Proof that I'm not an invisible unicorn typing with my horn. Don't use such a terrible argument. There is evidence to support that he was the same person, that of him being on the same IP address. If there is evidence to the contrary, please provide it. Crymson has already provided evidence regarding Dr. Dan and Darkblade.
Dr. Dan had a roommate that played from work. The roommate must have signed on from their apartment when Dan was deleted. Even if he did have a multi, said person/multi was in TOP.
EDIT: why did I put never in there? It just makes me look stupid
In what timeframe was Rish a Triumvir of RoK?
What access level does and Advisor in RoK have?
Please address these questions Rok
To anyone: what alliance was President Magee in when Rish was a Triumvir of RoK? You people should go through your records, I've went through ours.
So what alliance was President Magee in when Rish was in gov? Cause whatever alliance that was, they have a CB in 6 months time. I suggest you all look in your past to see if President Magee was ever a member of your alliance.
If ROK denies the legitimacy of this CB by whoever that alliance is, they are hypocrites.
Would ROK agree that whatever alliance President Magee was in while Rish was a triumvir has a acceptable CB on them?
You missed the part where you still have the advantage in the upper tier, though it's not as huge as your advantage would be if everyone stayed in war mode.
Oh and the part where Supercomplaints started the war.
I thought Supercomplaints wanted a fight? They would still have the advantage without putting their upper tier into peace mode. I bet Sparta is happy with this turn of events.
That was the options avaliable via the charter. They joined the alliance knowing full well what they were getting into. Not anyone else's fault but their own that they joined an alliance where King Death had full control. They had no right to coup, and Athens should not have supported suck underhanded tactics in anyway.
Ok I'm sorry.
If the government didn't like him, they could have just left. They had no right to coup him, by the charter. They should have left. If the membership supported them, they would have left to.
Just out of curiousity, hasn't it been pretty well accepted by...well everyone that if the membership doesn't like the leader they can just leave?
Isn't this the argument used to hold membership responsible for the leader's actions?
If UED didn't like King Death, they could have just left.
If the rumours are true, and TPF's coalition is dropping everyone below 85k to peace mode, and Supercomplaints is dropping everyone above 70k NS into peace mode, this should be called the Peace mode war.
That's kind of cool. I didn't know when you edited the img and someone quoted it the img you quoted changed. But yeah, in that picture, the person talking had a TOP flag.