Joey67500

[quote name='Carfre Inpor' timestamp='1306920636' post='2721933'] Why don't we just vote democracy out of the game? [/quote] Use democracy to get rid of democracy in a democratic democracy? Inception.

If only Peggy had read this, then she might have actually been able to successfully accomplish at least one thing.

Ding Dong the witch is dead, which old witch, the wicked witch.. Wait... She's still here? #@*&! All in all, more people need to hit Peggy.

[quote name='Jacapo Saladin' timestamp='1307169732' post='2723623'] Now we just need Peggy Sue to come back and take over UPN to guide this bloc to near infinite power. [/quote] I would say that plan is already in the works. But I won't even joke about that... thing.

USN v. Maroon Peggy v. Everyone she met

[center][img]http://i301.photobucket.com/albums/nn61/joey67500/LBAMcopy.png[/img][/center] We at Menotah approve of this. o/ UPN o/ USN o/ GDA o7 Sentinel

Well, I imagine his entire nation would be demolished, not just his citizen count.

The peace is directly linked to factors involving our allies, I will not discuss it here in public. If you wish to ascertain the reasoning then speak with me.

It was very nice getting to know R&R and we hold them in high regard. o/ R&R o/ Menotah

[quote name='Locke' timestamp='1295675993' post='2591266'] Announcement needed more Joey. [/quote] I wrote it, but I'm like halfway into the old person home.

Here's to a civil wa... civilized war.

Sad to see you go. Have fun Jarkko.

Yup, we're still around, but I agree there are a lot of alliances I've never heard of.

[quote name='thaone' timestamp='1286621527' post='2479580'] Explain yourself on why you feel to good to make an announcement. [/quote] I've never thought myself too good to announce something. But I do believe that if things are not finalized than I shouldn't be announcing them. It is true that UPN withdrew from CDT. And while I cannot speak for the remaining members, but Menotah intends to maintain CDT, even if we're the only member.

[quote name='Guy NotRealName' timestamp='1284574437' post='2454869'] Legendary pokemon birds [/quote] No, just no.

[quote name='Allan a Dale' timestamp='1284177384' post='2449482'] This isn't an Alliance Announcement. Moved to the Open World RP. [/quote] Ok sorry about that, wasn't quite sure since the Alliance IRC list is in OWF, wasn't sure where'd this would go.

[quote name='LordJohnson' timestamp='1284175966' post='2449449'] Stuff [/quote] Can you specify if chaining or not.

Post Reserved for OP (If Necessary)

So I'm going to attempt to create and maintain a treaty web (WWW [World Wide Web]) for all of the alliances within the game. Please include your flag link, I'll be adding those who do so, first. Format: [quote]Alliance Name: Alliance Abbreviation: Flag Link: Blocs: Treaties (In order from MADP to NAP [Including whether chaining or not]):[/quote] [b][u] Notes (Please Read):[/u][/b] [list] [*]If you want to be added fill out the above. or you want it edited just post the alliance name and any changes. [*]If you can include the flags of your allies, I'd appreciate it, but if not, I'll look them up. [*]I will do my best to keep this up to date, but with the mere size of the task, it will be difficult, if yours isn't added in a while, PM/query/message me. [*] This web will only show treaties posted here, so for the time being, if you post and your ally doesn't. Only the treaty between you will be shown. [*]Any suggestions for improvement will be considered, and if any mistakes are made, please inform me, I'm only human. [*]I am aware that there may be other webs out there, but I'm interested in creating an all level treaty web with everyone on it and to be updated regularly. [*]The treaty web will be both posted here, and linked. [*] Key to the Treaty Web [Included on Web] [list] [*]MDAP - Purple [*]MDoAP - Blue [*]MDP - Red [*]ODP - Orange [*]PIAT - Green [*]NAP & Other - Cyan [*]Chaining - Dotted Line (Color based on treaty) [*]Blocs - Will be listed with the respective color and a thicker line. [/list] [/list] Web So Far (Note The Names are Not Visable to You Guys, that's on the layer names, I'll add them later. Just figured I'd get the basic web out. Only the first few posts. Rest are being added as we speak.) [img]https://dl-web.dropbox.com/get/Photos/MTW%20Small.png?w=b78faf35[/img]

If you want to cut down on your having to wait for people because of real life reasons. Talk with them beforehand, ask them if they have any things that would cause a lack of activity, given that there may be emergency circumstances, but I'm sure this would cut down on it a bit. And if you're so irritated by the fact that your conquest is being held up by someone's life, then go to war with someone else. The fairness to the attacker is the fact that they initiated the conflict and they also have the option to initiate any other conflict. The defender can't change who is attacking them, but you have plenty of control over who you attack.

Currently, I only recognize planned wars, not because I hate war or anything, just I think that a discussion allows a clear path, for instance if I discuss a war and we agree no nukes, and then we fight and everything is fine, but if I don't discuss and someone just declares on me, there's a lot of undecided variables. I don't generally wish to plan out who wins, although it can be a factor, but I wish to plan out the guidelines and how the war goes, not just because I'm a new player but because this format of RP is very different from what I've done in the past and I'd like to be able to have a say when someone is trying to kill my fictitious country that I spend time working on. Now I understand "you can just respond do what they do." but that person has the benefit of planning out their war and being able to change whatever they want to satisfy their needs. I think that when it comes to our individual RP, if we have a realistic or reasonable explanation of why we don't recognize a war, then it should be abided by. But things like I don't like you, should not be. Lastly, when it comes to OOC matters and the rules, I think they should be generally abided by or at least only a few rules can be ignored. Like a tech modifier or etc, but I think that not recognizing the position of GM or some rule just to satisfy your own ambition in a RP of a game, shouldn't be accepted. And I saw that someone said "in real life and cybernations people don't get pre discussed wars and all." Well in CN wars are generally raids for tech which don't apply here, or an alliance war, there's no real nation on nation wars, except when people organize a 1v1 and discuss the guidelines beforehand. And as to real life, there is discussion before war, not always between you and your adversary but amongst your allies. Generally (that's a big word), nations know if they are going to be attacked. Time also differs in this game, when a country in real life attempts to raid invade a country, it takes quite some time to move the troops over and then plan and assign generals. Here's like "I'm at your border killing your men and I'm going to move 500 miles in a day btw."

While I agree just saying, hey I don't like you and won't RP with you is not productive. But I think if you declare war on them without planning and they requested such it should be abided by, or have it so if you do attack a nation then if they contact you via PM to discuss the war halts. Edit: spelling

In addition to their coast guard, give them a cruiser or such? Or bigger ships if they are less technologically advanced?

[quote name='Centurius' timestamp='1283977898' post='2446861'] No auto-advances unless there is solid evidence the victim of a war is stalling it on purpose or refuses to war at all. [/quote] I'd agree with this on the exception of: If the person refuses the war, they shouldn't be auto advanced. For instance, if I say I don't recognize wars that weren't discussed or planned with me beforehand, and then someone declares war on me, and I refuse to recognize it, I don't see a need to have them get an auto advance, unless by the at all, you mean they won't war even if preplanned, in which case I believe they should be given a little time, but auto advances could be used. (Wasn't sure if you meant at all in the sense no wars, or at all in the sense of refusing the whole war.)

Good luck to new and thank you to the old.