Affluenza

[quote name='Viking' timestamp='1295970039' post='2600179'] I'm pretty sure GOD's moral compass is squarely where it was when Karma was going on. It might be normal for your alliance to chase a PR victory or whatever by swapping the way you interact with the world, but some of us prefer a more consistent and honest path. [/quote] Indeed GOD is consistent... GOD = Piggyback masters. Your're just sore you can't piggyback MK into war like once possible.

[quote name='Viking' timestamp='1295967918' post='2600125'] They had the chance to finish this years ago and wanted to whiteknight for every moralist in the game. In doing so, they all had choice words for people like me who wanted to end it there, only to now take advantage of the situation and roll tanks after NPO did nothing wrong. It's the height of spineless and if you don't think it is I have a wonderful bridge you might be willing to purchase. Don't give me that tired explanation of "herp we're at war look at our backbone." I don't buy it, and most others don't as well.[/quote] Oh dear... I remember Xiphosis stopping a potential war because he thought GOD and SF would get their NS wiped...lucky for us all then that we only had to wait a few weeks for the real deal and as always no harm to GOD's ns...yes indeedy. [quote name='Viking' timestamp='1295967918' post='2600125']This would be accurate if I had a history of trying to give white peace to my enemies at the expense of my allies, and GOD has never done that. MK, though.....[/quote] Yes MK gives white peace...still butthurt MK and TOP are friends eh?

[quote name='Seipher Caim' timestamp='1295964841' post='2600060'] I'm disappointed in many ways but one of the sadest thing to see here si the amount of paradoxians hailing MK & Co. Very sad... Don't give yourself too much credit... Preempting a target is nothing new and you dont create anything... You just used a technic you criticized last war. [/quote] Who said preempting is new? Oh and yes TOP woke us up...

[quote name='greenacres' timestamp='1295963913' post='2600042'] On the one hand, I've been saying for years that, the best reason for war is simply something along the lines of "$%&@ you, I don't like you guys" so, I can't say anything bad about the reason for this war. I mean, that's basically what you guys are saying to the NPO. On the other hand, I can't see what your overall goal is, so it's a bit of a headscratcher. What's your end game for this? When does it stop? [/quote] There is no end game... Everyone has said things are stale...and that certain alliances were not using their positions to effect change for the greater benefit of bob... Post-conflict a precedent will have been set and nations and alliances will once again be able to act upon their feelings of dislike for one another rather then bottling it up or trying to fabricate cb's against one another to win PR. That was essentially the problem...every war needed to have a solid cb but would have to also pass the PR test...

MK would still win what ever option...

[quote name='HeroofTime55' timestamp='1293086521' post='2551309'] You guys are funny. You think that just because you're at the top of the world, and don't have to get a full arsenal of weapons as soon as it's in your grasp, that the rest of the world shares that luxury with you. The need to have a full arsenal is the price I pay for the course I have chosen. Sure, it's a slightly less efficient economy, I pay an extra $290k in bills (Oh, the horror!), but I'd rather enter a war with 20 nukes than 5. It never ceases to amaze me how ignorant some of you can be. [/quote] I see...so you want to be a 60 second lover...I believe a lady is entitled to atleast more then that though...

MK be quite awesome really!

[quote name='Scorponok' timestamp='1286314594' post='2476318'] Very kind of them, I wonder if any more alliances will follow? [/quote] One can only hope...old habits die hard though.

It has to be MK no?

I think the answer is pretty clear...

Ooo...now I can represent even more~!

[quote name='Choader' date='03 April 2010 - 02:12 AM' timestamp='1270257118' post='2245998'] Ask your government why it became permanent. [/quote] I don't need to...evidence is already in the FoB embassy. [quote name='Choader' date='03 April 2010 - 02:29 AM' timestamp='1270258130' post='2246033'] What's funny is all of you claiming FoB was wronged are from MK, that speaks volumes right there doesn't it. [/quote] MK has always looked after it's friends even those that have severe inactivity or who in FoB's case left abandoned somewhat prior to impending war.

[quote name='Choader' date='03 April 2010 - 01:32 AM' timestamp='1270254718' post='2245933'] What the $%&@, why do you find it necessary to slander your alliance's founders in a charter announcement? we left over a week before the war on what was to be a temporary excursion, supporting allies that your own previous alliance wouldn't hear of us defending. Calling the previous administration disloyal deserters in the midst of war is patently false and a little hilarious coming from a carpetbagger. Tell me, when did a sudden concern for FoB occur for you and Tamerlane? Did you join of your own volition or were you on a mission? [/quote] How is it false? Did you not desert?...your still flying under the PC banner...so I fail to see the temporary...seems more permanent.

Keep up the good work guys!

I thought it was an April fools?

[quote name='Bob Janova' date='01 April 2010 - 02:25 PM' timestamp='1270128317' post='2243629'] Heh, April Fool merges are getting a little old now. At least put some effort into it, we got something like 9 million NS into TOG last year. [/quote] You doubt that MK and Vanguard have merged?

[quote name='memoryproblems' date='01 April 2010 - 01:38 PM' timestamp='1270125503' post='2243604'] Its not as if its a disbandment, symbolic measures aside and isn't "leading the way" something a leader would do? [/quote] Nadal is leading as he is co-leader. One chaperone in the front and one in the back effectively...Archon called the back end.

[quote name='memoryproblems' date='01 April 2010 - 12:32 PM' timestamp='1270125153' post='2243599'] Well, Archon's nation has an alliance seniority over 1300 days, if you don't care about it, whats the big hold-up? You have enough time to do the change here in your forum profiles, whats holding up doing it in game? [/quote] The captain is always the last to go down with the ship...

[quote name='ChairmanHal' date='01 April 2010 - 10:58 AM' timestamp='1270119480' post='2243554'] Check again on April 2nd...or whenever their hangover wears off. I think you'll have your answer. [/quote] I'll expect you to check and see the surprise...

NUTS!

I swear nothing new has been said or done since this announcement was made...a month on and still the same faces keeping up the lousy arguing... [quote name='Chalaskan' date='01 March 2010 - 08:26 AM' timestamp='1267432188' post='2209752'] When Kharma started, those fighting for the truths said they would not want reps from a war again. Then you have Grem against the codex they started, and C&G stating they would never be like NPO/Heg saying they would never do that...yet they try to deal reps that would be similar to those they opposed at the beginning of this war. [/quote] Wait has any allianced been disbanded? Has anyone been P-ZI'd? Or E-ZI? C&G was aggressively attacked and it is well within our right to make sure people pay. Don't blame other alliances and blocs for something TOP and others probably should have engaged TOP Speed!

I don't know whether this is true or not but meh! Regardless of anything reperations are the aim and it wpould be a bad precedent to start white peacing alliances and blocs that start aggressive wars. NUTS!

[quote name='ChairmanHal' date='24 February 2010 - 04:31 PM' timestamp='1267029281' post='2201536'] Be careful what you wish for...you might just receive it. Actually, I hope you get exactly what you wish for...it will make the second attack wave's job easier in 6 months. Oh wait, you thought this is the war to end all wars. [/quote] Ofcourse there is no final victory or defeat in war/politics/life.

[quote name='Bob Janova' date='24 February 2010 - 03:56 PM' timestamp='1267027221' post='2201486'] Hey Krack, you should read the FOK thread, where C&G are claiming that TOP have the advantage in the upper tier, before talking about 'lower mid tier'. Also, while no-one forced TOP to do the stupid things which they have done, no-one is forcing C&G to prolong the war or refuse to discuss peace either. [/quote] Exactly we wanna keep those who attacked us locked in war...what's the issue here? You think we care about pixels or stats dropping? Some TOP members have said they would like an eternal war...well lets see if we can't make their Viet-TOP wishes come true...

[quote name='Methrage' date='24 February 2010 - 01:16 PM' timestamp='1267017577' post='2201335'] You could be having fun with that if you were to just white peace those you are fighting, instead MK has taken more total NS loss than NSO as well as a similar amount percentage wise. Now see where your pride gets you, maybe you should be trying to convince someone else to $%&@ pride if you feel that way? [/quote] IIRC internally we at MK have agreed to not peace out till the very last nuke that we still own has been launched...