Instr Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 (edited) [b][Update]: All parties have agreed to peace on the 25-26th update; the 25th will be the last day attacks go out.[/b] Gay Rollers has been attempting to get a war going for the past week or so, but due to SE issues (somewhere around 60-70% of our alliance is tied up by the VE-Polar war) we are unable to get a proper blitz going. Since we've already spent much time on preparation, we're opting to attack Warriors and The Superfriends without a proper blitz. Provided this war goes well, we're offering to provide peace in 3 days from the update after the declaration. Edited January 24, 2011 by Instr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoADarthCyfe6 Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 o/ The Warriors o/ The SuperFriends Best of lucking rolling them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Instr Posted January 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 It's over. I can stare into the blue, now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 Lame, now I have to fight 2 wars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMuz Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 Heh, I'm waist deep in this VE-NpO war too. What else am I supposed to do with a HNMS and a top 3% nation if I don't ragequit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewie Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 [quote name='MrMuz' timestamp='1295778737' post='2593772'] Heh, I'm waist deep in this VE-NpO war too. What else am I supposed to do with a HNMS and a top 3% nation if I don't ragequit? [/quote] ^ This Would you rather some of us had just gone rogue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazaraus45 Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 by 3 days would that be peace on the 26th or the 27th? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BALAN Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 (edited) Being that we are seriously out numbered in the nuke department, I ran out to the nearest store and grabbed the first thing I could find even close to a nuke, heres what I ended up with . GAY ROLLERS you better take cover as soon as I figure out how to get this damn thing together ! [img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_9s8iqcCd0DY/R7GYRJSr3SI/AAAAAAAABrY/TUTaJxQMg9I/s400/atomic-400.jpg[/img] Edited January 23, 2011 by BALAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewie Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 (edited) Don't worry, this is mostly a non-nuclear escapade. Edited January 23, 2011 by Stewie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 (edited) To the scoreboard. Time Last Updated: 1/23/2011 10:48:15 AM [url="http://tournament.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Warriors"]tW[/url] - Nations: 96, Tot NS: 176,000, Avg NS: 1833, nations over 4000ns: 2, Nukes: 0, Nuke capable nations: 0, anarchied: 34 SF - Nations: 10, Tot NS: 31,000, Avg NS: 3200, nations over 4000ns: 3, Nukes: 13, Nuke capable nations: 2, anarchied: 8 Tot - Nations: 106, Tot NS: 207,000, Avg NS: I ain't doing the math, [b]nations over 4000ns: 5[/b], Nukes: 13, Nuke capable nations: 2, anarchies: 42 [url="http://tournament.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Gay%20Rollers"]GR[/url] - Nations: 58, Tot NS: 232,000, Avg NS: 4,000, [b]nations over 4000ns: 30[/b], Nukes: 39, Nuke capable nations: 15ish, anarchies: 6 I'm hopeful I can add at least one anarchy in. There's your scoreboard. Congrats on a great war, Gay Rollers. [quote name='lazaraus45' timestamp='1295796118' post='2593909']by 3 days would that be peace on the 26th or the 27th?[/quote] Yes, please. Edited January 23, 2011 by Clash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therm Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 can we have peace quicker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guppy Fish Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1295803230' post='2593997'] To the scoreboard. Time Last Updated: 1/23/2011 10:48:15 AM [url="http://tournament.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Warriors"]tW[/url] - Nations: 96, Tot NS: 176,000, Avg NS: 1833, nations over 4000ns: 2, Nukes: 0, Nuke capable nations: 0, anarchied: 34 SF - Nations: 10, Tot NS: 31,000, Avg NS: 3200, nations over 4000ns: 3, Nukes: 13, Nuke capable nations: 2, anarchied: 8 Tot - Nations: 106, Tot NS: 207,000, Avg NS: I ain't doing the math, [b]nations over 4000ns: 5[/b], Nukes: 13, Nuke capable nations: 2, anarchies: 42 [url="http://tournament.