Titus Pullo Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Henceforth, any nation which engages in hostile actions against any member of Ordo Paradoxia (Whether they be in the form of war declarations, espionage attempts, or otherwise.) will be subject to immediate retaliation by Ordo Paradoxian military forces. Diplomatic steps may be pursued at any time, but the Ordo will not delay retaliation to attacks on its members in trying to make diplomatic contact and nations that attack members of Ordo Paradoxia will be treated as rogues until seen otherwise. We also reserve the right to attack any nations who engage in hostile actions against our MDoAP partners, AZTEC, without notification or declaration. For the glory of Johan, Longbowe, Grand Master of Ordo Paradoxia, High Priest of the Temple of Johan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owned-You Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 This stance has my approval, do not piss in our snow and we will not piss in yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiro Nakara Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 o/ Ordo Paradoxia, doing the right thing since 2009. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Sounds like all is as it should be. Very diplomatic way of dispensing with all of that diplomatic stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dy Cazaril Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Huzzah! We'll kill them all! o/ OP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remaliat Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Works for me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayate Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Looks good, sounds good, feels good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penedono Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 Ever since finding out about our 6 day old treaty 5 miutes ago, I've been looking forward to reading up on this, too. Slowly catching up to things... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisK Owns You Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 (edited) Meh... Good luck... Edited January 2, 2010 by HisK Owns You Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shwypn Posted January 2, 2010 Report Share Posted January 2, 2010 hope this works out well for you o/ OP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 We do the same thing, gets us into trouble sometimes. Worth it though. War first, negotiate later. It's the TE way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wabooz Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 It should.. and could begin new diplomatic relationships as two AA's work the problem out.. or.. the worst thing that happens from a policy like this is war! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasj_tx Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 We do the same thing, gets us into trouble sometimes. Worth it though. War first, negotiate later. It's the TE way. I don't think that is exactly what the notification said. It says that in retaliation, will will defend and then work the backchannels. But I could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 This policy lacks boats. Get some. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasj_tx Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 This policy lacks boats. Get some. Done. But why is it that I am getting this feeling that your post is so very unoriginal? Let me see. I can't put my finger on where I saw that before. Hum. Pondering, Pondering, Pondering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 I don't think that is exactly what the notification said. It says that in retaliation, will will defend and then work the backchannels.But I could be wrong. Not sure what you thought I said? Someone attacks you, you hit them back. THEN negotiate. That's what I'm sayin'! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasj_tx Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 I guess it is my mistake..... War first, negotiate later. I read that as warring first and then negotiating. Not DEFENDING first and then negotiating. My bad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Henceforth, any nation which engages in hostile actions against any member of Ordo Paradoxia (Whether they be in the form of war declarations, espionage attempts, or otherwise.) will be subject to immediate retaliation by Ordo Paradoxian military forces. Diplomatic steps may be pursued at any time, but the Ordo will not delay retaliation to attacks on its members in trying to make diplomatic contact and nations that attack members of Ordo Paradoxia will be treated as rogues until seen otherwise. Warring = Defending = Retaliation by Ordo Paradoxian military forces. -then- Negotiating = Diplomacy Whatever the words used, meanings are meanings. Don't get all picky now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayate Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 I thought it was rather simple to understand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubaQuerida Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 Warring = Defending = Retaliation by Ordo Paradoxian military forces. -then- Negotiating = Diplomacy Whatever the words used, meanings are meanings. Don't get all picky now. There seems to be an extraordinarily high amount of alliance ghosting and subsequent attacking this round. I know OP and RD have both been subject to the brunt end of this. I'm all for immediate retaliation as long as it's limited to the just offending party. I hope sense can be made of this new annoyingly ineffective rogue trend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasj_tx Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 There seems to be an extraordinarily high amount of alliance ghosting and subsequent attacking this round. I know OP and RD have both been subject to the brunt end of this. I'm all for immediate retaliation as long as it's limited to the just offending party. I hope sense can be made of this new annoyingly ineffective rogue trend. We have a winner! Give this man a Kewpie Doll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clash Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 There seems to be an extraordinarily high amount of alliance ghosting and subsequent attacking this round. I know OP and RD have both been subject to the brunt end of this. I'm all for immediate retaliation as long as it's limited to the just offending party. I hope sense can be made of this new annoyingly ineffective rogue trend. Oh I agree, and we have too. If someone attacks one of our nations, our attacks back are on auto-pilot. Hit the nation back first, sort it out later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lysander Posted January 3, 2010 Report Share Posted January 3, 2010 *shoves mic in Longbowe's face* Mr. Longbowe, Mr.Longbowe, Is it true that Ordo Paradoxia ignores diplomatic negotiations in favor of a hostile, aggressive retaliatory strike against the offending nation, even if it results in snowballing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasj_tx Posted January 4, 2010 Report Share Posted January 4, 2010 *shoves mic in Longbowe's face* Mr. Longbowe, Mr.Longbowe, Is it true that Ordo Paradoxia ignores diplomatic negotiations in favor of a hostile, aggressive retaliatory strike against the offending nation, even if it results in snowballing? I think that you may just have the sequence our of order.... 1) get attacked 2) retaliate 3) get confirmation that the attacker was or was not a ghost. But I may be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kulomascovia Posted January 4, 2010 Report Share Posted January 4, 2010 Henceforth, any nation which engages in hostile actions against any member of Ordo Paradoxia (Whether they be in the form of war declarations, espionage attempts, or otherwise.) will be subject to immediate retaliation by Ordo Paradoxian military forces. Diplomatic steps may be pursued at any time, but the Ordo will not delay retaliation to attacks on its members in trying to make diplomatic contact and nations that attack members of Ordo Paradoxia will be treated as rogues until seen otherwise.We also reserve the right to attack any nations who engage in hostile actions against our MDoAP partners, AZTEC, without notification or declaration. For the glory of Johan, Longbowe, Grand Master of Ordo Paradoxia, High Priest of the Temple of Johan What if the attacker is responding to a raid by an OP nation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts