Mayzie

[quote name='paul711' timestamp='1335931615' post='2962075'] It becomes my business because he is constantly throwing insults my way, even his war declaration was meant as an insult. I am also pointing it out because we don't like bullies. His insults towards OP members as well as his raids in the past show a behavioral pattern that is indicitive of bullying. Every action has a consequence, play how you want to be played. [/quote] Rubbish, YOU messaged him first in game after spying on him well before there were any insults, which only came after the declaration of war and after you dragged RD into your personal vendetta with WAPA so that the rest of TE didn't see it for what it is - your use of OP to police TE & your personal grudge against Landlord & in association WAPA. You really need to grow thicker skin if you think him saying your nation name is girly is insulting. Believe me, being a smaller AA, we've been raided plenty of times after wars have reduced our av NS enough to make us targets, it happens to everyone. I never saw you ride in on your white horse then.

When does a raid stop being a raid & become a war? When the person fights back with everything at their disposal. What should you do then? Fight with everything at your disposal. It had nothing to do with you before you started messaging our members about it & it still has nothing to do with you now you're bringing it up here.

People send recruitment messages to members of disbanded / merged alliances all the time, I don't see the issue with it.

[quote name='paul711' timestamp='1335650474' post='2960534'] Lol you still don't get it Landlord... You posting pms in an attempt to show everyone messages made most likely in the heat of the moment, can only be in an attempt to try and embarass matt or OP. Trust me when I say this, I don't need nor seek your approval but truth be known I don't like your play style personally. As for all of WAPA I have nothing but the upmost respect for them but as for you as a game player, not so much. Anyone that raids people the uses nukes to bully them into peaceing out is over the line. If WAPA gov accepts that playstyle whatever but let me assure you, we are the one AA that you do not want to make a fight personal with. Relax with your tough talk, launch as well as eat some nukes and have fun. [/quote] Get off your high horse ffs, OP aren't some sort of TE police. The only person picking a fight is you with your harrassing of our members about their wars and spying on us.

I thought the jump was at over 1000, not exactly on it & that being at 999.99 wasn't necessary anymore.

Why do I even bother reading !@#$ like this and why does there seem to be one a week at the minute?

Sorry, I've been busy so didn't have time to reply to any of this. [quote name='Chaos Reigns' timestamp='1332702551' post='2942985'] After harassing and trolling me, you expect me to not get angry at the immaturity level of you children? You are the one that needs to grow up. [/quote] I need to grow up? I've never even spoken to you, but from what I've seen, it's you who has been running around throwing toys out of his pram. As Auctor said, there was no harrassment. YOU hunted him down. [quote name='Auctor' timestamp='1332741715' post='2943233'] you stalked us down to our channel and began berating me and attempting to join all the channels I was in. No one made any attempt to "harass" you in such a way as to illicit OOC threats and frankly you seem pretty unhinged. :/ [/quote] [quote name='Isaac MatthewII' timestamp='1332780650' post='2943349'] Well generally when at war you try to communicate with the advisary. Also nobody joined all the channels you were in :/... [/quote] [01:38] <+Chaos> hey Auctor [01:39] <+Chaos> $%&@ you [01:39] <%TheSnowman> lol [01:39] <+Chaos> you said you don't want anything to do with APC [01:39] <+Chaos> then you hijacked our alliance [01:39] <+Chaos> then you attack me [01:39] <+Chaos> when the round started today [01:40] <+Chaos> so you're a !@#$@#$ hypocrite and a little !@#$ [01:40] <+Chaos> that's all kid [01:40] <+Chaos> stupid little 15 year old You guys should probably learn how to better initiate conversations with those you're at war with. Also, you're one hell of a troll, I can just tell how much you must have been laughing while typing that & the rest of what was said. [quote name='Isaac MatthewII' timestamp='1332989513' post='2944733'] Lol omg its in front of your face. <@Auctor> OOC threats now? <+Chaos> [size="3"][b]this is a threat[/b][/size]: you would be a dead kid if you pulled stupid !@#$ and I knew you IRL <+Chaos> call the cops !@#$%* Meaning...again...that that was not a threat but [b]"This is a threat"[/b] Increased the size so you could read it. Also in response to that other guy, you are not trolling. By definition trolling is you are not serious. Apparently you are. And as he said [22:58] <+Chaos> your mothers **** is wound tight [/quote] lol omg rofl lmao it's like you're purposefully ignoring the "it's a good job you're behind a computer" line as though it's not an OOC threat. [quote name='Chaos Reigns' timestamp='1332995600' post='2944786'] Hahaha. You took everything I said literally and out of context. I'm not gonna sit here and argue with you kids over trivial matters. For the record, I didn't threaten anyone just because you guys fail to read and fail to stay in context. Lol bunch of nerds. [/quote] Ok then, what context exactly did you mean this in? [22:57] <+Chaos> I'm so glad for your sake you're behind a computer screen [quote name='Chaos Reigns' timestamp='1332917761' post='2944196'] End result: APC and RD are great friends, GLOF/Squatters failed. Boohoo cry less. (new round btw) [/quote] No. End result: APC disbands.

