Balder Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Edit: If ADI chooses to have a couple "rogues" leave our AA and choose one of you guys to nuke, I assume that this is ok too, right? I don't think rogues from ADI would be able to do much. Still, I'd probably DoW on ADI so Corp can be world police when Polar's done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Warbuck Posted January 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 I don't think rogues from ADI would be able to do much. Still, I'd probably DoW on ADI so Corp can be world police when Polar's done. Ah, so there is indeed a double standard. Just needed to clarify this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balder Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Ah, so there is indeed a double standard. Just needed to clarify this. Indeed, there is also something known as sarcasm. Apparently you need that clarified for you as well. harsh or bitter derision or irony. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms. There you go buddy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Warbuck Posted January 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Indeed, there is also something known as sarcasm. Apparently you need that clarified for you as well. There you go buddy. I find it odd that you guys only pick up on sarcasm when it suits your purposes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x Tela x Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Hey, RoK. Why so much hate? You guys signed the treaty with the oA clause. If you don't want your allies to make their own decisions when you enter a war aggressively, then don't sign treaties with the oA clause. Quite simple, really. I now return you to your regularly scheduled ADI bashing. Enjoy! Also, hello Warbuck. o/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Hey, RoK. Why so much hate? You guys signed the treaty with the oA clause. If you don't want your allies to make their own decisions when you enter a war aggressively, then don't sign treaties with the oA clause. Quite simple, really. I now return you to your regularly scheduled ADI bashing. Enjoy! Also, hello Warbuck. o/ Oh, we don't care about that. We care about Warbuck lying, faking/photoshopping logs, passing them around in an attempt to deface myself and Ragnarok, and being an all around backstabber. It is unfortunate that the innocent nations of ADI will pay for the actions of one man, but that's the way it goes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Warbuck Posted January 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Oh, we don't care about that. We care about Warbuck lying, faking/photoshopping logs, passing them around in an attempt to deface myself and Ragnarok, and being an all around backstabber. It is unfortunate that the innocent nations of ADI will pay for the actions of one man, but that's the way it goes. Lol. That again? We all know what you said Hoo. I know the truth, and you know the truth. And the world has their own interpretation of it but will never truly know. Although your current actions are only proving that your character matches those logs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x Tela x Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Oh, we don't care about that. We care about Warbuck lying, faking/photoshopping logs, passing them around in an attempt to deface myself and Ragnarok, and being an all around backstabber. It is unfortunate that the innocent nations of ADI will pay for the actions of one man, but that's the way it goes. I've seen a lot of people bawling about the optional clause that RoK willingly signed. So for not caring about it, it sure gets a lot of airtime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Lol. That again? We all know what you said Hoo. I know the truth, and you know the truth. And the world has their own interpretation of it but will never truly know. Although your current actions are only proving that your character matches those logs. Yes, I know the truth and you know the truth. You, and by extension your alliance, will be a crater due to what you and I both know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 I've seen a lot of people bawling about the optional clause that RoK willingly signed. So for not caring about it, it sure gets a lot of airtime. A lot of people are angry that ADI pledged support and then backed out via OWF post, yes. But that is not what ADI is going to get rolled for. Sorry for the confusion, Tela. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balder Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 I find it odd that you guys only pick up on sarcasm when it suits your purposes I find it odd that you guys only pick up on sarcasm when it suits your purposes (I can do it too) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Warbuck Posted January 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 But that is not what ADI is going to get rolled for. Sorry for the confusion, Tela. Yeah, it's because ADI took a stand against the forcing of people out of the game. And everyone knows that. It's no new news, and thus we are your next target that you want out of the game. But there are some things that you cannot destroy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 (edited) Yeah, it's because ADI took a stand against the forcing of people out of the game. And everyone knows that. It's no new news, and thus we are your next target that you want out of the game. But there are some things that you cannot destroy. Warbuck, we're going to attack you for what you've done ... OK? Just shutup and get rolled when it happens. Also, I know that's the speech you feed your membership because they don't know better ... but it needs work. We have no interest in removing you from the game no matter how low you are. We will, however, wreck your nation repeatedly until you understand the consequences of what you have done. Go be a good leader and prep your alliance. Edited January 28, 2010 by Van Hoo III Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaitlinK Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Lol. That again? We all know what you said Hoo. I know the truth, and you know the truth. And the world has their own interpretation of it but will never truly know. Although your current actions are only proving that your character matches those logs. I suggest you dont play the character card, it will not end well for you. Personally, I like the logs where YOU are asking for forgiveness, acknowledging that they were fake, and telling Hoo you are going to post the truth, only to change your mind saying that your allies wont let you. Hoo graciously accepted your apology on the condition that you come clean AFTER you lied about him and backstabbed an alliance that looked after you from the begining. Well look at that you finally got one right... his character does match the logs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Hefe Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Yeah, it's because ADI took a stand against the forcing of people out of the game. And everyone knows that. It's no new news, and thus we are your next target that you want out of the game. But there are some things that you cannot destroy. But... if we run you out of the game, how can we blow you up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Warbuck Posted January 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Warbuck, we're going to attack you for what you've done ... OK? Just shutup and get rolled when it happens. Well so far I haven't needed to say much for you to show your true colors. I take it that you aren't going to take me up on any of the beer I offered in the OP then either, huh. More for me then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Hefe Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Well so far I haven't needed to say much for you to show your true colors. I take it that you aren't going to take me up on any of the beer I offered in the OP then either, huh. More for me then. Keep your crappy beer. I'll drink to the Kings with Captain Mo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Well so far I haven't needed to say much for you to show your true colors. I take it that you aren't going to take me up on any of the beer I offered in the OP then either, huh. More for me then. Yes, these are my true colors. I don't sit and let a shoddy leader pass around lies about us to further his own goals. Maybe Bob was right after all and you should have stayed out of the public eye until we came knocking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Sooo the tl;dr of this announcement is the former neutrals still havent learned to play in the big kids sandbox and want to stay neutral? Shocking! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Warbuck Posted January 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Sooo the tl;dr of this announcement is the former neutrals still havent learned to play in the big kids sandbox and want to stay neutral? Shocking! I think you need to read the OP again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Hefe Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 I think you need to read the OP again. I think it's a very accurate interpretation, given that this is a DoS and you are the author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Anglia Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 But... if we run you out of the game, how can we blow you up? Brave words coming from you Hef. You won't be able to jump back over the fence when things start looking scary in PM again, you know that, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valtamdraugr Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 I've always thought the DoS was a waste of time and a weak example of propaganda. I must re-evaluate that stance. This saved our propaganda corps some work. ADI.. I thank you. I am suitably roused in gleeful anticipation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Hefe Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Brave words coming from you Hef. You won't be able to jump back over the fence when things start looking scary in PM again, you know that, right? An argument for a different place Neo. I will say that my leaving Echelon had just about squat to do with things 'looking scary' and more to do with OOC reasons than than anything. I'd have left before losing all my infrastructure if that was the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Anglia Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Indeed, we will have that discussion at some point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.