great their military was and how puny the others are. You would have been insulted if less than 6 had declared on NG. In this war Aftermath is being accused of seeming inactive, then I would guess the more military minded alliances could have a fun fight while not even matching their NS. They're blowing their own fun going in like this. I'll take it that the overpowered rolling of SNX and NADC is a sign of high respect for them, like we respected NG's power in last war.
  10. So you attack AFM for reason that they "seem inactive". Then they do seem to fight back, NADC's stats are pretty good. So they get rolled harder, I guess because an inactive shouldn't be fighting back? You want to lure out your real target, why not stick to the plan along the way?
  11. So I assume TLR also declaring on NADC was miscommunication in the coalition?
  12. Well I must admit I overestimated Ai's size. Based on pre-war numbers: NADC 4,8M vs Ai 3,3M Java 1,6M Kashmir 0,9M SUM 5,8M Which is not that excessive. I'll just read it as a sign of respect for NADC.
  13. NPO's allies honouring their treaties with NPO is perfectly fine. As Ai did. Joining Ai based on an oA on the other hand smells pretty opportunistic. I find it hard to imagine Ai couldn't handle this alone. Or perhaps Ai isn't the alliance it used to be.
  14. Lol, NADC already is fighting NPO and still Ai needs to call in friends to make it a fair and fun fight :D Okay, could be fair and fun doesn't matter... In an ideal world, it does matter
  15. Can't blame the opponent you chose yourself for avoiding fight where they are massively overpowered. You better blame your leaders for not picking the right opponent.
  16. Friends standing up for each other in dark times. That's honorable. Good luck, Aftermath!
  17. After this statement, I don't expect any more effort from NPO to claim the moral high ground here. You were wrong to declare this war, it is not your fight. Had you come in at a later point, where you could fight the battle you wanted to fight, then I would perfectly understand. But to declare on an alliance & bloc that's just unlucky... I don't get that. And I don't even believe you feel very good about it.
  18. In that scenario, the next war can only have 2 targets; - The cowardish choice to go after the neutrals - The fun choice to go after current DBDC allies One day there will be people forming a coalition against the doomsphere. And that coalition will be initialised by one or several of their current allies. Will the side currently under attack be willing to help? Perhaps they'll get the mesage they need to clean up their own mess.
  19. Any new beer on the market is good news, but this one is a particularly nice one! o/ Fark o/ NPO
  20. Perhaps this is little more than a rogue attack, that usually get little attention.
  21. Don't let looks decieve you. He's a mean $%^&@#! And he has a plan. The Bruce Springsteen situation offended GATO, diplomats now are doing all they can to avoid war. We may end up having to release Bruce from the Emperor's personality. What will the next move of our emperor be? And will us humble diplo's be able to avoid the next escalation? For my diplo team, It'll be work 24/7. Or just hand it all over to Scytale.
  22. Nice looking treaty, love both alliances! cheers!
×
×
  • Create New...