Jump to content

Charles Stuart

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,470

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Charles Stuart

  1. Charles Stuart
    [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=113304&st=100#entry3037170"]http://forums.cybern...00#entry3037170[/url] http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=113304&st=80#entry3036941 Famous last words right there.
  2. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='BloodFury' timestamp='1358558525' post='3079197'] Needs more of this from Umbrella. [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070507035608/cybernations/images/d/d4/Blackbunchies.jpg[/img] [/quote] History could repeat if you post it too much.
  3. Charles Stuart
    The fire rises o/
  4. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='wickedj' timestamp='1358499186' post='3078538'] When does the rolling of Dave and Skippy begin? I would like first dibs [/quote] We actually hire dave out for the creation of CBs. Due to his last success the going rate has increased dramatically
  5. Charles Stuart
    Send the tribute over in 4 large bags please. o/
  6. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1357957852' post='3075149'] It's not helping someone in their "time of need" when you get in the car that they are deliberately driving over the cliff. This is NEW deliberately putting itself in a position to get crushed. [/quote] This As for the rest of you, making me agree with a shroom? I hate you all.
  7. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='KenoCore' timestamp='1357955781' post='3075131'] if you are not an ally then you are an enemy or one in the making [/quote] come at me bro!
  8. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='goldielax25' timestamp='1357876618' post='3074476'] Honestly, BFF could have played that card and been done with this. I've seen alliances do stuff like that before. That BFF spent all day yesterday trying to figure out how to best handle their inevitable defense of NEW, even when NEW did not deserve even the consideration of defense, is a testament to BFF. [/quote] I'm not making any judgement about BFF's character at all. I personally would have seen them cancelling the treaty in the manner I described as perfectly reasonable however as we all know..other people would disagree
  9. Charles Stuart
    Far as I am concerned, NEW have acted in a manner contrary to the spirit of the[i] mutual [/i]treaty between them and BFF and therefore the treaty is void, cancellation clause and all. The treaty was made for the mutual benefit of both parties, not to enable NEW to have back up when they went full stupid.
  10. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='Oranges' timestamp='1357818621' post='3073800'] Shhhh, you're giving away all the secrets! [/quote] You didn't answer my question
  11. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='Oranges' timestamp='1357808012' post='3073761'] If that bond still exists, it should have been formalised in a treaty. If we allow all agreements now to exist without formal announcement to Planet Bob, then why bother having treaties at all? Anyone could do anything they want, without fear of repercussion. Or, any alliance would be able to jump into any conflict without a legitimate casus belli. Chaos would ensue, the very same chaos which NEW evidently wants to propagate. The New Pacific [b]Order[/b] will always stand against the reality or attempt of chaos. [/quote] What about secret treaties?
  12. Charles Stuart
    Inb4 RV gives us a rant in blue text on how evil NPO is.
  13. Charles Stuart
    This treaty took longer to announce than it does to get pandas to reproduce.
  14. Charles Stuart
    Grats old comrades.
  15. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='Hiro Nakara' timestamp='1357046489' post='3070118'] Tell me about it, my SDI blocks maybe 3 on a good day, one of my first targets blocked 12 of mine in a row. It's okay though, NSO can't stagger for !@#$, so I'll be out tomorrow picking a fresh bunch of targets with more nukes. [/quote] I would have stopped after the third one and hoped for better luck at the next update.
  16. Charles Stuart
    Once TPF's nations are nuked into the lower tiers, GOONs become useful. Nobody fights one on one so why bother with hypothetical situations?
  17. Charles Stuart
    Such a waste of nukes within the early stages of war...
  18. Charles Stuart
    Discipline appears to be sorely lacking.
  19. Charles Stuart
    Gloating comes after a victory.
  20. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='Systemfailure' timestamp='1356182446' post='3066960'] [img]http://jolamble.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/home-alone.jpg[/img] NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! What else will keep the masses entertained over the holidays? [/quote] Santa better deliver.
  21. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='Sir Humphrey' timestamp='1356162626' post='3066915'] Nukes will do that to you. And the faster the Kaskus nations fall, the quicker they get into the lower tier for future rounds, thus reducing NSO's mathematical advantage <3 NSO [/quote] Only issue is according to what I hear...kaskus warchests aren't that flash and they are intent on wasting all their nukes on nations with SDIs so they might have no nukes when they get to the lower tiers and no funds to keep rebuying them... Means this war could be over very soon
  22. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' timestamp='1356134229' post='3066745'] I took the message for you. Something about treaties, the past, !@#$posting, CnG, SF, NEW, Kaskus, blah blah, more moronic bickering, enough walls of text to hide an army behind, somebody brought of something Sardonic may or my not have done, NPO is still evil, INT, LSF, MK, NoR, defining treaties, etc. It's okay, go back to bed. Nothing out of the ordinary. [/quote] I really should hire you to take my calls. Such splendid summaries are deserving of payment
  23. Charles Stuart
    Congrats dajobo and hopefully the transition is a smooth one. o/
  24. Charles Stuart
    Somebody rang for TIO?
  25. Charles Stuart
    [quote name='Longshadow' timestamp='1356067776' post='3066531'] There is only one way to view an MDP. For example because Kaskus hit us (as in you are the aggressor we simply went after the one member) our allies who hold MDP's with us can come in on our side if we asked them. If we attacked Kaskus first they could not do that if there was not an aggression portion to the treaty that gave them that option or required them to. [/quote] Umm no. When NSO as an alliance attacked a kaskus gov member, you effectively declared war on kaskus. Sure, you gave them the option but the presence of an option does not preclude the fact that NSO in this instance is the aggressor. You have a justified CB however the only allies of NSO's that could attack kaskus at this moment in time would be ones possessing aggression clauses in the treaties signed between both parties. You lot have my support in this but setting precedents like "you harboured someone on our ZI list so that makes you the aggressor who declared war on me even though we attacked first" is a bad thing that can escalate rather quickly.
×
×
  • Create New...