Kaiser

I joined the game a couple of days before the war started and never even knew about the war until GWIII when I started reading more than just the spam areas of my alliance's forums. Kind of sad I didn't really pay attention during.

Now I'm not very good at math either, but something about this doesn't add up.

Cluster$%&@ war sounds very fitting.

I believe you mean "Wher da hood at"

Batman can be found here if anyone needs him.

I think it sounds better too, but I think Supercomplaints is more fitting. Plus Avernite of TOP came up with it, and you gotta have some alliance loyalty

Ok, I'll make this simple. Coincidence held back on the attack because they know that they'll be massively countered soon. Supercompliants has much more NS in reserve than Coincidence. NAAC made the mistake in GWII and over-deployed their forces, I don't think Coincidence will do that. They know they'll be fighting soon, they are holding as much in reserve as possible. Why over-extend yourself in a war where you are at a significant NS advantage? It doesn't make sense Honestly, sometimes I really think a lot of people are just being purposely obtuse to try to score PR points. I hope to God anyway.

EVERYONE should stop arguing. Everyone is in peace mode, it's stupid to claim the moral high ground over an issue where there is clearly none. It just makes everyone look stupid.

The Supercomplaints side is largely in peace mode too. People taunting each other about peace mode while both are in peace mode are silly to the highest degree. That goes for anyone on the Coincidence side that taunts Supercomplaints too, before anyone comments.

Why is someone using a strategy in a war so objectionable to some of you?

It's probably because they want to wait for the counter, combined with the fact that a lot of nations are in peace mode. Still it's pretty horrible.

Show me where in the rules of CN you have to have a ceasefire during negiotiations? You guys started the war, without trying diplomacy. There is a huge difference between attacking someone while talking to them about peace, and helping your ally at war while they try to get peace. If you can't see the difference your stupid or being willfully blind.

What's there to deny? If TOP declared war on Rok over the spy thing we would be hypocrites.

Awesome flag.

I think it's about the whole duel thing. I guess the random guy is supposed to be NSO, but I'm not sure why they used that picture. I guess the Cactuar is supposed to represent cowardice? I dunno, I get it, it just could have been much better done.

I honestly thought you would be the bloc that would last the longest, due to same history you shared. Also that is the coolest flag thing I've ever seen. Who made it?

Don't you already have one?

panfilo never spied on Athens.

It's quite pathetic when someone leaves an alliance to save his infra after releasing information from private doors twice. To nyone that takes in Steve, be well aware that he is a spying coward. Steve you were the worst member TOP ever had, you are nothing but a pathetic bitter old man. As to the Gramlins, this is their choice to make. I'm still a little confused about it, but they are indeed sovereign.

Very very interesting.

I like the bullet during wartime, but I'd rather a nation count durin peace, if it's not too much trouble. Whatever makes things easier for you should be done.

The No DoWar or the Peace mode war, depending on how things turn out.

Friends don't let friends fight alone, it's as simple as that. We don't give a !@#$ about TPF and their CB, but we let IRON burn months ago, that's not going to happen again. Saying we have nothing to do with it is like saying MK has nothing to do with it, it's simply not true. EDIT: And this is getting rather off-topic. Let's stop discussing it shall we?

The old guard members aren't actually a fan of NPO. Otherwise, spot on.

Well played NpO, well played.