Kaiser

My warchest was weak: only 150m at 4999.99 infra. I've been reduced to turtling That's what I get for being a young nation with a MP-SDI-full spies though. Oh well, I've been turtling and have only spend like 30m. Even a 1b warchest will allow someone to through out like 75-100 nukes at 1k infra. I've already personally launched 19. This game is really broke...any alliance that puts essentially any work in their nations can keep going for months nuking 15k nations with impunity. I really don't like the MP wonder anymore.

As per the update log And yet I've recieved three spy attacks against my nation since midnight. One at 12:04:48 AM One at 12:05:42 AM And one at 12:06:31 AM I can quote the messages if needed.

True, this is what will happen for the first little while. Eventually however you're going up against 20-40k NS nations, many of whom don't even have SDI's. You can nuke them 6 times, and there are a TON of stagger screwups at those levels, so it's not unlikely that a lot of people will go to peace mode, rebuy 25 nukes and come out again. Sure, it's impossible to nuke constantely at upper levels while staying in war mode, but it's not that hard to send a TON of nukes for a very long time. It's only 4m to buy up to 1000 infra from zero. You're assuming that everyone has a SDI, and that's simply not true. At the lower levels the majority of nations don't have one. MK did this very good during the WoTC.

Should be fun

How expensive do you think nukes are? At the lower levels it's usually pretty easy to slip into peace mode as those member don't tend to be inactive. You then buy up to 1000 infra, and buy 25 nukes, which works out to what, 40m? Sure those nukes will not be blowing up very expensive infra, but take it from a guy that's been nuked at 3000-4000 infra a couple times, it's annoying as hell when you're trying to get up to full spies/MP/SDI/infra and working on getting warchest compliant. You pretty much just answered your own question, a nation can only be nuked once per day. If someone is in 5 wars and getting a lot of nukes through, they are taking a lot more damage than the nation sending said nukes. The curbstomped alliance gets beat fast, but they send out a lot more nukes than they take. This is what MK did to NPO during the WoTC.

I don't know, in a nuclear curbstomp the the attacking side tends to take a lot more damage.

I'll admit it, I laughed.

Too be honest, that's been the opinion of the General Assembly for months. Who knows, it may change, but I'm doubting it.

Then it will be a draw, if that's your definition of a win.

Remember guys, this is an OOC forum, so the answer is without a doubt one. This is a game and a lot of you people would do well to remember that. No one wins every game, and sometimes you lose some. I'm honestly still confused about what happened, but I'm sure in couple of days it will all come. Some of you people take this game way too seriously, yelling about delicious tears in a OOC forum? lol Here's how I see it MK: $%&@ YEAH, WE WON, we're AWESOME, SUCK IT SUCK IT, YOU GUYS SUCK CRY CRY CRY! LOL PLAYED SUCKAS TOP: Yeah, it was a good move, you win some you lose some whatever, this will be fun (and isn't having fun the point of a game anyway?) MK: SUCK IT! SUCK IT! USA! USA! CRY MORE BABIES, CRY! *mimes frantic fornication TOP: Yeah...*slowly walks away*

It all depends. If CnG keeps in a bloc vs 2 fight it should be a great great fight, if SF jumps in then they'll probably have a nice pyrric victory.

Oh it was communicated. At the very least NpO and STA knew what we were planning and approved it. I'm leaning towards this being a trap, but if evidence comes forward suggesting otherwise I'll be willing to listen. And Sunstar, if this was the case you'd better inform your members This is from a topic in our ODN embassy called "hahahah"

Haven't you heard iamthey?, TOP's war is seperate because e-lawyers say we need a treaty in what has been called "a war of Coalitions"

Hey, Mpol, got any good tips for us? It's always smart to learn from people that have been there before

Best move in the history of CN, without a doubt.

But peace is no fun, but if that's your thing I guess. I know I'll be having fun.

Well to be fair, a large portion of the world had to unite to take us down.

And you talk about Honour? Whatever, you're all scum that will eat nuclear hellfire. Burn.

CnG, you would have declared on us anyway. Sorry we didn't walk into your trap as well. Why are you trying to e-lawyer your way out of it? You were set to declare war on us, why would we do it on your terms?

You've wanted us for a long time, this is your chance. Are you willing to fight a 6 month nuclear war? For your sake I hope so, we've been preparing for a doomsday since WoTC, I hope you have too.

We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. Johan Vult!

That's really well done, and the best piece in this thread by far. Good work.

I enjoyed the frankness. Anyway, it seems to be me that both sides are playing complicated e-lawering games to try to get the treaties to fall the way they want them. Can't both sides just agree to say "war of coalitions, we're hitting *blank, blank and blank*? Xiphosis had the right idea in GOD's DoW.

How are you in TOP? You're clearly not enough. Go get some more stats to be about

That was without our 100k NS applicant