Proest

[quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1323934201' post='2878682'] At first I thought you were just ambivalent to most subjects and abstained from discussion, now I really do wonder if you are incapable of forming an affirmative or negative opinion of anything. [/quote] Lol Myth, I certainly do have affirmed viewpoints.

[quote name='Ayatollah Bromeini' timestamp='1323933806' post='2878669'] And the Fark pre-empt... that wasn't opportunism? [/quote] Poor/brilliant strategy, whichever way you view it.

[quote name='mrwuss' timestamp='1323932632' post='2878648'] Eh, to be honest Fark deserves it. [/quote] Whether it is believed by others that Fark deserves what they are getting is in its self not really relevant; it is more or less the notion that the community is soo lost in the execution of vengeance that the leaders of alliances (albeit the opposing side) see nothing terribly troubling in piling on NS against a singular alliance. With the only apparent aim of either entirely destroying it, or crippling it to beyond repair. It seems however that not a great many have a moral compass about themselves as of late. Entirely separate from the TOP/IRON v. NpO war, the initial responses to Fark's attack on NPO is entirely justified in that alliances with connections to NPO responded in defense. This however, is blatant opportunism guised as defense of micros. The actions and incomprehensible behavior of the large portion of this community is just an abhorrence. All I can truly say. Enjoy yourselves, it seems nobody cares.

[quote name='Jgoods45' timestamp='1323928100' post='2878505'] You're more then welcome to defend Fark. [/quote] You're welcome to become less of a weasel as well.

Because the current number of alliances attacking Fark isn't enough, right? Truly pathetic.

[quote name='IYIyTh' timestamp='1323688065' post='2875117'] I'd think you'd be more upset over some of your allies actions. Those actions certainly seemed planned. (You're very aware of whom I'm talking about, too.) [/quote] Yes, I am well aware of what you are referring to -- and if you'd like to talk, I'll get on IRC just for you.

Isolde for Kaiserin.

[quote]• ODN Applicant: 0.81 --> 0.81 (+0.00) • Legion Applicant: 0.76 --> 0.74 (-0.02) • NPO Applicant: 0.59 --> 0.64 (+0.05)[/quote] Not a bad idea.

[quote name='berbers' timestamp='1323645589' post='2874344'] The only thing bad about this is I don't get to fight alongside our blood brothers/sisters! o/ TFD go get em! [/quote] Says the guy with the MHA pip.

[quote name='Ayatollah Bromeini' timestamp='1323636850' post='2874206'] Being in CnG gov, I can honestly say that it wasn't. You can take my word for whatever you think it's worth, Cuba, but it really wasn't. There were a lot of blue balls within the bloc, yes, but to believe that CnG would just attack MHA just because they can is just a flat out lack of understanding of our modus operandi. [/quote] Well, we can argue that point relentlessly, but I'll accept your side of the story in that pretense.

Well, hello there.

[quote name='Vanilla Napalm' timestamp='1323589997' post='2873684'] Now that's out of the way, do you have any solutions for looking after newer alliances? Perhaps some sort of treaty in which a larger alliance would ensure the little one received guidance and defense? We probably need something like that as well. [/quote] lol, that's normally arranged through archaic protectorates and PIATs. Alternatives are welcomed. :v

[quote name='Vanilla Napalm' timestamp='1323589662' post='2873671'] Not a bad idea. Perhaps something to the wording of "In the event of a unjustified, coordinated military attack on the X for this 3 month period, the Y will provide assistance." You know, this may well be a precedent worth making. Kudos. [/quote] lol, you're welcome.