[quote name='Isaac MatthewII' timestamp='1332386937' post='2941440'] For some reason people take things on Steve way to seriously nowadays[/quote] Tell me about it. [22:57] <+Chaos> I'm so glad for your sake you're behind a computer screen I wont even go into what was said after that but you guys have got a lot of growing up to do.

My personal drinking rules: 1. Drink lots and often.

About time. Congratulations to everyone but Petro.

[quote name='bunnet' timestamp='1330083422' post='2927443'] I think WAPA done alright there, I wonder what they will hit us back with.............. The question I need to ask is why was Australia not anarchied and allowed to run amok. Worry not YNTTW [/quote] Because I hit three people and he already had GC's in place iirc. Every other nuclear nation was anarchied, can't ask for much more than that.

on LoSS. Pre-war stats for those of you wondering. (Although WAPA's NS has since gone up due to preparing for war) LoSS 19 members, 138,392 NS, 7,284 Av & 99 nukes. WAPA 12 members, 97,624 NS, 8,135 Av & 73 nukes.

I like how you're declaring war on an alliance you've been at war with for most of the round. That's a fine drop in NS though, did you have some members leave?

I've had quite a few sets through the years & usually go for Wahl, Remington or Babyliss. Can't say I've noticed much difference in the quality & the most I've spent is £30-40. I shave my head once or twice a week & normally replace them every two or three years. I also prefer to go for ones with a ceramic blade so I don't have to $%&@ about oiling them.

[quote name='Xero555' timestamp='1326916874' post='2902275'] And boy oh boy do a plan on bumping this topic, if I have my way itll never leave the top of this forum. [/quote] I don't think that'll be a great idea unless you really want to show every alliance you're unwilling to fight with them when the need arises & that you go off on childish rants.

[quote name='lakerzz8' timestamp='1328052999' post='2911899'] 1 casualty for every round of war we were engaged in? [/quote] lol, it seems like it. Out of twenty-one offensive wars, six of them were against you.

That was fun at times & it feels good to break 7m casualties, although they don't go up very fast down here. All the best with the rebuilding everyone.

Bob stains.

[quote name='Seryxel' timestamp='1326307843' post='2897475'] Looking to be recruited! I've got rather annoying resources (wheat and spices) and don't really want to have to change from Purple team unless I have to to set up a good trade. [/quote] There's nothing wrong with wheat & spices and resources are changeable now, so pretty much anyone should be able to get you into a circle.

