CnG's harm or success was never a topic of discussion. Again, IRON did not declare war on any signatory of CnG and neither did any IRON ally iirc. Why are you trying so hard to vilify IRON?
Ah, I see. You equate hitting DH to hitting CnG somehow. Well allow me to clarify, hitting DH did not equate to hitting CnG. See how easy that was?
Guess this means we can't expect a v-day card from you either? Looks like we'll have more for Int then! And it's a shame that getting to know our ally's allies constitutes BS to you. Makes parties awkward, I imagine.
It happens to be one of my favorite holidays, and I'm sure a well written one would improve you all's mood. No, but I don't think further discussion will change your interpretation.
I doubt our buddies in Int agree with that, somehow.
Hmmm did we fight in IRON-LSF? If not, hello.
...it means you should seriously re-evaluate your opinion, to finish your first thought.
On your second thought, likewise. I'm not sure what your problem is with us, but it appears we won't be exchanging valentines any time soon. Oh well.
NPO didn't fight for us, we warred as a coalition; each AA had it's own reasons for taking part.
Ah, I see. You were told IRON did not fight well, and so you believe IRON is awful at war. Only one way to know for sure, though, right?
Interesting interpretation. Wrong, of course. This is simply the result of a divergence of interests, and our longtime friends in Pacifica know we bear them no ill. NPO is still (and will likely always be) many IRONers' favorite alliance.
The two bolded bits reveal how misinformed you are, compadre.
Lack of resolve is not a characteristic of Pacifica.