[quote name='Vanilla Napalm' timestamp='1323588648' post='2873645'] I find the whining over pre-empts etc here by XX and SF to be rather amusing, considering it was initiated in this war by FARK. [/quote] I'm more bothered by the fact that an alliance that was given peace (with a rather suspect lack of no-re-entry clause) has been attacked as a 'pre-empt' when it was given peace to begin with. In many ways, I truly cannot say I am *bothered* by CSN being attacked in the sense of the action its self. More so on the account of the aforementioned peace that was given; on a moral level it is a bit bothersome. As a previous poster said, this sets the idea of alliances wanting guaranteed protectorate status of those they peace with for the rest of a war.

Yes, MHA is soo dishonorable that we were going to do [i]nothing[/i] at all while our allies were being attacked. /end sarcasm I apologize if we upset the anti-NpO coalition by not immediately responding to the attacks on Fark for attacking NPO and for the connected attacks on SuperFriends -- like was planned by those who attacked the aforementioned alliances. Am I truly to believe that the GATO Declaration of War video was put together in ONE singular day because *gasp* the other side felt we were going to attack an ally of theirs?? lol, please. That video took at least 2-3 days to create. The attack on MHA was planned whether it's admitted or not. EDIT: Grammar.

Just get a temporary Zetaboards forum.

[quote name='Sardonic' timestamp='1323582967' post='2873385'] This shot at CSN was unnecessary. [/quote] In a way, I agree.

Is the graphic big enough? Also, hi KT.

FAIL failed.

[quote name='Laslo Kenez' timestamp='1323563382' post='2873002'] You've raised the stakes, we didn't anticipate you'd deploy something that awful! [/quote] [quote]Oh flundered gruntbuggly, Thy micturations are to me As plurdled gabbleblotchits On a lurgid bee That mordiously hath bitled out Its earted jurtles Into a rancid festering [drowned out by moaning and screaming] Now the jurpling slayjid agrocrustles Are slurping hagrilly up the axlegrurts And living glupules frart and slipulate Like jowling meated liverslime Groop, I implore thee, my foonting turlingdromes And hooptiously drangle me With crinkly bindlewurdles, Or else I shall rend thee in the gobberwarts with my blurglecruncheon See if I don't.[/quote]

[quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1323523530' post='2872497'] You mean we're not going to pay them money to surrender? You guys do still have cookies right? [/quote] You have to admit, her message to you was hilarious. Loop holes and all.

This thread is like being high and trying to assemble a puzzle.

[quote name='Rush Sykes' timestamp='1323430602' post='2870826'] You mean exactly what your allies in Fark did to NPO? THE HORROR! This though, this outrages you. Just stop. [/quote] That's right, bypass the assertions that we were planning to attack TLR, therefor giving a 'viable' reason to have MHA attacked. Totally ignore the substance, stay on that paranoia train there buddy.

Wow. What a load of crock the declarations against MHA are tonight. Absolutely stunning. So, without a proper and noted casus beli, the forces of Complaints and Grievances (apparently now led by GATO) + Hooligans and TPE attacked the MHA for supposedly planning to attack TLR (lol? paranoid?) whom has been trolling us in #MHA for days now because we *haven't* attacked them and they *want* us to attack them to defend Fark. Okay, first things on this: MHA is a sovereign alliance whom has allies, like most of everyone else. Now, when a war occurs, allies strategically plan their moves, yes? Apparently, MHA is not allowed time to discuss and design plans for execution of assistance in a proper format and when so requested by her allies. Apparently, MHA is supposed to move to the whims and desires of those attacking our allies -- all right, I guess that's a fair demand, in a way. Not at all mentally balanced, but maybe fair. I would like to point out that MHA has been attacked by four alliances for absolutely no reason whatsoever other than some paranoid delusion that we somehow find TLR soo magnetic that we were pulled in by their constant harassment and lost in their glory that we just *had* to attack them. lol, yeah, right. Okay, so, now that the obvious has been pointed out, what does Complaints and Grievances + crew say to this? I am sure the answer will be soo amazing it will change the planet forever. But, I highly doubt that. Dishonor is the way of the world now. EDIT: Grammatical error.

Emma, this is truly awkward. Say hi to Julia.