[quote name='omfghi2u2' timestamp='1326045071' post='2895770'] Oh man if I only saved at how many of these I had. I think at least 6 or 7 times. I think you AZTEC guys are kinda forgetting some basic points so let me list them out for you. 1) If you are at war, you are going to lose nation strength. Trying to make fun of a nation for losing strength during a war is like trying to make fun of a person who is falling off a building. "Oh man you fell and you couldn't even beat gravity? You are a noob." It is inevitable, so please shut up. 2) If you are less then 10k NS and you are complaining at how everyone you fight at your level sucks or is inactive, then you really do have your head up your rear end. Try actually building your nation a little first and try fighting some mid or upper tier nations. If you are fighting someone who is in the lower level, there is a good chance that they are just someone who either just started, or doesn't really care too much for the game. Yes yes we all know you are God of CN and war, but please shut up. 3) GLoF is very good at staggering. The caliber of their nations isn't too great, and they do like to just throw nations at us, but I will give them an A on staggering. 4) If you look at the wars STA is fighting, its AZTEC + IRON which is 85 (initially) vs 605. If you want to count Colossus + WAPA vs Polar, then its 90 soemthing vs 317. However, Polar vs everyone else is close to 317 vs 1000 plus nations. What does all this mean? We are outnumbered almost 5 to 1. There is no reason you guys should have a shortage of nations to keep us staggered since you guys can cycle nations in and out. For example, elgringo1994 declared war on me. After our wars peaced out, he regained some nukes, and went back to fighting me again (which was a fun war). 5) Stop complaining and have fun. This is the most fun I had in CN, fighting you AZTEC guys. So instead of waving your e-peens on the message boards, talking about how your 5k NS is the greatest nation on Bob, go fight. That is all, back to my bunker. o/ -omfg [/quote] I remember that. Had a good laugh about it on IRC afterwards, when I sent you that message telling you I wasn't going to attack with a hangover anymore. These x numbers vs y numbers arguments are stupid and a load of rubbish when you consider that your entire alliance is below 40k NS. In fact most of the crap you've written hasn't even happened in this thread, other than #5 and I agree, people should shut the $%&@ up & get on with it.

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1325863336' post='2894105'] Never. Get on my high horse? My dear, I never got off it; I even ride a high horse while I'm spying. That's an interesting link, wowwwwww, 2008. I remember 2008, it was the [i]Pax Pacifica[/i], Francoists had it good, secret PZI lists, Farung was insane, Soviet Sindorin was more insane, Bilrow was a mover-shaker, I was a member of GOONS. Good times. 2008 might as well be Mars, and Tyga's inability to open his mouth without being shouted down as a bleeding heart moralist scumbag is more relevant to this discussion than terms he imposed when he was King Big!@#$ on Mars. Not to mention that those were terms imposed in defense of a techraid victim. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=13584&view=findpost&p=368314 [/quote] That's a whole lot of words over nothing. My questioning whether Tyga would be perfectly fine with the terms so long as they weren't monetary & him explaining those terms wasn't and still isn't aimed at you. It was discussed several pages back way before you came in piping up in that arrogant way that only you can pull off with your 'hotshot' comment. Thanks for letting us know there's a time limit when terms imposed are long forgotten though. How long do we have to wait before we needn't worry about paying this 90m back?

[quote name='R3nowned' timestamp='1325857718' post='2894059'] The only thing I got out of this is that tLR and WAPA have a MDP (when the hell did that happen?) and I didn't any DoW from WAPA [/quote] Almost a year ago. I don't understand the second part of what you put.

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1325783971' post='2893381'] Think again, hotshot.[/quote] I love it when you get on your high horse without having the slightest clue who or what that comment in relation to. I'll give you a clue, [url=http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=13584]not you[/url].

[quote name='Muddog' timestamp='1325765557' post='2893284'] Having a difference of opinion on your forum is one thing, in public not so much. Doing it like this makes you look unstable and washy-washy. [/quote] Everyone has their opinion of why they consider the terms neccessary, if mine are different from others then so be it. I guess what I'm saying is the terms were agreeable amongst all our government due to multiple reasons, mine are those I've said here. E: I'll remove the unneccessary washy washy comment, I see Wishywashy is reading this thread.

[quote name='Tygaland' timestamp='1325764178' post='2893280'] I didn't consider Auctor's comment as cocky, he quite clearly said they payment was not reparations but purely a demand from you to pay back the rebuilding aid you sent them ages ago because they attacked a friend of yours in this war. The other posters weren't cocky either, they were just deluded to think their semi-coherent ramblings against me were equivalent to an argument against my opinion. However, asking they repay rebuilding aid from ages ago because their treaty commitments saw them attack a friend of yours is just petty as I said. [/quote] I guess some of us see it differently in our alliance, having a difference of opinion on why the terms were necessary isn't a crime. [quote name='Mayzie' timestamp='1325759630' post='2893259'] Who chose to get chained in on an oA to dogpile our allies [/quote] As I said before ^ Their treaty commitments did nothing of the sort. Their treaty commitments didn't require NpO to declare on WAPA to chain in KoH at all.