Jump to content

Announcement from the Socialist Workers Front


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, if Tiki and SirWilliam are gonna be free-lance protecting SWF's upper nations, I suppose I can donate my nation to the protection of their lower ranks. And of course, I suspect strongly that LSF will continue protecting members with the SWF AA as long as they wear it, being honorable and such.

I hope all you SWFers out there find a new home, one in which you can expect both stability and happiness. I do not doubt that whoever you choose will accept you with open arms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Fadeev' date='06 February 2010 - 01:02 AM' timestamp='1265443370' post='2163991']
Well, with this leadership this was just a matter of time. All what i said, fulfilled. Im just so saddened you destroyed my, milos and Defenders work.

Good night sweet prince.
[/quote]
This leadership? Still bitter that you weren't going to be govt after the last election Fad? Or is this you're 'I'm right, everyone else is wrong, $%&@ off I won't listen' complex you seem to have. Hopefully UCR is smart enough to keep you out of a govt position, if they don't I suspect they'll get to see your childish, 'I'm taking my ball and going home' attitude when people disagree with you.

So then it's your work that brought them to this, all those members and what 15 active at the most, look at us we're the largest leftist alliance, just don't tell anyone that 85% of our members couldn't find the forums. As for work, never saw you actually do anything, aside from whine when someone disagreed with you, then you threw a hissy fit and quit, so yeah, good show.

Edited by Che Lenin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SWF wouldn't exist if it wasn't for Fad, that's why he has a Medal of Service. But you know what, screw the work people like him and me did, I don't care. It's just a shame to see you guys piss all over milo's hard work. Perhaps his system was unsustainable, but we made it work before you guys came along with the wrong ideas about what SWF was about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, pass the buck, of course it's the new people, not the old, you guys obviously knew it all, what was it at the highest, 121 members yet you could only get 20 to vote on any given thing, yeah that has nothing to do with the way people were recruited, and the way inactives were used to pad your membership numbers.

I say it worked for you guys because no one cared about inactives, then suddenly people with half a brain showed up and got tired of being 'the biggest leftist alliance on CN' yet having zero activity. But please Defender keep telling us how you guys had all the right ideas and the ones who wanted changes were wrong.

Edited by Che Lenin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Banned' date='06 February 2010 - 12:44 PM' timestamp='1265485474' post='2164936']
I will say to some extent, that I'm sad to see Ray lose a home. Outside of him, the rest of that alliance was trash.
[/quote]
I guess if it's one thing Banned knows it's trash.

Edited by Che Lenin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Banned' date='06 February 2010 - 02:44 PM' timestamp='1265485474' post='2164936']
I will say to some extent, that I'm sad to see Ray lose a home. Outside of him, the rest of that alliance was trash.
[/quote]

I'd wager that you either didn't take the time to or simply didn't know much of their membership other than Ray, or that you're just that spiteful and bitter of a person. Either way, insulting an alliance in a disbandment notice lacks class and tact. Who am I to object though if you insist on looking like an $@!. <_<

edit: Added the quote so it's clear who I'm addressing. :P

Edited by SirWilliam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm rather disappointed SWF couldn't dissolve in peace, rather than have a three-act kabuki play demonstrating why it didn't work out.

Le sigh. Thanks for everyone who's been supportive, I'm sure our leftist friends will have a chance at our members and perhaps be able to mould them into something better than we could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One step back, but it is from failure that future success is created. If you guys give it another go later down the line you will at least have the experience to make it work.

Also I shall join my fellow Internationalists and give my nation to the cause of protecting anyone currently under the SWF AA from pouchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='zimmerwald1915' date='06 February 2010 - 02:01 PM' timestamp='1265490090' post='2165097']
This turned ugly quite quickly. Sad, really, SWF's former members didn't deserve this happening in their thread.
[/quote]
Yes they didn't deserve this, especially when former members Fad and Defender stated it off, quite pathetic really, one bitter because he was going to lose his govt job that only he could do in his eyes, and the other just whines about changes that should have taken place months ago and probably could have stopped the downward spiral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Che Lenin' date='07 February 2010 - 07:33 PM' timestamp='1265564002' post='2166977']
Yes they didn't deserve this, especially when former members Fad and Defender stated it off, quite pathetic really, one bitter because he was going to lose his govt job that only he could do in his eyes, and the other just whines about changes that should have taken place months ago and probably could have stopped the downward spiral.
[/quote]


By telling lies you really dont make this topic any brighter. I stated a long time ago, that i would not be participating in the next elections as a candidate. Also, before i left, i stated, that the changes in the connie would be the end for this alliance. As you can state now, i wasnt wrong. So - you fail once again.

But i think, this is too much to take for a i¤%&t like you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As in real life, things repeat in cyber life as well. ^_^
Anyway, don't want to flame in this - it's just too hot as it is.
By the way, there are a lot of "leftist" alliances who will be much too happy to welcome in their ranks the orphans of SWF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Fadeev' date='09 February 2010 - 03:24 AM' timestamp='1265711076' post='2170385']
By telling lies you really dont make this topic any brighter. I stated a long time ago, that i would not be participating in the next elections as a candidate. Also, before i left, i stated, that the changes in the connie would be the end for this alliance. As you can state now, i wasnt wrong. So - you fail once again.

But i think, this is too much to take for a i¤%&t like you.
[/quote]
Oh Fad, you and you're high and mighty always right attitude gets tiring rather quickly, the change in connie had nothing to with with the demise of SWF for the time being, the main problem was people such as yourself who wanted an inactive alliance so it could pad your little ego and give you a !@#$ hair of power. But please, keep BSing us all by making it seem like the changes we wanted to implement were what caused it, all the members know the truth, even if your ego won't let you admit it.

So are you always right, or just like half the time, because I mean when you were in SWF anytime anyone disagreed with you, you generally pissed and moaned that you and you alone were right, and you knew the 'right way to do things', must be tough being perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...