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Gay%20Rollers"]GR[/url] - Nations: 58, Tot NS: 232,000, Avg NS: 4,000, [b]nations over 4000ns: 30[/b], Nukes: 39, Nuke capable nations: 15ish, anarchies: 6 I'm hopeful I can add at least one anarchy in. There's your scoreboard. Congrats on a great war, Gay Rollers. Yes, please. [/quote] That really looks familiar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 [quote name='Guppy Fish' timestamp='1295810139' post='2594188'] That really looks familiar.[/quote] Somehow, I knew you'd agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guppy Fish Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1295810292' post='2594192'] Somehow, I knew you'd agree. [/quote] How? How? :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMuz Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1295803230' post='2593997'] To the scoreboard. Time Last Updated: 1/23/2011 10:48:15 AM [url="http://tournament.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Warriors"]tW[/url] - Nations: 96, Tot NS: 176,000, Avg NS: 1833, nations over 4000ns: 2, Nukes: 0, Nuke capable nations: 0, anarchied: 34 SF - Nations: 10, Tot NS: 31,000, Avg NS: 3200, nations over 4000ns: 3, Nukes: 13, Nuke capable nations: 2, anarchied: 8 Tot - Nations: 106, Tot NS: 207,000, Avg NS: I ain't doing the math, [b]nations over 4000ns: 5[/b], Nukes: 13, Nuke capable nations: 2, anarchies: 42 [url="http://tournament.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Gay%20Rollers"]GR[/url] - Nations: 58, Tot NS: 232,000, Avg NS: 4,000, [b]nations over 4000ns: 30[/b], Nukes: 39, Nuke capable nations: 15ish, anarchies: 6 I'm hopeful I can add at least one anarchy in. There's your scoreboard. Congrats on a great war, Gay Rollers. Yes, please. [/quote] Well, who else are we supposed to hit? OP? PS? LE? Just sit around on our hands until the end of round? You've got twice as many nations, gang up on GR Don't worry, nukes won't be used on non-nuclear capable nations, if everyone follows instructions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 [quote name='MrMuz' timestamp='1295820270' post='2594485'] Well, who else are we supposed to hit? OP? PS? LE? Just sit around on our hands until the end of round? You've got twice as many nations, gang up on GR Don't worry, nukes won't be used on non-nuclear capable nations, if everyone follows instructions.[/quote] Many of your nations are out of range for most of our nations, statistically. Our 3rd biggest nation is about 3400ns. Your 37th nation is that size. We have no nuclear nations, just sort of underlines what a down-declare this is. You have TWICE our average NS, yeah this was SURELY the best fight you could find. Goodness forbid you should attack someone who might ably fight back, right? That whole "but you have more nations" crap, stuff that slantways. Please don't patronize. At least show us that much respect? You attacked just so you could say you were fighting, and to pick up some easy tech. None of your bigger nations were really going to be at risk - the scoreboard speaks for itself. The one who left to hide in TPC counts too (protip: That idiot should have changed AAs BEFORE he attacked us). At least grow enough balls to call this what it is. Use your nukes too. I wouldn't want you to be accused of war-slot filling. We'll fight back as well as we can. That's not an issue. I'm sure we'll kill the crap out of your 15 smallest nations. At least our "attack GR back" pm shook off five ghosts already lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOwens06 Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 The Gay Rollers are pounding me... Yes I meant to type it that way. All I was doing was trying to protect my AA and you send guys with double my infra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMuz Posted January 23, 2011 Report Share Posted January 23, 2011 I just wanted a chance to nuke SF. Laz's bio said he was protected by KOwens06. I assumed Warriors would be coming in to save them, so a preempt strike on Warriors looked like the best choice. Besides, you guys have so much score with those 96 nations, you'll still keep the top spot no matter how much damage GR inflicts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 This war is slow as, there should be so much poop flung in this topic already and it's still only page one. I vote we take the hint and just get on with fighting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Instr Posted January 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 (edited) The guy who moved off to TPC lost it and decided to rogue. I've talked to KingJames already, and he's being asked to peace out and come