Jump to content

Badpoet

Members
  • Posts

    105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Badpoet

  1. It's not so much a secret, but more like none of their business.
  2. [quote name='+Zeke+' timestamp='1304291125' post='2703469'] There is no such thing as spying once battle is joined. It's called gathering intelligence on one's war adversary. Had CoJ been found to spy before the war then you might make a case for demanding specific terms of them to let them out of war, this war that is. Right now all they are doing by gathering intelligence is....waging war on you.[/quote] Debateable... One could argue that the "allowed spying" is limited to spy ops ingame - an act of war by itself, if you will. [quote name='+Zeke+' timestamp='1304291125' post='2703469'] Seriously, ODN, did you really think that Schattenmann was going to roll over and play weak defenseless micro-alliance when you declared on him? Did you really expect him to simply ignore his best skills and play by the rules you want him to? This is what Schattenmann does best and any alliance trying to roll him is going to get a full dose. That you seem outraged is either a bluff or an admission you didn't expect this. [/quote] It's neither, to be honest. What we seem to be is just your own perception.
  3. [quote name='Biff Webster' timestamp='1304289433' post='2703432'] I hear that's called escalation these days. [/quote] Indeed.
  4. What ODN government is trying to say is: "Come out of peace mode, CoJ."
  5. First TWiN was better. Nonetheless, good read.
  6. Best of luck to you all! [quote name='Timeline' timestamp='1303836416' post='2699805'] I will say I am sad to see SLAP fall apart, but joining TPF is a good fit for you guys, seem you are protected by ODN yet again [/quote] You got it wrong, ODN is protected by TPE.
  7. Terrible announcement. You got away too easy. Well, bye!
  8. [quote name='Dingo' timestamp='1294619485' post='2570416'] I agree with Optional Defence Network statement. [/quote] For the last time...we're the Optional Defen[b]s[/b]e Network! And good luck to both NEW and iFOK!
  9. [quote name='Branimir' timestamp='1293050642' post='2550305'] If the treaties were to have been fallowed through as they should, we would now ALL be in a mega war, of crazy proportions and one which wouldn't be a curbstomp. But, cold rational thought prevailed. It is less fun, but you can not blame participants for being like that. [/quote] Well said.
  10. [quote name='Vol Navy' timestamp='1292876186' post='2546917'] So Fark is attacking NEW just for the sake of friendship? Honorable....but still and aggressive attack. [/quote] No, they are defending former DF members. [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1292876266' post='2546919'] True, but this thread has FARK saying they dont need something on paper to get in on this war and PC saying they dont have anything specific on paper to get in on this. Its fairly comical. [/quote] It's a matter of character.
  11. [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1292875119' post='2546895'] When the alliance disbanded or officially ceased to exist so did their existing treaties thats why the quicky protectorate was announced. [/quote] [quote name='Vol Navy' timestamp='1292875424' post='2546904'] Regardless, DF no longer existed. Their treaties no longer existed and Fark made no statement of protection. That would make this purely an aggressive action on Fark's behalf. [/quote] Not everything needs to be on e-paper.
  12. [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1292873337' post='2546852'] I dont remember seeing FARK saying they were protecting them. Their war is an aggressive one, that should bring in PC and ifok. [/quote] Is there a better way of saying it then declaring war in their defense?
  13. [img]http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/7151/recruitingbannerlicktheenvelopedt3.gif[/img]
  14. [quote name='ChairmanHal' timestamp='1290619414' post='2522176'] Why are these people never in range? *sigh* Look, you're in an alliance that figured out at some point that if they wrote enough treaties with everyone, they'd all conflict and they wouldn't have to fire a shot again. Then they decided after NPO was dismissed into Repsland that they could hang with actual cool people and with the threat of major war/potential major loss gone, your alliance butched up their act a bit. Neither you, nor anyone at ODN should speak, save to announce some meaningless NS milestone having been reached or a PIAT with some fill-in-the-blank alliance. You should otherwise sit quietly and let the [b]warriors[/b] do the talking until they are ready to tell you where your place is on the battleline during the next curbstomp. That's what a good meatshield does. edit: clarity [/quote] Follow your own advice and shut up. Just once.
  15. [quote name='Grumpdogg' timestamp='1290569983' post='2521737'] Apart from pages of self-flagellation, their FA department's main pitch to Polar after the past war was "well we're on the same side of the web, so we should like totally treaty and stuff". [/quote] True. Blame Joracy.
  16. [quote name='Karolina' timestamp='1290271176' post='2518228'] Umbrella's number two. [/quote] Who's number 1, then?
  17. [quote name='Hyperion321' timestamp='1290238963' post='2518093'] Asgaard and Nordreich. Individually, they are powerful. Together, they're just !@#$@#$ scary. I expect one of them (or both) to be the third major power of black one day. [/quote] You mean second major power, right?
  18. [quote name='nutkase' timestamp='1286379684' post='2477196'] [quote name='Hyperion321' timestamp='1286379318' post='2477194'] CnG has survived some of the worse things a bloc could ever go through. This is no different. [/quote] Care to explain further? [/quote] ODN joining.
×
×
  • Create New...