Jump to content

astronaut jones

Banned
  • Posts

    2,135
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by astronaut jones

  1. Like I said, I am stupid. It happens, haven't been on the NPO forums in awhile.
  2. By the looks of the blocked out letters, that person's name is about 6-8 characters long, at the maximum. That should narrow down their scope. ehhh.. maybe 7-9 characters actually.
  3. go go go go, go shorty, you brought cake. we 'gon party cuz this a big day. we celebratin' cuz you passed 500k. And you know we don't give a $%&@ if that's not real cake!
  4. That's a nice looking treaty, ha. You got yourselves a fine protector there, ha. Gotta give props to PC and TFO, ha. This ain't just for show, ha. but you gotta know, ha. I been listening to too much juvie and weezy, ha.
  5. This calls for a celebration, I'd like to thank all the diplomats from both alliances that made this possible: Jim Jones, Freekey Zeekey, Killa Cam, Hell Rell, 40 cal, Juelz Santana, Jha Jha, S.A.S. let's go! ... those might be the wrong diplomats I'm thinking of, either way, this is awesome.
  6. I'll sign that. Astronaut Jones of the Will Smith Empire.
  7. VE's purpose was the announcing of 3 treaty cancellations, two of which were their own doing. They admitted as much, even. Where's the spin in that?
  8. And this is just a coincidence then. Everything on PB is a coincidence.
  9. Seriously, me too. If someone wants to push you around? Push em right back, and I think they just did that.
  10. thank you. There are so many alliances these days, it's hard (and often a waste of time) to try and keep track of every acronym and what it stands for. And I mean no disrespect to Ordo Verde with this remark, I really didn't know.
  11. As a player, Jonathan Brookbank is essentially dead, and he needs to consider starting from scratch. On the other hand, EZI/PZI is a joke, and is only used as a means to silence so called "undesirable people" from actually having a say and being relevant to the game. No longer is EZI/PZI used because someone actually did something to that alliance that warranted such an action, but rather it seems people are added as a means to keep them down for no reason at all, other than to keep them quiet. What did Jonathan Brookbank ever do to these alliances that still have him on PZI/EZI? I'm guessing he never did a damn thing. It's a joke, a complete joke.
  12. I believe there was once a time when getting on an alliance's ZI list meant you had to do something to that alliance. Now, people are put on for what amounts to hanging around with the "wrong" people, or for mere disagreements. PZI is a joke.
  13. so many of those alliances have been around forever.. damn.
  14. Most alliances are always plotting and scheming about how to isolate this or that alliance. Most alliances also, even after "working things out" still harbour ill-will towards those they just "worked things out" with. most alliances aren't trustworthy enough to enter into such discussions and ACTUALLY come out closer. I applaud the NSO and STA if they actually did become closer after this.
  15. man, I love the black panthers. Fight the power!
  16. The treaty was signed because valhalla talked to them and then talked to us and they were like "hey, you guys wanna sign with gga?" and I thought "Sure, why not" and the rest of government was all "yeah I guess, why not" and it went, in about a span of 2 days or so from a PIAT (which we both agreed was useless) to an MDP to an MDoAP.. something like that anyway. I mean, there were OTHER reasons why it was signed, but it's probably best that I don't mention them here. But I will say we knew what our position was, and we also knew we might aswell use that to our advantage.
  17. There are never good intentions in trying to silence another's opinion. Never. I'm ashamed that an alliance I once ran was at one point allied to them.
  18. But the GGA all but admitted to being a puppet alliance, and they all but admitted that in a war, they're essentially the LAST alliance you'd want to defend you because of how ill-equipped they are for any sort of conflict. Being partnered to an alliance that is ill-equipped is one thing, but admitting as much that your alliance isn't sovereign and will bow to the whims of another is down right treacherous. Why would any treaty partner, any honourable treaty partner, trust them knowing they're not in control of their own alliance?
  19. I'm surprised some of GGA's more honourable allies haven't given notice of treaty cancellations, in light of all that's been revealed here.
×
×
  • Create New...