back. At the time of declaration King Hanzi had 3 nukes, and Lazaraus and The Penguin still have 13 nukes between them. The NS comparison was 240k (200 Warriors, 40 The Superfriends) ns vs 220k ns. As far as total ANS goes; the ratio is ~2:1, although pre-militarization our ANS was 3500. We've already discussed peace in IRC: you, I, and Lazaraus have agreed in IRC that it goes up on the 25th-26th update between Warriors, The Superfriends, and Gay Rollers. === I'm not happy with the way this war turned out either. I was basically expecting the update blitz to be some level of success, but afterwards I was expecting low activity from GR and a significant counter-blitz. When I went through war planning, the sheer number of nations without GCs and with low troop counts was daunting. It turned out that we had a decent turn-out despite the fact that no one was getting GCs as requested, and that we managed to get quite a few wars going. Edited January 24, 2011 by Instr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieG Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 [quote name='Clash' timestamp='1295803230' post='2593997'] To the scoreboard. Time Last Updated: 1/23/2011 10:48:15 AM [url="http://tournament.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Warriors"]tW[/url] - Nations: 96, Tot NS: 176,000, Avg NS: 1833, nations over 4000ns: 2, Nukes: 0, Nuke capable nations: 0, anarchied: 34 SF - Nations: 10, Tot NS: 31,000, Avg NS: 3200, nations over 4000ns: 3, Nukes: 13, Nuke capable nations: 2, anarchied: 8 Tot - Nations: 106, Tot NS: 207,000, Avg NS: I ain't doing the math, [b]nations over 4000ns: 5[/b], Nukes: 13, Nuke capable nations: 2, anarchies: 42 [url="http://tournament.cybernations.net/stats_alliance_stats_custom.asp?Alliance=Gay%20Rollers"]GR[/url] - Nations: 58, Tot NS: 232,000, Avg NS: 4,000, [b]nations over 4000ns: 30[/b], Nukes: 39, Nuke capable nations: 15ish, anarchies: 6 I'm hopeful I can add at least one anarchy in. There's your scoreboard. Congrats on a great war, Gay Rollers. [/quote] Now our war looks pretty good in comparison doesnt it Clash? Id go as far to say that LE, tW, DF, TFK, etc etc vs TPC G6 RE DR etc was the fairest war of the round so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BALAN Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 I was just wondering but are we at war with MCXA also ? Cause we are being attacked by them. I really dont think GR needs any help. I guess I will be the one to get things going. This war is really GAY ! Worst down declare I have seen so far. Warriors may have alot of members but that doesn't mean anything other than we have alot of members. Oh well whatever ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plutarch Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 [quote name='BALAN' timestamp='1295852566' post='2596152'] I was just wondering but are we at war with MCXA also ? Cause we are being attacked by them. I really dont think GR needs any help. I guess I will be the one to get things going. This war is really GAY ! Worst down declare I have seen so far. Warriors may have alot of members but that doesn't mean anything other than we have alot of members. Oh well whatever ! [/quote] Sorry, but CMEA takes the trophy for the worst down declare this round: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=97599 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 Welp, actually fighting the wars is never a problem. I love when people bring up that straw man. I did all my attacks and all things considered, did pretty well. I won against the two nations I had decent odds on, and I got underdogs in on the 3 nations bigger than mine. I don't think I missed out on any of those. Thank GOD for the underdog. I hate that thing when someone else is using it on me though lol. The current scoreboard: tW - Nations: 88 (bye bye ghosts/inactives), avg ns: 1750, nations over 3000ns: Two SF - Nations: 10, avg ns: 2317, nations over 3000ns: Three TOT - Nations: 98, avg ns: 1807, [b]nations over 3000ns: 5[/b] GR - Nations: 62, avg ns: 3818, [b]nations over 3000ns: 41[/b] Enjoying your curbstomp, GR? You bunch of !@#$@#$ cowards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted January 25, 2011 Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 [quote name='StevieG' timestamp='1295837165' post='2595214'] Now our war looks pretty good in comparison doesnt it Clash? Id go as far to say that LE, tW, DF, TFK, etc etc vs TPC G6 RE DR etc was the fairest war of the round so far.[/quote] They've all sucked this round, Stevie. Worst round in recent history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts